• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Hillary Clinton on Sanders: 'I'm not even sure he is a Democract'

Status
Not open for further replies.

marrec

Banned
Because it's a straight up Trump-esque semantic dodge. Shes knows what 'democrat' means in the context of the two party system, modern politics, and an election cycle, and so does everyone else. But there she is, clearly implying that Bernie isn't someone that left-leaning Americans should be voting for, while leaving the door open for, "What? I never said THAT!"

"I said 'their' not 'they're'! Don't you people know what the Oxford comma is?!?!"

'Petty' is a good word for it.

You're really reading a lot into a question that was specifically about Bernie's support of down party tickets in the Democratic establishment.

They weren't asking about his ideology, they were asked about his party affiliation.
 
I can understand why someone would agree with "Hillary isn't a liberal" or "Hillary isn't a progressive."

"Hillary isn't a democrat" though? Nah, fuck that. She's as blue as they come. An absolute party loyalist. If you don't think that the Democratic party is liberal enough, then that's fine, but I can't see any interpretation of the last few years of politics that doesn't establish Clinton as firmly a democrat.
 
Because it's a straight up Trump-esque semantic dodge. Shes knows what 'democrat' means in the context of the two party system, modern politics, and an election cycle, and so does everyone else. But there she is, clearly implying that Bernie isn't someone that left-leaning Americans should be voting for, while leaving the door open for, "What? I never said THAT!"

"I said 'their' not 'they're'! Don't you people know what the Oxford comma is?!?!"

'Petty' is a good word for it.

No, Bernie Sanders literally isn't a member of the democratic party, and in a question about helping out down-ballot votes that's relevant.

I think if he were a full in party member you'd see less dumb shit from Sanders voters about going for Trump if Sanders doesn't win the primary.
 

Clefargle

Member
No actually, she really is.

Where exactly does this criticism come from? Why does the left eat its own so fucking often?

Ugh. Combined with the horseshit I read earlier (25% of Bernie voters would not vote for Hillary in a national election), this fucking stupid country deserves Trump.

I know, it's hilarious seeing people fall all over themselves to emulate the ideological purity of the Tea Party. A large group of the party of diversity is crowing for messianic figures like sanders that won't compromise with anyone after 8 years of obstructionism. It's fucking incredible that Clinton gets called a republican while she is to the left of Obama on many issues. Incredible
 
Yeah, there's some crazy halo effect going on here. Gotta hate what Hillary says and love what Bernie says. Even when they're the same thing.

Well I think some people get annoyed by it because they identify as democrats and see Bernie as, even if he's not technically a democrat, representing their positions more accurately than someone like Clinton. She's objectively correct, but they might be taking it more as "no he's not a democrat ideologically" and less "he's literally technically not a member of the Democratic party."
 

Maxim726X

Member
I can understand why someone would agree with "Hillary isn't a liberal" or "Hillary isn't a progressive."

"Hillary isn't a democrat" though? Nah, fuck that. She's as blue as they come. An absolute party loyalist. If you don't think that the Democratic party is liberal enough, then that's fine, but I can't see any interpretation of the last few years of politics that doesn't establish Clinton as firmly a democrat.

It's hysterical because that's one of the main arguments used against her- 'She's a lapdog for the DNC, stealing all of those superdelegates!'

And now, she isn't really a democrat. I feel like I've stepped into an alternate dimension sometimes.
 

Sanke__

Member
Awesome so now liberal democrats aren't real democrats in addition to moderate republicans not being real republicans

Fuck this shit
 

Kusagari

Member
He isn't.

He doesn't care about the party at all and will do nothing to help them down ticket. Even if Bernie wins the election he would likely harm chances at the house/senate by only focusing on himself.

And then he'll be stuck with a hostile congress and no way to get his one man revolution proposals done.
 
Because it's a straight up Trump-esque semantic dodge. Shes knows what 'democrat' means in the context of the two party system, modern politics, and an election cycle, and so does everyone else. But there she is, clearly implying that Bernie isn't someone that left-leaning Americans should be voting for, while leaving the door open for, "What? I never said THAT!"

"I said 'their' not 'they're'! Don't you people know what the Oxford comma is?!?!"

'Petty' is a good word for it.

I don't think you understand.

He's literally not a democrat, he does not care about the democratic party, and in turn there can be an argument if he actually wants the parties down ticket candidates to succeed.
 
Nothing quite like career politicians pulling out the 'my opponent is dishonest' rherotical hooks and gouging away.

It's not about dishonesty.

You're really reading a lot into a question that was specifically about Bernie's support of down party tickets in the Democratic establishment.

They weren't asking about his ideology, they were asked about his party affiliation.

It's this. You can be a maverick rebel all you want, but if you aren't supporting anyone else in the party you joined solely for the purposes of your presidential bid, how the hell do you think you are going to get any legislation passed?
 
She's right. He's not been a Democrat for long, and he's been doing it (I suspect), just to be eligible to run. I guarantee that if you'd have asked Hillary about Bernie being progressive she'd have said "yes" in a heartbeat.

People on here calling her petty for this...SMH. Bernie has even run against Democrats in VT (though not as frequently as he's run against GOP, and not in the last decade). He's been Independent for a looooooong time, and a friend to progressives for sure, but he hasn't been a Democrat, and I'd be amazed if ANYONE that's worked with or done work for the Democratic party would say anything different than what Hillary said.
 

Steel

Banned
Clinton's bringing it up because after WY it's a series of closed or semi-closed primaries in which there will be more affiliated Democrats voting

I mean in NY, which is completely closed, only new voters registered as Democratic before March 25th, or previously registered non—Democratic voters who changed their party affiliation to Democratic before October 25, 2015.

She's targeting the Democratic base.

She's not even really bringing it up. She was point-blank asked about it. She doesn't say that his policies don't belong in the democratic party, just that she thinks Sanders identifies himself as a democrat.
 

Kathian

Banned
Clearly all the people voting for him aren't either. So I guess they were telling the truth when they said they wouldn't vote for Clinton.
 
Because it's a straight up Trump-esque semantic dodge. Shes knows what 'democrat' means in the context of the two party system, modern politics, and an election cycle, and so does everyone else. But there she is, clearly implying that Bernie isn't someone that left-leaning Americans should be voting for, while leaving the door open for, "What? I never said THAT!"

"I said 'their' not 'they're'! Don't you people know what the Oxford comma is?!?!"

'Petty' is a good word for it.

If Bernie Sanders wanted people to consider him a democrat, he had quite a few decades to build up that cred. Instead, he chose to identify himself as an independent. Proudly. And I think that's awesome that he did. We need more independents. But I also think that it's fair game for Democrats to call him out on that. Records matter.

Hillary is only left in a relative sense.

Eveyone is only left in the relative sense. That's literally the only possibility.
 

sphagnum

Banned
Steel said:
Liberal, progressive and left are the same damn thing. What she's basically saying is that she doesn't know if Sanders really identifies with the democratic party, she doesn't really comment on whether or not his policies fit in the democratic party. They do.

I'm aware of what she's doing and she's not incorrect to do so.

But I refuse to use this stupid American political ideological scale because it obscures the nature of actual political philosophy. Liberal and left are not the same thing at all. Leftists believe in socialism, liberals believe in capitalism. Period. Yes I'm aware that that's not how the words are used here. We use it wrong. That's why I said she's an exemplary Democrat but not a leftist.

Relative to whom?

And where does Bernie fall on this spectrum?

Relative to the world. She is a centrist.

Bernie is a social democrat, i.e. moderately left.
 

marrec

Banned
Awesome so now liberal democrats aren't real democrats in addition to moderate republicans not being real republicans

Fuck this shit

No, this is literally about his political affiliation with the established two parties. Being a Democrat with a capital D means more than just having liberal viewpoints.
 

massoluk

Banned
I thought her answer is fair enough, he's been independent until last year.
But I thought that's his appeal for most of his supporters, that he's not your typical mainstream democrat.
 
Well I think some people get annoyed by it because they identify as democrats and see Bernie as, even if he's not technically a democrat, representing their positions more accurately than someone like Clinton. She's objectively correct, but they might be taking it more as "no he's not a democrat ideologically" and less "he's literally technically not a member of the Democratic party."

Yeah. I mean, I definitely get why people are reacting defensively. They're just doing it in a stupid way. If Hillary Clinton isn't liberal enough for someone, it's not because she's not a democrat. It's because Democrats aren't that liberal.
 

DarkKyo

Member
Because labels are so important when it comes to policy. If it wasn't for the this awful, unshakable, establishment system you wouldn't have to run as either terrible party. I really can't blame the guy.
 

Burt

Member
You're really reading a lot into a question that was specifically about Bernie's support of down party tickets in the Democratic establishment.

They weren't asking about his ideology, they were asked about his party affiliation.

I would be a lot less skeptical if I could believe that everyone involved didn't know how modern media works and which half sentence was going to make it as the headline.

No, Bernie Sanders literally isn't a member of the democratic party, and in a question about helping out down-ballot votes that's relevant.

I think if he were a full in party member you'd see less dumb shit from Sanders voters about going for Trump if Sanders doesn't win the primary.

If that's what she was referring to, party affiliation instead of the colloquially understood meaning of democrat as left-leaning or progressive, then there shouldn't be anything to be 'not sure' about.
 

Steel

Banned
Ah yes. Nearly identical voting records... Yet one is moderately left, the other a centrist.

Sorry, that doesn't make any goddamn sense.

This is going to be swerved to the Iraq war vote when what you're actually referring to is domestic policy, where they agree on what the problems are but not the solutions.
 

GaimeGuy

Volunteer Deputy Campaign Director, Obama for America '16
She's right, but this is not the time to say that. You say that and nip it in the bud early on. Not when we're chest deep in the Democratic Primary and he's your only remaining opponent. That just splinters the party.
 

Kusagari

Member
Because it's a straight up Trump-esque semantic dodge. Shes knows what 'democrat' means in the context of the two party system, modern politics, and an election cycle, and so does everyone else. But there she is, clearly implying that Bernie isn't someone that left-leaning Americans should be voting for, while leaving the door open for, "What? I never said THAT!"

"I said 'their' not 'they're'! Don't you people know what the Oxford comma is?!?!"

'Petty' is a good word for it.

She was point blank asked about him continuing to hem and haw on supporting down ticket races.

Her answer was perfectly fine in context. Bernie refused to join the party until it suited his needs and has done nothing that hints he has any desire to grow the party itself.
 

Feep

Banned
Ah yes. Nearly identical voting records... Yet one is moderately left, the other a centrist.

Sorry, that doesn't make any goddamn sense.
Bernie supporters try to make this about literally everything but policy, since they're nearly identical.

God I want to like Bernie, but people make it so hard sometimes.
 

marrec

Banned
I would be a lot less skeptical if I could believe that everyone involved didn't know how modern media works and which half sentence was going to make it as the headline.

She even goes so far as to say that he's bringing lots of great, important Democratic issues to the table. She's definitely not questioning his ideological purity.

I get that some people irrationally hate Clinton, but let's try to give her the benefit of the doubt with a simple question and answer such as this.
 
Do you know what liberalism means, historically?

In the last seven years, it's become calling everybody who isn't as liberal as you a neoliberal sellout because God forbid you understand the facts on the ground instead of being upset Obama didn't turn us into Sweden in his first six months.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom