Thats not a gameplay that's cutscene . Once game starts it goes back to 60
LMAO, even with toolkit issues XSX runs better with RT enabled than PS5. Guess when they finalized it, the true console war will start.
Starting to see a trend there, at least for early games.
It seems whenever raytracing is involved, xbox does a little better. If the game has no raytracing, ps5 does a little better.
In the video they say the drop on the x in 120 mode is only during one scene.
Yes, very slight edge for PS5, overall I think Series X runs this game a bit better, but both perform well enough that nobody will actually care.
I hesitate to say it's a W for team green, more like a W for gamers.
It is not the dead narrative. I mean it wasn't dead last week, suddenly after weekend when XSX started to run games better - the narrative is dead? LMAOStop trying to push the 'toolkit' narrative. It's already dead in the water.
Cutscene bro.
Yes! Stand down warrior, feel proud. THIS is your day. Reconvene at the Holy playstation church for further instruction.Did PS5 win again?
We could but that's not a gameplay. Thats a set piece and a cutscene where xsx gpu pulls ahead of ps5 for 1 second.
It seems to me Xsx does gpu related tasks better while ps5 does cpu related tasks better
The series s version is a total mess! Low quality textures, no RT, no 120hz mode no shadows etc
dafuq?!
are you not going to put this thread on ignore like the last one and do a dash?
Interesting. Though I know nothing about game engines.It’s not exactly the same. They change the internal resolution buffer, but the screen doesn’t change resolution.
It lacks RT. XSX has RT on the right, S - doesn't.Those Series S do look quite bad. Well, I guess the money/performance ratio makes up for that a bit. Performance is not free.
Maybe I'll just put you on ignore instead.
The series s version is a total mess! Low quality textures, no RT, no 120hz mode no shadows etc
dafuq?!
3 different scenes, all of them gameplay where the PS5 drops massively, while the Series X is solid 60fps.We could but that's not a gameplay. Thats a set piece and a cutscene where xsx gpu pulls ahead of ps5 for 1 second.
It seems to me Xsx does gpu related tasks better while ps5 does cpu related tasks better
So just going to ignore how the PS5 drops to near 30 fps in raytracing, 60fps mode but the XsX has zero issues?
Yes, very slight edge for PS5, overall I think Series X runs this game a bit better, but both perform well enough that nobody will actually care.
I hesitate to say it's a W for team green, more like a W for gamers.
The performance on XSX is in general better. They actually say that on the video.Yes, very slight edge for PS5, overall I think Series X runs this game a bit better, but both perform well enough that nobody will actually care.
I hesitate to say it's a W for team green, more like a W for gamers.
I don’t really care who wins, but I still come to these threads for these type of reality denying posts.Thats not a gameplay that's cutscene . Once game starts it goes back to 60
Mind you this scene has been mentioned by vgtech a probably bug but listen here we already started to say it's because series X is more powerful. Ok.
They say that in 60hz mode, in 120 the PS5 does better. Both consoles did great.The performance on XSX is in general better. They actually say that on the video.
And we know who will win (the switch).LMAO, even with toolkit issues XSX runs better with RT enabled than PS5. Guess when they finalized it, the true console war will start.
It's even, depends on what modes you have. Both can be fixed to be a locked 60 FPS as both issues seem to be optimization related.i my opinion this one is a win for xsx
He looks like Harvey Dent with RT shadows.The series s version is a total mess! Low quality textures, no RT, no 120hz mode no shadows etc
dafuq?!
Interesting. Though I know nothing about game engines.
It lacks RT. XSX has RT on the right, S - doesn't.
That's a set piece which means is different that gameplay. Set piece and cutscenes use different assets most of times.
this is gameplay
Nobel prize for Mark Cerny!
Game looks amazing on both consoles. Most of us don't have the latest TVs for 120, so 4K/60 over a lower resolution/less detail/120 all day. Thanks DF!
I am a bit disappointed on how DF treats the Series S. Whenever Switch multiplats underperformed, you always heard "well it's impressive for a portable". Well for the price of entry, the Series S is still "impressive for the price", can run these latest games decently enough.
Now we are applying handicaps to these comparisons lolInteresting i think we all know that due to extra cu on series x it would so well for raytracing and considering ps5 only has 32cu and only drops to around 40fps mark thats still quite remarkable! And with 120fps mode ps5 pretty much shines on this one. So to me id call this a draw
Watch the video. They say that both machines are almost identical in performance in 120 mode with the exception of one scene where the xbox dives. In Contrast with 60 fps RT mode they are the same about 95% of the time with the PS5 suffering drops the other 5%. Substantial... no, but more than one occurrence.Mind you this scene has been mentioned by vgtech a probably bug but listen here we already started to say it's because series X is more powerful. Ok.
Lol Sony fans breaking down on this oneThat's a set piece which means is different that gameplay. Set piece and cutscenes use different assets most of times.
It is not the dead narrative. I mean it wasn't dead last week, suddenly after weekend when XSX started to run games better - the narrative is dead? LMAO But it seems XSX really have some issues with 120hz mode.
I don’t think folks that play on PS should be upset at all. They were told they were going to get smoked and it hasn’t happened yet. If I played primarily on a console it would be the PS5 just for the controller.Lol Sony fans breaking down on this one