• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Microsoft / Activision Deal Approval Watch |OT| (MS/ABK close)

Do you believe the deal will be approved?


  • Total voters
    886
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Astray

Member
That guy's ego is incredible. I went to research a bit on him and for a guy that is nothing more than blogger I really don't get why some high profile companies like Oracle and Microsoft hire him?
Things like lobbying, astroturfing or expert court testimony etc.

He's a consultant.
 

FunkMiller

Gold Member
You mean Microsoft will have to create their own games now, instead of buying ip? Yeah, they're fucked. If there is one thing Microsoft have proven over the last 10 years, its the fact that they can't create for shit. Acquisitions was their only way of competing as nadella himself said.

Of course the main point of all of this is the only reason Microsoft entered into this idiotic deal in the first place was because it couldn't create games of its own. That's where the problem lies, not with a regulatory authority who doesn't think it's a good idea for one company to own so much of an industry.
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
Question for y'all.

There is a possibility now that one or both of Brad Smith and Phil Spencer may get fired. I personally think Phil Spencer is more likely to go than Brad because of how Xbox is performing overall, so it goes beyond ABK.

But ...

I don't think anybody has talked about the possibility of Satya Nadella being terminated over this? Is that a real possibility?

When Microsoft pays the $3 billion penalty, I reckon the board will have some questions. I think they will also ask what's next for Xbox, what's the plan, what's the current performance, and what's the ROI.

What is everyone's thoughts on that? And if it comes to Satya, can he make Phil the scapegoat at the point?
 

Topher

Gold Member
Question for y'all.

There is a possibility now that one or both of Brad Smith and Phil Spencer may get fired. I personally think Phil Spencer is more likely to go than Brad because of how Xbox is performing overall, so it goes beyond ABK.

But ...

I don't think anybody has talked about the possibility of Satya Nadella being terminated over this? Is that a real possibility?

When Microsoft pays the $3 billion penalty, I reckon the board will have some questions. I think they will also ask what's next for Xbox, what's the plan, what's the current performance, and what's the ROI.

What is everyone's thoughts on that? And if it comes to Satya, can he make Phil the scapegoat at the point?

I don't think anyone is getting fired over this.
 

X-Wing

Member
Question for y'all.

There is a possibility now that one or both of Brad Smith and Phil Spencer may get fired. I personally think Phil Spencer is more likely to go than Brad because of how Xbox is performing overall, so it goes beyond ABK.

But ...

I don't think anybody has talked about the possibility of Satya Nadella being terminated over this? Is that a real possibility?

When Microsoft pays the $3 billion penalty, I reckon the board will have some questions. I think they will also ask what's next for Xbox, what's the plan, what's the current performance, and what's the ROI.

What is everyone's thoughts on that? And if it comes to Satya, can he make Phil the scapegoat at the point?
I don't think anyone is getting fired. Aaron Greenberg is still there and Major Nelson is kept around although nobody really knows what he does... Microsoft is bad at management on a lot of levels, getting rid of useless/underperforming executives is just another one of them.
 

NickFire

Member
Question for y'all.

There is a possibility now that one or both of Brad Smith and Phil Spencer may get fired. I personally think Phil Spencer is more likely to go than Brad because of how Xbox is performing overall, so it goes beyond ABK.

But ...

I don't think anybody has talked about the possibility of Satya Nadella being terminated over this? Is that a real possibility?

When Microsoft pays the $3 billion penalty, I reckon the board will have some questions. I think they will also ask what's next for Xbox, what's the plan, what's the current performance, and what's the ROI.

What is everyone's thoughts on that? And if it comes to Satya, can he make Phil the scapegoat at the point?
Stock price went up on the news. :messenger_poop: will roll downhill not up on this I bet. They seemed happy enough with Phil beforehand based on the restructuring of gaming. He might be ok too. Unless they decide they need to do something for sake of it after trashing their own position trying to get it done. The PR and need to reset it might be his biggest issue.
 

feynoob

Gold Member
Question for y'all.

There is a possibility now that one or both of Brad Smith and Phil Spencer may get fired. I personally think Phil Spencer is more likely to go than Brad because of how Xbox is performing overall, so it goes beyond ABK.

But ...

I don't think anybody has talked about the possibility of Satya Nadella being terminated over this? Is that a real possibility?

When Microsoft pays the $3 billion penalty, I reckon the board will have some questions. I think they will also ask what's next for Xbox, what's the plan, what's the current performance, and what's the ROI.

What is everyone's thoughts on that? And if it comes to Satya, can he make Phil the scapegoat at the point?
Phil isn't getting fired anytime soon.
 

feynoob

Gold Member
Phil Spencer made their dream for cloud gaming and gamepass a reality and built a foundation which they can work on. That alone got him sometime in the office.

MS management fcuked up this deal, by making all these unnecessary moves and keeping the revenue to themselves.

Their greed was the downfall of this deal.
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
I don't think anyone is getting fired over this.
I don't think anyone is getting fired. Aaron Greenberg is still there and Major Nelson is kept around although nobody really knows what he does... Microsoft is bad at management on a lot of levels, getting rid of useless/underperforming executives is just another one of them.
You don't think this will be an issue with the BoDs when the time comes to pay the $3 billion penalty?

Also, seriously, what does Major Nelson do?!
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
Stock price went up on the news. :messenger_poop: will roll downhill not up on this I bet. They seemed happy enough with Phil beforehand based on the restructuring of gaming. He might be ok too. Unless they decide they need to do something for sake of it after trashing their own position trying to get it done. The PR and need to reset it might be his biggest issue.
Grubb said earlier that "I know for sure management is not happy with Xbox right now."

I think after consistently poor results, the failure of ABK, and the $3 billion penalty, there will at least be questions. Phil was okay because he sold a dream ~6-7 years ago. They may review his progress on how far they've been able to achieve his goal.
 

Astray

Member
Question for y'all.

There is a possibility now that one or both of Brad Smith and Phil Spencer may get fired. I personally think Phil Spencer is more likely to go than Brad because of how Xbox is performing overall, so it goes beyond ABK.

But ...

I don't think anybody has talked about the possibility of Satya Nadella being terminated over this? Is that a real possibility?

When Microsoft pays the $3 billion penalty, I reckon the board will have some questions. I think they will also ask what's next for Xbox, what's the plan, what's the current performance, and what's the ROI.

What is everyone's thoughts on that? And if it comes to Satya, can he make Phil the scapegoat at the point?
Brad Smith would never get fired, his current freakout aside, he's actually one of the key architects of their current overall strategy, which has yielded countless benefits.

Phil Spencer would probably be given some measure of time, but his days are numbered if Xbox doesn't make any headway.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Question for y'all.

There is a possibility now that one or both of Brad Smith and Phil Spencer may get fired. I personally think Phil Spencer is more likely to go than Brad because of how Xbox is performing overall, so it goes beyond ABK.

But ...

I don't think anybody has talked about the possibility of Satya Nadella being terminated over this? Is that a real possibility?

When Microsoft pays the $3 billion penalty, I reckon the board will have some questions. I think they will also ask what's next for Xbox, what's the plan, what's the current performance, and what's the ROI.

What is everyone's thoughts on that? And if it comes to Satya, can he make Phil the scapegoat at the point?

Make a new thread about it :messenger_grinning_sweat:
 

feynoob

Gold Member
You don't think this will be an issue with the BoDs when the time comes to pay the $3 billion penalty?q

Also, seriously, what does Major Nelson do?!
MS knew what they were getting in to.
Buying COD wasn't going to be an easy task. Especially with that price tag.


As for major nelson, he is director of Programming for Xbox Live.
 

Pelta88

Member
Question for y'all.

There is a possibility now that one or both of Brad Smith and Phil Spencer may get fired. I personally think Phil Spencer is more likely to go than Brad because of how Xbox is performing overall, so it goes beyond ABK.

But ...

I don't think anybody has talked about the possibility of Satya Nadella being terminated over this? Is that a real possibility?

When Microsoft pays the $3 billion penalty, I reckon the board will have some questions. I think they will also ask what's next for Xbox, what's the plan, what's the current performance, and what's the ROI.

What is everyone's thoughts on that? And if it comes to Satya, can he make Phil the scapegoat at the point?

Phil is already on his way out. It's not happening today or perhaps even this year but this is business. Forget the XBOX division and the litany of failures. The fact that most of the ammunition the CMA needed to block this acquisition came from his unfounded boasting and near endless string of PR statements aka Phil's own mouth... Couple that with the 2.5 Billion they now owe activision because of the failure.

You'd have to figure out the most complex mental gymnastics to create an argument where Phil Stays in place.

It's not an immediate departure. Think Halo Infinite. Cataclysmic failure followed by great PR... Then mass lay-offs when the timing is right.
 
Last edited:

Astray

Member
It's easy to say "yes they will kill the console division" or "no they will stay the course", but Xbox as a business seems to be operating on a logic that most competitors aren't able to operate under, so it's very hard to predict.

Microsoft seems to be in a general cost-cutting mode overall when it comes to its consumer products:

 

sinnergy

Member
Phil is already on his way out. It's not happening today or perhaps even this year but this is business. Forget the XBOX division and the litany of failures. The fact that most of the ammunition the CMA needed to block this acquisition came from his unfounded boasting and near endless string of PR statement aka Phil's own mouth... Couple that with the 2.5 Billion they now owe activision because of the failure.

You'd have figure out the most complex mental gymnastics to create an argument where Phil Stays in place.

It's not an immediate departure. Think Halo Infinite. Cataclysmic failure followed by great PR... Then mass lay-offs when the timing is right.
There are enough options left to make this work 🤣 don’t let all the emotion cloud your judgement . For example Activision can be split up into smaller companies before a sale happens, that’s how the world works . I bet MS had multiple plans, this one was the easiest , take the company as a whole . This story is not over yet.
 
Last edited:

feynoob

Gold Member
Phil is already on his way out. It's not happening today or perhaps even this year but this is business. Forget the XBOX division and the litany of failures. The fact that most of the ammunition the CMA needed to block this acquisition came from his unfounded boasting and near endless string of PR statement aka Phil's own mouth... Couple that with the 2.5 Billion they now owe activision because of the failure.

You'd have figure out the most complex mental gymnastics to create an argument where Phil Stays in place.

It's not an immediate departure. Think Halo Infinite. Cataclysmic failure followed by great PR... Then mass lay-offs when the timing is right.
If the man survived Xbox one entire gen, no way MS will lay him for these reasons.

I can see him continuing this entire gen spearheading Xbox.
 

feynoob

Gold Member
It's easy to say "yes they will kill the console division" or "no they will stay the course", but Xbox as a business seems to be operating on a logic that most competitors aren't able to operate under, so it's very hard to predict.

Microsoft seems to be in a general cost-cutting mode overall when it comes to its consumer products:

[/URL]
They are going to phase out Xbox consoles in 1-2 gen for xcloud.
The fact they have xcloud console in the production is indication of that.

Whether that works out for them is a mystery.
 

feynoob

Gold Member
How is he helping them though in this case?
Just like politicians, you don't need smart people for your cause.
You need someone who can attract normal people's attention. Florin guy is perfect for that role.

Look at Twitter. Most Media is believing his words.

Even patcher is stealing a living doing that.
 
Last edited:

Pelta88

Member
If the man survived Xbox one entire gen, no way MS will lay him for these reasons.

I can see him continuing this entire gen spearheading Xbox.

You're purposely misrepresenting Phil's tenure. It was this guy didn't survive the XB1 generation

233279-don-mattrick-deja-microsoft-zynga.jpg


Phil then got his job.

2.5 Billion payout is a catastrophe no matter which way you shake it. If you think the leadership team isn't aware of the true state of the XBOX division under Phil/s leadership, you're mistaken.
 

mrmustard

Banned
They are going to phase out Xbox consoles in 1-2 gen for xcloud.
The fact they have xcloud console in the production is indication of that.

Whether that works out for them is a mystery.
I think we will see one more console and that's it. Although the fanboys keep fighting over the deal and what it means for consoles and that MS should found new studios blablabla, in my opinion MS's goal and the reason to buy AB is xCloud/mobile gaming.

If Nintendo and Sony would allow Game Pass on their consoles, Ms would instantly allow it. You can tell that they are not very interested in selling consoles, because at first they took them from the market and used the XSX for their server farms and now unbundled Series X are hard to find. That's stupid, because people prefer consoles only.
 
Last edited:

Pelta88

Member
List of people who I will never listen to, period.

Idas
Hoe Law
Fosspatent
Jez
Colt
Rand al thor
Tim Dog

We have their receipts, right up until the night before the decision. Some of these clowns even scheduled CMA decision parties. If you're still listening to these frauds it's because you're on a mixed dosage of Hopeium and Copium and they're the ones supplying it to you.

giphy.gif
 
Last edited:

feynoob

Gold Member
You're purposely misrepresenting Phil's tenure. It was this guy didn't survive the XB1 generation

233279-don-mattrick-deja-microsoft-zynga.jpg


Phil then got his job.

2.5 Billion payout is a catastrophe no matter which way you shake it. If you think the leadership team isn't aware of the true state of the XBOX division under Phil/s leadership, you're mistaken.
Except Phil did his part and isn't responsible for that result.

MS played the 10 year plan, instead of examining the cloud part very well.

According to CMA, MS wanted 100% of cloud revenue. That is bad for cloud companies, as there no is revenue for them.

You also have to look at what Phil did for them. Not the content output, but the overall brand.

Gamepass and xcloud is MS point of view right now. It wouldn't have happened without him.

He might not be good for you, but he is good for MS cause.
 

Clear

CliffyB's Cock Holster
I think they pay him to do exactly what he is doing: advocate their cause on social media. I don't believe for a second he is consulting these companies on anything.

Mueller is a shill in the truest sense of the word.
He's a mercenary who will "advocate" for any cause if he's adequately compensated for it, whilst hiding behind his blog to create a veneer of independence and integrity. He's no different from someone like Brad Sams, who again presents as being an independent actor whilst being employed by MS via Blue Whale Web, a marketing consultancy he's been involved with for many years.

The crazy part is these "hidden" associations aren't actually hidden in any way, they just aren't publicized.
 

feynoob

Gold Member
I think we will see one more console and that's it. Although the fanboys keep fighting over the deal and what it means for consoles and that MS should found new studios blablabla, in my opinion MS's goal and the reason to buy AB is xCloud/mobile gaming.

If Nintendo and Sony would allow Game Pass on their consoles, Ms would instantly allow it. You can tell that they are not very interested in selling consoles, because at first they took them from the market and used the XSX for their server farms and now unbundled Series X are hard to find. That's stupid, because people prefer consoles only.
MS is software through and through. They dont rely on consoles, especially with Xbox consoles selling at a loss.

IF Xcloud were competent enough, MS would have released a mini console cloud only.
 

drganon

Member
List of people who I will never listen to, period.

Idas
Hoe Law
Fosspatent
Jez
Colt
Rand al thor
Tim Dog

We have their recipts, right up until the night before the decision. Some of these clowns even scheduled CMA decision parties. If you're still listening to these frauds it's because you're on a mixed dosage of Hopeium and Copium and they're the ones supplying it to you.
That Foss guy in particular is a nutcase. In comparison to him, the rest of those are sane. Well... maybe not colt.
 

Bernoulli

M2 slut
exposed

And when will the BBC finally realise that this is a paid shill that it habitually quotes? Where is the apology for bad reporting? Legal publications wrote about this seemingly unprecedented case and readers told us about it. As we demonstrated before, Florian got attention because he spammed journalists. It’s an ugly, unethical operation that this shill has been running with help from PR departments that utilise him as a mouthpiece.

“Oracle has admitted to the court that it retains the frequently-cited Florian Mueller of the popular blog FOSS Patents as a consultant. The official disclosure comes a week after the judge in Oracle’s lawsuit against Google took the extraordinary step of ordering both parties to reveal any paid journalists or bloggers on their payrolls. Both companies filed their responses today, and Mueller is the only person named in either filing.” Google paid nobody. Also, if you’re surprised by Mueller being paid by Oracle – I have a Paleis op de Dam to sell you.”



he is losing it
 

Pelta88

Member
Didn't Mattrick leave before the XB1 generation started?

Technically yes. I think he got fired before the XB1 officially went on sale. But he ushered in the generation

Except Phil did his part and isn't responsible for that result.

You're on one of your obfuscation tangents. Fortunately for me, I'm familiar with them so wont go down that rabbit hole with you. Phil Spencer was not in charge of XBOX during XB1 r&d or reveal. The head of the division is responsible for the division. Not his second in command or his secretary.
 

feynoob

Gold Member
exposed

And when will the BBC finally realise that this is a paid shill that it habitually quotes? Where is the apology for bad reporting? Legal publications wrote about this seemingly unprecedented case and readers told us about it. As we demonstrated before, Florian got attention because he spammed journalists. It’s an ugly, unethical operation that this shill has been running with help from PR departments that utilise him as a mouthpiece.

“Oracle has admitted to the court that it retains the frequently-cited Florian Mueller of the popular blog FOSS Patents as a consultant. The official disclosure comes a week after the judge in Oracle’s lawsuit against Google took the extraordinary step of ordering both parties to reveal any paid journalists or bloggers on their payrolls. Both companies filed their responses today, and Mueller is the only person named in either filing.” Google paid nobody. Also, if you’re surprised by Mueller being paid by Oracle – I have a Paleis op de Dam to sell you.”

[/URL]


he is losing it

He is crazy attention whore guy. He doesnt like people taking the limelight, and went to fight Idas for simply reporting this deal.

This guy is textbook of lunatic attention seeker.
 

quest

Not Banned from OT
Except Phil did his part and isn't responsible for that result.

MS played the 10 year plan, instead of examining the cloud part very well.

According to CMA, MS wanted 100% of cloud revenue. That is bad for cloud companies, as there no is revenue for them.

You also have to look at what Phil did for them. Not the content output, but the overall brand.

Gamepass and xcloud is MS point of view right now. It wouldn't have happened without him.

He might not be good for you, but he is good for MS cause.

What are you talking about they make money hosting gaming vms no different than aws hosting vms. You think Adobe give aws a cut of every adobe pro sold on a hosted vm? Nvidia doesn't want to pay for the rights to host each game. This deal is exactly what Nvidia wants. Add a bunch of games they can host with zero cost out of pocket. More games they host makes the service much more attractive to customers.
 
Last edited:

feynoob

Gold Member
You're on one of your obfuscation tangents. Fortunately for me, I'm familiar with them so wont go down that rabbit hole with you. Phil Spencer was not in charge of XBOX during XB1 r&d or reveal. The head of the division is responsible for the division. Not his second in command or his secretary.
Again, phil isnt the one that spearheading this deal. You dont leave a 67b deal to a lower worker division.
There are ways phil can get fired, but not due to this deal.

Its time you accept that.
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
MS knew what they were getting in to.
Buying COD wasn't going to be an easy task. Especially with that price tag.


As for major nelson, he is director of Programming for Xbox Live.
ABK, yes. I've said as much earlier in this thread that it would be unfair to Phil if they fire him just because of ABK.

However, it is possible that the ABK acquisition mishap serves as the straw that broke the camel's back. If management is indeed unhappy with Xbox's progress, the ABK debacle, the subsequent $3 billion penalty, and a performance review of XBS so far this generation, may frustrate the Board of Directors.

Mainly because the trend is downward. If the trend was improving, I'd think there is more time for Phil to steer the ship.
 

feynoob

Gold Member
What are you talking about they make money hosting gaming vms no different than aws hosting vms. You think Adobe give aws a cut of every adobe pro sold on a hosted vm? Nvidia doesn't want to pay for the rights to host each game. This deal is exactly what Nvidia wants. Add a bunch of games they can host with zero cost put of pocket. More games they host makes the service much more attractive to customers.
MS were keeping 100% of PS+now revenue.
 

dotnotbot

Member
It's easy to say "yes they will kill the console division" or "no they will stay the course", but Xbox as a business seems to be operating on a logic that most competitors aren't able to operate under, so it's very hard to predict.

Microsoft seems to be in a general cost-cutting mode overall when it comes to its consumer products:


"They don't need to worry about money", "Something something infinite warchest". Business is business, it has to bring growing significant profits or at least have a realistic perspective to do so in the end, otherwise it's getting canned.
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
exposed

And when will the BBC finally realise that this is a paid shill that it habitually quotes? Where is the apology for bad reporting? Legal publications wrote about this seemingly unprecedented case and readers told us about it. As we demonstrated before, Florian got attention because he spammed journalists. It’s an ugly, unethical operation that this shill has been running with help from PR departments that utilise him as a mouthpiece.

“Oracle has admitted to the court that it retains the frequently-cited Florian Mueller of the popular blog FOSS Patents as a consultant. The official disclosure comes a week after the judge in Oracle’s lawsuit against Google took the extraordinary step of ordering both parties to reveal any paid journalists or bloggers on their payrolls. Both companies filed their responses today, and Mueller is the only person named in either filing.” Google paid nobody. Also, if you’re surprised by Mueller being paid by Oracle – I have a Paleis op de Dam to sell you.”



he is losing it

5bkHBut.jpg


43.5% votes for Kim Kardashian. Says so much about him and the community of lunatics he has built on his Twitter profile.

P.S. Would be hilarious if Margrethe Vestager also blocks the acquisition, and then Florian and his minions start tweeting against her and how she knows nothing.😄
 
Last edited:

X-Wing

Member
5bkHBut.jpg


43.5% votes for Kim Kardashian. Says so much about him and the community of lunatics he has built on his Twitter profile.

P.S. Would be hilarious if Margrethe Vestager also blocks the acquisition, and then Florian and his minions start tweeting against her and how she knows nothing.😄
There is here a case to be made about sexism. But I’m sure the Era crowd that supports the deal will miss it.
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
"They don't need to worry about money", "Something something infinite warchest". Business is business, it has to bring growing significant profits or at least have a realistic perspective to do so in the end, otherwise it's getting canned.
Yup. While loss leader strategies are common and completely tolerable in favor of bigger future gains, there has to be a positive trend and meeting of KPIs on a regular basis.

Xbox may have gone under the radar a bit because of how insanely profitable Microsoft is and continues to be. However, I suspect that the ABK fallout may lead to closer scrutiny and review of the Xbox division -- and its leadership.
 

Pelta88

Member
Again, phil isnt the one that spearheading this deal. You dont leave a 67b deal to a lower worker division.
There are ways phil can get fired, but not due to this deal.

Its time you accept that.

You can't be serious?

“That's something well beyond anything I've ever done. I don't know that I'm equipped to do it, and the responsibility for that definitely hits home.”

You follow Hoe Law and Idas and regurgitate era posts. I know I'm not the only one who has called you out for that. But to be clear, Phil Spencer has been on every tv show that will have him, claiming he is responsible for the Activision acquisition. For you to turn around and claim that he didn't spearhead the deal when he himself claims ownership... Makes me think you're still studying those era hope posts for validity. It's been 18 month feynoob feynoob it's time you source your info elsewhere. Respectfully.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom