PS4 with DLSS capabilities is way more believable than anything fanboys tried to push.
Rich from Digital Foundry said something similar and thats the route I believe they should follow. Reaching PS4 specs in Nvidia fashion would be more acceptable.
Meaning, a AMD octa-core jaguar = Nvidia ARM octa-core similar or better, 8 GDDR5 AMD = 8 GDDR5 Nvidia.
Probably hyperbole from gaming journalists. Most of the game journalist are Nintendo fanboys at their core. Rich from Digital Foundry said that is totally fine for Switch 2 to try demostrate their running Matrix U5 demo, but hype usually blind some folks.
The cuts back will be the key factor for the Matrix demostration. DLSS will only mitigate the native resolution. DLSS will not be used to increase texture res or polygon quality, shader.
I quite sure Digital Foundry wasn't invited for this main reason. They would destrone every lie/fake those leakers are pushing and put into reality what Nintendo really can do with their money/cost/size.
And lets be honesty. Saying Switch 2 is not near to PS5/Series X is not offensive at all. They can still push much more with PS4 or PS4PRO specs. We are talking about Nintendo here. Those guys do wonders with the hardware in mind.