while you make a good argument, i'd say look at netflix. it was the streaming king. now we have so much competition it's getting obnoxious with the amount of streaming services available. i do not think microsoft does nor will have a stranglehold on it.
If anything i hope it forces sony/nintendo to evolve and grow with the times. I don't want to see laws and anti competitive red tape stop growth.
Yes, but unlike with Netflix, games take three to four tears to make. Imagine a company that's worked on a game for three years and then is told by a streaming company they're not interested in their game, if the traditional model is replaced they're completely fucked.
What would have to happen is the developer would have to pitch a game to the streaming service before it begins production, and agree on a deal before hand, and the streaming company would likely require certain content be added or removed , and the game developer would not be in a position to refuse.
And SONY and Nintendo can't evolve or grow past Windows.
lol the dumbest thing I have ever read on this site.. Congrats Tiny Tim
Thank you Scrooge McDumbfuck.
Below is an excerpt from an article from today regarding an anti trust inquiry by the European Union regarding smart assistants from Amazon,Apple and Google; what Microsoft is doing is far more anti-competitive than what these companies are doing.
"European Union regulators are inquiring information from 400 companies to find out if there is a need to start antitrust investigations into Alexa, Siri, and Google Assistant.
The reason behind this inquiry is for the EU to understand if the market shares and control of data by these voice assistants are hurting competitors from coming up with alternative solutions. Antitrust investigations take place against popular companies that become huge enough to gain control of the market in such a way that it does not allow competition to thrive.
If any of the companies are fined for antitrust behavior, they are fined 10% of their global revenue, which can be massive in the case of companies like Amazon, Apple, and Google."
https://wccftech.com/eu-launches-antiturst-probe-of-alexa-siri-and-google-assistant/
Unbelievable. The best deal in gaming just got even better, yet here you are actually complaining about it and even saying MS sued for it. Pitiful.
What are you doing on a gaming forum? You obviously HATE gaming
I love gaming, and it is a great deal and I intend to subscribe to it myself, but I know this is bad for the industry and is going to hurt gaming in the end.
Phil warned that if Sony didn't step up it's game be more platform based rather than console based they were gonna get left behind. This is one example of what he meant.
SONY's platform isn't comparable to Windows. They can't possibly compete with that monopoly.
Gamepass Ultimate is $180 / year after introductory offers. Customers then spend secondary money on items; including buying games when they expire.
Where is your evidence that this represents a financial loss for MS? It's mostly old games they likely don't pay much for, and then their 1st party output. $180 a year is the price of 3 games, which is higher than the average gamer buys in a year.
They are loss leading with deals right now, which just about everyone in a subscription service does, but the service is designed to profit. It fails if they only get "whales" to use it to save money, it succeeds if it encourages MORE spending from customers who weren't spending $180+ per year. That's how all in one services work, and it's not an FTC violation.
Yes the service is designed to profit,but it can only profit in the end due to Microsoft's monopoly with Windows being able to reach people all over the world, and they're taking a loss undercutting Nintendo and SONY.
Third time I'm asking this and I still haven't gotten an answer, but what it is with spelling SONY in all caps? I've seen it often, are you guys running a sect?