• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Starfield is No.1 in the UK boxed charts. Almost identical launch to Diablo 4

StereoVsn

Member
Starfield is No.1 in the UK boxed charts, which is impressive. It’s not the biggest physical launch of 2023 (it’s behind Hogwarts, Zelda, Star Wars, Resi 4, FF16 and Dead Island 2 on that list), but it’s almost identical to Diablo 4


since when gamepass counts in sales?
Maybe if it drives new subs I guess?
 

feynoob

Member
I don't think revenue is enough to make Starfield a success for Microsoft. You need to move the needle more than anything. You need to shift the narrative on mindshare.

You're also forgetting Valve's cut of the profit.

But that's why I said someone buying an Xbox for Starfield is the best case scenario. You have a shot at GamePass AND B2P, and B2P Royalties.
The revenue is the only thing we can measure with the limited data we have now.
Consoles are hard to predict because we dont have their data and MS doesnt share the numbers with us.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
I'm not talking about Dring's digital estimate. I'm using how Game Pass will likely hurt digital sales compared to Physical.

Sure, bigger digital share overall would naturally mean bigger impact on digital.

But the trailing posts I'm quoting to are saying things like

Dring thinks he is smart trying to use the 80% of Xbox sales are usually digital line.

Dring is correct about more sales being digital on Xbox, in the UK. We've seen that trend in pretty much all of these threads.


People buy physical regardless. There might be some loss in sales cause of Gamepass.

Digital is another matter. Who in their right mind would pay full price for a digital copy when it’s available on Gamepass for 15 dollars.

Digital sales are far more affected by Gamepass.

The game has been on top of the steam top seller charts for a couple of weeks now. It's also been swapping #1 and 2 with Madden on Xbox despite being on game pass.

but I guess if you say it enough, maybe it'll turn true. :messenger_grinning_sweat:

 
Last edited:
What Happened Reaction GIF by NCAA Championships
He's not saying gamepass uses should count as sales, just that each gamepass download is a user and thus adding to the total users of starfield.
Hope that makes sense, the edibles are taking effect now 😛
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
He's not saying gamepass uses should count as sales, just that each gamepass download is a user and thus adding to the total users of starfield.
Hope that makes sense, the edibles are taking effect now 😛

Page 1 of the topic is weirdly full of people who misread such a straightforward statement lol.

People who want to buy the game.

FYI, the game has been on top of the steam best sellers since August 20's~.
 

Alphagear

Member
Sure, bigger digital share overall would naturally mean bigger impact on digital.

But the trailing posts I'm quoting to are saying things like

Dring thinks he is smart trying to use the 80% of Xbox sales are usually digital line.

Dring is correct about more sales being digital on Xbox, in the UK. We've seen that trend in pretty much all of these threads.




The game has been on top of the steam top seller charts for a couple of weeks now. It's also been swapping #1 and 2 with Madden on Xbox despite being on game pass.

but I guess if you say it enough, maybe it'll turn true. :messenger_grinning_sweat:



Not the only one saying it. Read the entire thread.

If you think Starfield digital sales will be the same as Diablo 4 simply because Diablo 4 was 80% digital then get ready for more disappointment after the expectations and reviews this game had.

Diablo 4 wasn’t on Gamepass.
 

jm89

Member
He's not saying gamepass uses should count as sales, just that each gamepass download is a user and thus adding to the total users of starfield.
Hope that makes sense, the edibles are taking effect now 😛
But by saying it could be the biggest launch of 2023 by including gamepass he is comparing it to those other games.

Those other games have only sales going for them, while starfield has sales + gamepass user count. So he did include the user count for comparison with sales when determining it was the biggest launch of 2023.
 
Last edited:
But by saying it could be the biggest launch of 2023 by including gamepass he is comparing it to those other games.

Those other games have only sales going for them, while starfield has sales + gamepass user count. So he did include the user count for comparison with sales when determining it was the biggest launch of 2023.
Yea I see what you're saying. Seems misleading, that comparison.
 

jroc74

Phone reception is more important to me than human rights
He's not saying gamepass uses should count as sales, just that each gamepass download is a user and thus adding to the total users of starfield.
Hope that makes sense, the edibles are taking effect now 😛

Page 1 of the topic is weirdly full of people who misread such a straightforward statement lol.



FYI, the game has been on top of the steam best sellers since August 20's~.
You have to admit that a person who usually tweets about sales....adding Game Pass is a wee bit odd.

I cant even remember the last time he did that, if ever.
 
Last edited:
Phil and the Xbox team bet everything on this game.
As good as these numbers are, they're still not 'game of a generation/will turn things around' level.

I wonder how much of an impact it had on the hardware tho
Im so tired of this bs. Todd nor Phil ever said that it was going to be game of the generation. The problem with you lames is that you critique games based off your fanboy rhetoric.
 
he is using gamepass to say it's the biggest launch

it doesn't make sense at all unless now downloads and sales are equal :messenger_tears_of_joy:
It might not be equal in monetary gain, but both combined show a increased interest in playing the game. We can acknowledge that at least....
 

zedinen

Member
The Ministry of Truth has declared the official narrative. Your eyes can deceive you, don't trust them.


aPRDIVp.jpg


qAfDB9p.jpg



Amazon UK: Hardware
#12 PS5 Standard
#26 PS5 Digital
#69 Series S
#84 Series X

Amazon UK: Software
#7 FC 24 (PS5)
#9 Spider-Man 2 (PS5)
#23 FC 24 (Series X)
#24 Starfield (Series X)
 

DenchDeckard

Moderated wildly
Now Chris Dring is going to feel the Wrath!

Also, I've never seen division like this over a game. Guys are doing somersaults to downplay this.

Gonna be a lot of stupid looking people when the digital data releases.... :/
 
Last edited:
Plenty of topics have reached an abysmal level since the release of Starfield, that's incredible...

Between those who can't help finding the slightest excuse to spit on it (even if it means distorting words and information), those who need to defend it against each attack like bots.

Watching a video of animals eating their poop would currently be more interesting than reading some topics that mentions starfield.

idiot hitting GIF
 

Godot25

Banned
How are you determining that?
I mean. You can try to pretend that having 2+ million copies sold in Early Access (unofficially) and 6 million players in first official day of general release in unsuccessful for new IP. I'm not gonna try to convince you otherwise.

...all while Final Fantasy XVI was huge success by selling 3 million copies in one week :p

While one is a new IP and other is new mainline entry in decade old franchise.

General rule is that if you are bragging about players numbers/sales, then you consider your product a success. That's why we never heard how many players Redfall had.
 
Last edited:
I mean cmon we all knew it was bad when opening weekend they said “6 million players” and not X hundred million dollars generated or even X copies shipped/sold

Anecdotally none of my casual friends who certainly know skyrim by now knew what this was and if they did they had no plans to buy it
 

Chukhopops

Member
The Ministry of Truth has declared the official narrative. Your eyes can deceive you, don't trust them.


aPRDIVp.jpg


qAfDB9p.jpg



Amazon UK: Hardware
#12 PS5 Standard
#26 PS5 Digital
#69 Series S
#84 Series X

Amazon UK: Software
#7 FC 24 (PS5)
#9 Spider-Man 2 (PS5)
#23 FC 24 (Series X)
#24 Starfield (Series X)
Where did anyone say it was selling more than BG3? This is the mother of all strawman arguments.

I love how Dring was always considered a solid, unbiased source but now that he disagrees with the mob he’s somehow compromised. Imagine thinking you understand the market better than a professional running a industry analysis site?

How deep into your own ass you’d have to be.
 

DenchDeckard

Moderated wildly
It will be crazy if a new ip outsells long standing gaming franchises and with game pass. Wonder how that will be spun...tune in later in the week to find out, in another chilling episode of sales Gaf!
 
Last edited:

Dick Jones

Gold Member
It will be crazy if a new ip outsells long standing gaming franchises and with game pass. Wonder how that will be spun...tune in later in the week to find out, in another chilling episode of sales Gaf!
We will never know real numbers so we can't compare. 20m Halo players was touted as the game being a runaway success.


It was not


Until Microsoft restart giving real figures, good or bad, we are stuck in a endless cycle of sniping at either the package the info comes in or the lack of info.
 

Godot25

Banned
We will never know real numbers so we can't compare. 20m Halo players was touted as the game being a runaway success.


It was not


Until Microsoft restart giving real figures, good or bad, we are stuck in a endless cycle of sniping at either the package the info comes in or the lack of info.
Who touted Halo Infinite as a runaway success?
I mean. Game had great reviews, I will not deny that.

But I remember general sentiment around players numbers being "that's kinda low" because of Forza Horizon 5 which had 18 million players at the same time.
Which was true, because Halo Infinite MP was completely free-to-play, while Horizon 5 did not have F2P component.

So it was 20 million Halo Infinite players while half of game is F2P vs. 18 million of Forza Horizon 5 which is not F2P.
Nobody in their right mind labelled Halo Infinite "runaway success"
 
Last edited:

Ozzie666

Member
One flaw in any of these arguements is the casual player like myself. I renewed game pass for 1 month. I don't intend to renew game pass again until something major comes a long. Since I am not into Forza, thats probably 2024 for me. I'm sure I am not a lone in this regard. So they got $15 of my money, with whatevever % going towards Starfield. I'm not a long term subscriber or consistent subsriber. Then count the long term subscriptions that paid $1 a month. That certaintly won't go far. Gamepass as a metric is completely useless.

Secondly, as people keep pointing out Diablo was not on Gamepass, so it actually had to convince "work" for people to buy it, not just download and try it. The comment of the tweet is very misleading to include gamepass, or misunderstood.

Now if you want to talk about honest to goodness Steam purchases, that's another thing. I suspect the game did well there and the modding community will give it legs. But will it be enough to recoupe development costs? I don't honestly know.
 
He's not equating game pass to sales. That's something users here are doing.
Well, I' m not really sure of what he is doing, considering that the first game on his list , HL, had higher Steam sales and WAY higher physical sales. How can he expectingthat digital sale, for a game that is on GP, are high enough to make up for the difference ?
 
Last edited:
Now Chris Dring is going to feel the Wrath!

Also, I've never seen division like this over a game. Guys are doing somersaults to downplay this.

Gonna be a lot of stupid looking people when the digital data releases.... :/
It always happen with every first party games
Last year people were comparing horizon forbidden west sells to elden ring
And people were shit posting in every forbidden west thread
And the same thing is happening with starfield this year
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
300k concurrent users is pretty impressive for just steam. i mean it's no baldur's gate 3, but few games are.
For a big Bethesda game? It's not, really.

For context, this is how BGS games' peak counts on Steam usually look like:
  • Fallout 4 = 472,962 (8 years ago)
  • Starfield = 330,723 (2023)
Now, let's see the nuances -- especially in the context of how small Steam was back then.
  • In 2015, when Fallout 4 hit 473K, Steam had a CCU of 8.5 million.
  • In 2023, when Starfield hit 330K, Steam has a CCU of 33 million.
So, Steam's CCU has increased by 388%. Meanwhile, Starfield's CCU has gone down by 30%. Ideally, it should have increased by at least 388%.

Now, there is a valid argument that Steam's CCU is low because of PC Game Pass. Currently it is at #12 on the most played game on PC, behind Destiny 2!

XeWsx4f.jpg


Also, looking at this poll on the purple site, it is very evident that the game underperformed and below expectations.

RreOIKw.jpg


Overall, Starfield is at #27 on Steam's all-time peak list. A couple of games that had a higher CCU peak than Starfield: Hitman 2 and Life is Strange 2.

zb4MSlu.jpg
7MLFpGV.jpg


Before release, had anybody said that Starfield would have a smaller CCU than Hitman 2 and Life is Strange 2, they would got utterly mocked (and rightly so).
 
Last edited:

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
Who touted Halo Infinite as a runaway success?
I mean. Game had great reviews, I will not deny that.

But I remember general sentiment around players numbers being "that's kinda low" because of Forza Horizon 5 which had 18 million players at the same time.
Which was true, because Halo Infinite MP was completely free-to-play, while Horizon 5 did not have F2P component.

So it was 20 million Halo Infinite players while half of game is F2P vs. 18 million of Forza Horizon 5 which is not F2P.
Nobody in their right mind labelled Halo Infinite "runaway success"
Microsoft did.



2rfdHKF.jpg
 

Godot25

Banned
For a big Bethesda game? It's not, really.

For context, this is how BGS games' peak counts on Steam usually look like:
  • Fallout 4 = 472,962 (8 years ago)
  • Starfield = 330,723 (2023)
Now, let's see the nuances -- especially in the context of how small Steam was back then.
  • In 2015, when Fallout 4 hit 473K, Steam had a CCU of 8.5 million.
  • In 2023, when Starfield hit 330K, Steam has a CCU of 33 million.
So, Steam's CCU has increased by 388%. Meanwhile, Starfield's CCU has gone down by 30%. Ideally, it should have increased by at least 388%.

Now, there is a valid argument that Steam's CCU is low because of PC Game Pass. Currently it is at #12 on the most played game on PC, behind Destiny 2!

XeWsx4f.jpg


Also, looking at this poll on the purple site, it is very evident that the game underperformed.

RreOIKw.jpg


Overall, Starfield is at #27 on Steam's all-time peak list. A couple of games that had a higher CCU peak than Starfield: Hitman 2 and Life is Strange 2.

zb4MSlu.jpg
7MLFpGV.jpg


Before release, had anybody said that Starfield would have a smaller CCU than Hitman 2 and Life is Strange 2, they would got utterly mocked (and rightly so).
So let me get this straight
A: Game underperformed, because people on gaming forum thought it will have more CCU on Steam?
B: Game underperformed, because two games handed over free keys/had free weekends and because of that they have higher peak CCU on Steam

Brilliant analysis mate. :messenger_tears_of_joy::messenger_tears_of_joy::messenger_tears_of_joy:
Can't wait for more
 

Godot25

Banned
Microsoft did.



2rfdHKF.jpg

I'm talking about public sentiment. Fact that Halo Infinite would have most player in history of franchise was obvious to everybody at the moment they announced that multiplayer would be free-to-play.

I repeat again. Public sentiment was always "that's kinda low considering MP is free-to-play" and because Forza Horizon 5 had 18 million players at that time without free-to-play.
 

DrFigs

Member
For a big Bethesda game? It's not, really.

For context, this is how BGS games' peak counts on Steam usually look like:
  • Fallout 4 = 472,962 (8 years ago)
  • Starfield = 330,723 (2023)
Now, let's see the nuances -- especially in the context of how small Steam was back then.
  • In 2015, when Fallout 4 hit 473K, Steam had a CCU of 8.5 million.
  • In 2023, when Starfield hit 330K, Steam has a CCU of 33 million.
So, Steam's CCU has increased by 388%. Meanwhile, Starfield's CCU has gone down by 30%. Ideally, it should have increased by at least 388%.

Now, there is a valid argument that Steam's CCU is low because of PC Game Pass. Currently it is at #12 on the most played game on PC, behind Destiny 2!

XeWsx4f.jpg


Also, looking at this poll on the purple site, it is very evident that the game underperformed and below expectations.

RreOIKw.jpg


Overall, Starfield is at #27 on Steam's all-time peak list. A couple of games that had a higher CCU peak than Starfield: Hitman 2 and Life is Strange 2.

zb4MSlu.jpg
7MLFpGV.jpg


Before release, had anybody said that Starfield would have a smaller CCU than Hitman 2 and Life is Strange 2, they would got utterly mocked (and rightly so).
what is the source on that firs picture?
 
Top Bottom