As I said AF seems dynamic on Xbox console. Sometimes the difference seems wider sometimes a bit less. Anyway, zooming in the DF shots, specular effects on the ground on series X are gone even in the short distance compared the ps5. Isn't it exactly a bit lower for my eyes if you care of such details
Post a shot with a flat texture comparing the ground Vs the ps5 to prove it at least, because you are not exactly the most trustful source for such things. From what I see the issue seems exactly the same in the DF picture.
I've stopped watching their comparison videos. Not so much for bias but since last year they seem okay with promoting the console warring even if they play innocent. I think omitting certain things play into that and creates more controversy. I get it, they get views out of it but I am done with it. I do still enjoy their technical breakdowns for exclusives and tech.
They lowered the resolution from 1440p to 1080p in the worst cases, it's not a minor thing. Though I don't get it why they did the same on ps5 when FPS was absolutely fine in the demo...
You can look up the patch history yourself if you want. The AF seems very similar now between both versions. Patch notes didn't specifically mention AF changes but they still improved a lot of stuff.
So there are patch updates in the game, nothing mentioned about AF improvement, in the DF capture I continue to see a worst AF but you persist to say they improved it because you "feel it". It's not that tough. Make a capture screen about both version where the ground texture is clearly visible and prove what you said. It's not like I imagine things. In the screen posted about the DF video, the mud on Series X has clearly less specular effects in a visible way even in the short distance, I don't know what's the point to deny the evidence.
I don't see it. I watched the entire video and the AF is almost the same. It was much worse before the patch.
You have to have special glasses to see a difference for Sony, it are very special and expensive glasses …
You guys are laughable. Until you are happy
There isn't clear evidence AF is improved, no one proved it but sure the problem are the Sony dude who pointed out is not the case looking at the last DF video. I don't understand if you have some glance issue or just too chilidish to admit it.
Just watch the video, there is no real difference. He also compares XSS and XSX, and you can see a clear difference there, and he also mentions that the AF is worse on XSS. So it's not like he entirely forgot to look at it. He just realized it's the same on PS5 and XSX.You guys are laughable. Until you are happy
No, what is going on in your head? The analysis is done by the experts but you ain't having any of it
You could really put your spare time into something more productive I feel but it's up to you.
It's time to go to bed for you, no more late nights!You guys are laughable. Until you are happy
Dynamic AF? WHAT!
Could be Youtube compression. Who knows.
Yeah game used dynamic AF even on PS3. Would explain why sometimes is less noticeable sometimes quite apparent.
It's time for people like you to be less pathetic and talk about concrete tech indeed to do just console war
It's not like if you repeat a thing it becomes more real eh. As I said just to need look the picture posted some page ago and you can easily how AF is not absolutely the same on series X. I haven't the tools to make a gif zoomed about the ground if someone has the time just did it but I'm frankly sad to hear spit out falsity based on the fanboyism.
The lowest resolution on both is like 1800p vs 1692Is that down to DSR? Depending on which areas and load they tested.
SX is still sharper with the more powerful gpu.
, but more pixels is more pixels.They're getting older now.
Why hasn't the tech experts picked up on this if its so easy to see? The reason is they're the same, just let it go you are wrong.It's time for people like you to be less pathetic and talk about concrete tech indeed to do just console war
This is funny, because before I got to this post I was thinking how predictable it is that every time Xbox has an advantage, however big or small, you can guarantee the usual suspects (of which you are one) will rush to pile in with as much noise and deflection as possible to drown out any positivity,
Can you point out when I ever said in any of my post what is it more important graphic wise? It's practically the whole thread where a bunch of people continue to repeat AF is the same both without prove anything when it's blatantly false and I'm like them because I just repeat to stop to spread out falsity?This is funny, because before I got to this post I was thinking how predictable it is that every time Xbox has an advantage, however big or small, you can guarantee the usual suspects (of which you are one) will rush to pile in with as much noise and deflection as possible to drown out any positivity,
Like clockwork. Do you all distribute a list among yourselves to work from?
If scenario A happens say resolution is more important than frame rate.
If scenario B happens say frame rate is more important than resolution
If all else fails, say ‘parity is a win!’. Even when the Xbox version is better, say it’s not better enough
Pre launch Xbox rabid fans hype and FUD towards PS5… incredible quality gap predicted… do they maths
. Reaping vs sowing and all that.
Tom is blind, this is a known fact by now.
People asked for screenshots, 2 days ago.
Pre launch Xbox rabid fans hype and FUD towards PS5… incredible quality gap predicted… do they maths
Also game quality wise you are comparing a $499 console with a $399 one hehe. Sure the Series S is even cheaper but the quality gap there is also noticeably wider and often features are missing and/or reduced.
Distributor packed it up as if it was a game as a service, developers clearly had another plan. It's a solid action RPG with a good chunk of content.
They're getting desperate when they bring up the $399 model. But they don't mention (off the top of my head) your limited to 5 day one releases for the whole life of the Ps5 and then it ends up costing more
The fuck you talking about now. People who said ps5 would been 32 GB RAM and their SSD will save the industry was a common argumentation in the forum now?
They know, just flinging stuff at the wall and seeing what sticks.
We now gonna ignore how that SSD was praised like the second coming of Jesus before release? At least be consistent
If you’re targeting certain people (reap vs sow) who said stuff that annoyed you consider taking it to private message perhaps, so the rest of us don’t have to read the same tedious and weak warrioring over and over in every thread where the Xbox version is better?Pre launch Xbox rabid fans hype and FUD towards PS5… incredible quality gap predicted… do they maths
Also game quality wise you are comparing a $499 console with a $399 one hehe. Sure the Series S is even cheaper but the quality gap there is also noticeably wider and often features are missing and/or reduced.
Not targeting people, it is just the nature of the discourse. Am I disagreeing with evidence? No. Am I shitting on the XSX version no?
.
It never equal the level of absurdity spit out about the unreachable brute power inside the series X compared the ps5 which still screw the mind of many fansWe now gonna ignore how that SSD was praised like the second coming of Jesus before release? At least be consistent
Lol better. Thanks to God it's arrived him to make peace the 2 sides with his indisputable verdict. Have higher resolution is not necessarily a win if you have there other graphic assets compromised, though I wasn't exactly here to claim the winner as you. Even the same Tom talked how impossible is it to distinguish the 2 resolution without a proper capture shots in the right spot, but I guess someone just hear what he want to listen. Take your victory in the resolution if it's that what counts more about such discussion, what I can say. But at least not pretend to appear as the peacemaker, thanks.
