Mavis Beacon?! Curse that computer program lol. I don't know how he made that slip up as piracy is bannable on just about any gaming site even gamefaqs. This couldn't have been the first site he's ever been to.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
- Status
Mavis Beacon?! Curse that computer program lol. I don't know how he made that slip up as piracy is bannable on just about any gaming site even gamefaqs. This couldn't have been the first site he's ever been to.
NotTheGuyYouKill
Member
I got linked here from somewhere else, and Jesus... this was a bloodbath.
But my God, the last few pages were hilarious. Bishop is drenched in the blood of the banned. It's amazing.
But my God, the last few pages were hilarious. Bishop is drenched in the blood of the banned. It's amazing.
Horseticuffs
Full werewolf off the buckle
Verily, this thread was elevated above even the angels themselves.
NinjaBoiX
Member
This. I don't really think there is ever a problem with simply looking at an attractive member of the opposite sex. It's when that look becomes a gawp that the problem arises.
Broder Salsa
Banned
One is pictures to masturbate to and the other is to laugh at people. Not sure why it's more acceptable (especially since most of the walmart shots are also of fat people in really tight clothes and stuff) but there's a clear difference.
IrishNinja
Member
...why is this graveyard open again
oh and sentry's banned now too, this is weird
oh and sentry's banned now too, this is weird
TheContact
Member
he got banned a few days ago, not sure why though, his post history didn't have anything bad
Yeah, both are kinda fucked up anyway.One is pictures to masturbate to and the other is to laugh at people. Not sure why it's more acceptable (especially since most of the walmart shots are also of fat people in really tight clothes and stuff) but there's a clear difference.
I'm sure there's someone, somehwere, masturbating to people of walmart, though.
Nah, looks like Rocky.
DON'T JUDGE ME
It is indeed Rocky.
shanshan310
Member
One is pictures to masturbate to and the other is to laugh at people. Not sure why it's more acceptable (especially since most of the walmart shots are also of fat people in really tight clothes and stuff) but there's a clear difference.
Yeah, I wouldn't consider either okay, both invasions of privacy. Creepshots kind of objectify women though, so I'd say they're a bit less acceptable.
LightofRohan
Member
Haha this is true
You never see people in those comments/threads defending them. But as soon as they are attractive, you get every person out of the woods, "HOW DARE YOU!!! YOU SHOULD BE BEATEN!"
SquiddyCracker
Banned
Sorry for whiteknighting here, but I think shanshan310 is correct.
SolidusDave
Member
I was at the beach yesterday and asked a topless hot chick to take a picture for me because I was alone.
After taking a few pictures of me she mentioned she didn't had any of herself during her vacation, but she didn't bring her camera to the beach.
I offered to take some photos of her and send them to her later.
She didn't want that.
So much for that consent option, this is NOT how I'll get pictures of topless women!
After taking a few pictures of me she mentioned she didn't had any of herself during her vacation, but she didn't bring her camera to the beach.
I offered to take some photos of her and send them to her later.
She didn't want that.
So much for that consent option, this is NOT how I'll get pictures of topless women!
(taking photos for me was supposed to be an ice-breaker but I was very nervous and her vacation was almost over and she didn't seem too interested anyway )
)I was on the beach yesterday and asked a topless hot chick to take a picture for me because I was alone.
After taking a few pictures of me she mentioned she didn't had any of herself during her vacation, but she didn't bring her camera to the beach.
I offered to take some photos of her and send them to her later.
She didn't want that.
So much for that consent option, this is not how I'll get pictures of topless women!
(taking photos for me was supposed to be an ice-breaker but I was very nervous and her vacation was almost over and she didn't seem interested
LOL nice try buddy.
SquiddyCracker
Banned
I was at the beach yesterday and asked a topless hot chick to take a picture for me because I was alone.
After taking a few pictures of me she mentioned she didn't had any of herself during her vacation, but she didn't bring her camera to the beach.
I offered to take some photos of her and send them to her later.
She didn't want that.
So much for that consent option, this is NOT how I'll get pictures of topless women!
(taking photos for me was supposed to be an ice-breaker but I was very nervous and her vacation was almost over and she didn't seem too interested anyway
But you tried!
See, if you had attempted to just straight-up snap photos of her, there was always the chance of her noticing it - and that would for certainty kill any chances you might have had with her.
Not this time it might not have turned out in your favour, but if you keep this up you might strike gold in the future - and in a completely moral way!
SolidusDave
Member
I swear I didn't realize what I was saying there. :lol
But in retrospect I thought it would fit nicely to this thread
Edit: Those were some nice boobs... Still took some mental shots for the spankbank, HAH!
perfectchaos007
Member
It's not only in pictures, apparently casual voyeurism has spread into video form. I was playing the youtube game ( starting with one vid and clicking on a "related video" after each video ) and eventually stumbled on this video. It's a stationary video camera watching a young male and female kissing in a public park. There is really no entertainment value in the video other than the sole purpose of creepily watching an unsuspecting couple spend some time together. I was truly weirded out by it.
SquiddyCracker
Banned
Damn, that is really creepy.
ReBurn
Gold Member
Did you watch the whole thing?
Casual voyeurism isn't exactly a new thing. People have been "people watchers" for years. Recording it to watch later is something else, though.
LightofRohan
Member
What creepy sick bastards. What's next, we'll have TV shows where the entire premise is just watching people in normal lives? What is this world coming to.
SquiddyCracker
Banned
What do you think the British government is putting up all those CCTV cameras for?
Once people get tired of paid actors pretending to be real in Big Brother, the next big thing will be watching CCTV footage of ordinary brits who aren't volunteering for the show!
Anton Sugar
Member
Nice.
Air Zombie Meat
Member
Haha, great idea. Good to see them getting some payback.
H.Protagonist
[-_-]/
Excellent! Very nice to see more fighting back on this kind of thing. Hadn't even really hoped that the creepers would face any real repercussions.
out0v0rder
Member
it looks like it's all public information they gave so yeah there shouldnt be anything wrong with that site posting that stuff
Shit just got real.
Anyway Reddit users post their personal infos or are they linked to their facebook pages, or what? (sorry, barely know Reddit, don't really know how it works).
free speech ftw
Baconsammy
Banned
Stop being gorgeous and these things won't happen to you. It's your fault. Actually, in your case they may be taking pics because of that thing attached to your head.
"But these pictures can't hurt anybody because nobody can be identified from them!" thought the photo takers.
And then the photographer was identity
Most humans are morons (and a huge %age of Redditors are as well).
I see the subreddit is now private. Victory?
They deserve this if they can't even cover their own tracks, lol
MoonLightWave
Member
Talk about overdoing it.
The creepshots are anymous for the most part no? Naming names are not and can ruin people's life, but I guess they deserverd it right?
I'm not trying to defend them or anything, but naming names to the public is overdoing it.
Huevos de Oro
Member
Hahaha, amazing.
Lucky you!
Baconsammy
Banned
Like people on Twitter that threaten the president, and their twitter name is their actual name. Darwin, you win again.
radios shipping overview
Member
Works for me. It's nice to see them being held accountable. If they were dumb enough to engage in that creepy stuff and also leave enough of an electronic trail to be tracked, then they get what they deserve.
- Status