Manos: The Hans of Fate
Banned
Chaos Theory was hands down the best in the series and I will fight anyone to the death who says otherwise.
The voice acting was awful for some reason. Beside the main leads, I just recall it being Really bad.
Chaos Theory was hands down the best in the series and I will fight anyone to the death who says otherwise.
The voice acting was awful for some reason. Beside the main leads, I just recall it being Really bad.
Oh my God.
I just imagined running through a battle in the forest with Promontory playing in the background.
Would be amazing.
Japanese accents were a bit rough, yeah.
God i miss that multiplayer.
Ugh. I hope this doesn't turn into Assassin's creed: warrior within
man I thought that as I said earlier, but then I came to feel that it would be stretching history too much for my tastes. Benjamin Franklin's role in history at this point was as a rousing diplomat and international celebrity, to say nothing of how old he was. He tinkered far less at the age he was during the Revolutionary War. He wasn't even in the country because he was participating in what remains the single most important diplomatic mission in American history.
Bringing him back would be too much revisionist history for me, even in a game about Mayan conspiracies and Pope Power Gods![]()
That's PT. I remember the Israel level was horrible.Wait maybe it's Pandora Tomorrow I'm thinking of. It had a level in Indonesia and Israel, was that PT or CT?
That's PT. I remember the Israel level was horrible.
Can I pre-emptively apologize if this game is offensive? I'm fucking stoked at the notion of playing as a native American, but even as a white dude I kind of cringe at that American flag backdrop. I know dude is probably half-Native American or whatever and I'm probably being too PC, but they really need to be careful with how they handle it. It's just a game, though, right?
I hope they go all-in concerning the role Native-Americans played in the revolution. Besides who would you rather play as? A boring Anglo-Saxon colonist or a bad ass Native-American warrior?
It'll be interesting to see how this game performs for the series. This thread has half as many posts as the OT for Rev, and this is only a day old. Seems people really were a bit burnt out on that era.
It'll be interesting to see how this game performs for the series. This thread has half as many posts as the OT for Rev, and this is only a day old. Seems people really were a bit burnt out on that era.
Fuck man if you guys thought you collected feathers before you gonna be collecting them damn feathers now.
Everything is culturally insensitive to someone out there. Collect bottles of 'fire water' and so on.I feel like someone would complain about that being culturally insensitive.
You'd rather it be generic to maintain consistency, than break the mold and be awesome?I'm not too crazy about the boxart. Ey should use the other image of him standing there with the flag behind him instead. That pic is more consistent with the boxarts of 1 and 2
French Revolution would've been far more interesting.
is it just me, or are these two characters completely different?
http://i.imgur.com/1CAQ6.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/4lK2n.jpg
2 playable characters within the same timeline maybe? count me in.
is it just me, or are these two characters completely different?
http://i.imgur.com/1CAQ6.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/4lK2n.jpg
2 playable characters within the same timeline maybe? count me in.
is it just me, or are these two characters completely different?
http://i.imgur.com/1CAQ6.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/4lK2n.jpg
2 playable characters within the same timeline maybe? count me in.
They look pretty much the same to me only the top one looks alittle older. So probably the same thing as ezio where he ages over the course of the game. Its also a style change bewteen the two which lends alittle different flair to each pic.
They look pretty much the same to me only the top one looks alittle older. So probably the same thing as ezio where he ages over the course of the game. Its also a style change bewteen the two which lends alittle different flair to each pic.
It's been mentioned in this thread already, but the version that appears older is a rendition from comic artist Alex Ross that will appear on some subscriber issues of next months GI. It's very likely the same character.is it just me, or are these two characters completely different?
is it just me, or are these two characters completely different?
http://i.imgur.com/1CAQ6.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/4lK2n.jpg
2 playable characters within the same timeline maybe? count me in.
It's awesome how the tomahawks are shaped like the Assassins logo
My main hope for the new guy is that they atleast get a VA on the same level as Ezio's (Roger Craig Smith).
Dude has range.
Good point. Roger Craig Smith already is a legend in my book
You guys think Daniel Cross will show up in AC3? He was the main protagonist in The Fall. Apparently there is some mention of him in ACR. It'd be an interesting meeting... considering what happened in that series.
Is it just me, or does it look like the assassin has no hidden blade?
Looks the same to me, one is a sketch, probably an early one and the other is a render of the final design.
Shouldn't we compare Assassin's Creed to the Hitman games rather than SC?
Although, Hitman was always more of a puzzle game wrapped in an action/adventure, so....
There is probably some truth to this, but as it stands now, that's just pure speculation on your part. I'd consider it hard to relate towards an aging Syrian assassin, but that turned out okay, right?ACIII. But no, marketing showed that more people could connect to a dude during the "American revolution" than a female Asian protagonist.
I wouldn't say it was more personally appealing at all. There are plenty of core AC fans that wanted this setting, like, myself. Secondly, this Americanization argument makes no sense if you think about it with any serious consideration. You have an international team, whose previous games have taken place in Europe and the Middle East, taking on a 'pre-American' setting with a Native American protagonist. This screams 'Americanization' to you? Accompanied by a creative cop-out? I don't agree. This is as nonsensical as the 'Merica Fuck Yeah arguments this thread is littered with. Just so we are clear, I've already conceded that Ubisoft has the potential to make this trite and jingoistic, but I feel like an international team is a bit more cultured than that.This is why (however cliché it might be at this point) an Asian setting, or Egyptian setting, was not only more personally appealing to a lot of people, but also important as a contribution to the de-americanisation of video game culture.
It sounds really cool to run in trees and stuff, and I'm sure they are very confident in their decision, but judging by the location alone, I am disappointed and not surprised at all. Something that happens far too often in this industry.
I wouldn't say it was more personally appealing at all. There are plenty of core AC fans that wanted this setting, like, myself.
Secondly, this Americanization argument makes no sense if you think about it with any serious consideration. You have an international team, whose previous games have taken place in Europe and the Middle East, taking on a 'pre-American' setting with a Native American protagonist. This screams 'Americanization' to you? Accompanied by a creative cop-out? I don't agree. This is as nonsensical as the 'Merica Fuck Yeah arguments this thread is littered with. Just so we are clear, I've already concede Ubisoft has the potential to make this trite and jingoistic, but I feel like an international team is a bit more cultured than that.
The AC franchise, for me, has always been to potential to see the world in a different way, with locations that are not euro-anglo-american-centric. That is why this, judging by the setting only, seems so unappealing to me. Yes, the period certainly is interesting, but it is just so obviously playing into the white-anglo-american discourse the video game industry is already far too steeped in.
AC started off in totally different locations than was ever before considered for a game of its caliber and potential target audience. It sidestepped that discourse completely by going to Damascus and Jerusalem (and of course Constantinople in AssRev; fantastic choice). In ACII they went to Italy and the European setting of the Renaissance period; it was a great historical exploration of "our" past (that is, white, male, imperialistic, etc.), so I was hoping we might go beyond that world view for ACIII. But no, marketing showed that more people could connect to a dude during the "American revolution" than a female Asian protagonist.
This is why (however cliché it might be at this point) an Asian setting, or Egyptian setting, was not only more personally appealing to a lot of people, but also important as a contribution to the de-americanisation of video game culture.
It sounds really cool to run in trees and stuff, and I'm sure they are very confident in their decision, but judging by the location alone, I am disappointed and not surprised at all. Something that happens far too often in this industry.
Is it just me, or does it look like the assassin has no hidden blade?
It's awesome how the tomahawks are shaped like the Assassins logo
Most of the appeal of the AC games comes from roaming through beautiful, classic European cities.
They are going to have to do a hell of a lot of convincing if they expect me to think that going around in early America will be anywhere close to the same.
Pretty disappointed. Its an interesting setting, but my imagination, or lack thereof, isn't seeing how this could be good.