This topic was already discussed in the NPD thread, and it's the same overall nonsense (not referring to your post here Kingfey, but I want to respond to something here). Not sure why this little bit had to be broken out to rehash.
I guarantee you Game Pass is most of those players. We can easily show it. Using data!
Forza Horizon 5 debuted this month at number 4 (all platforms), while Pokemon was number 3 with physical only sales being counted.
Well let's look at NPDs own publicly released charts:
Discover the most popular video games in the US for August 2023. Check out our list of the top 10 best-selling games and find out which games are taking the gaming world by storm.
www.npd.com
As you can see FH5 was indeed 4th this month, but is not in the top ten for the year. However! Pokemon is
already number 8 for the year with 12 days of physical only sales. However, number 9 is Spiderman Miles Morales, a game from 2020! And number 10 is FarCry 6, a game that received pretty mediocre reviews. So even though FH5 ranked fourth for the month, it was clearly not that close to Pokemon as it can't even beat out a game from 2020 during 2021, or a game that's been available for two months that, again, was not reviewed well at all. This wouldn't matter for a normal game but Forza Horizon is supposed to be Microsoft's
big franchise. And again, based on the early purchase hype, a handful of the usual posters were going off about how
huge this game was going to be.
Looks like that didn't pan out.
Also remember FarCry 6 was underperforming apparently:
https://metro.co.uk/2021/10/18/far-...on-far-cry-5-games-chart-16-october-15441755/
Yes that is UK only, but that is a decent enough sample size to gauge general gamer interest I would imagine. I doubt sales sentiment was vastly different in the U.S.
So basically there is still ZERO. EVIDENCE ... That sub services are growing the market. Sub services absolutely destroyed the music industry in terms of album sales. I have yet to see a shred of evidence anywhere, that people want to subscribe to a service and then spend MORE money purchasing the same games outside of that sub service. It's a complete baloney analysis backed up by nothing we can see (it was a massively down month overall, and Piscatella is talking about growing the market?) and anecdotal evidence on this very board backs up the idea of not buying games that are on GP. I've seen several forum members comment about no longer buying games because of GP (sorry don't bookmark the posts but if you read this board enough I know you've seen it) but I cannot recall a single person saying "I've signed up to GP and I am now buying more games than ever!"
Everything above is strictly based on the numbers we have. Nothing random pulled out of my rear. No desire for something to be some way when the numbers state otherwise. Just look at what the numbers are telling you and stop kissing corporate ass.
I just see so many people spouting off nonsense based on nothing like so:
To which I will always respond like Triumph here (timestamped for your pleasure):
And with that I am done once again with this silly argument based on this silly non-substantive statement.