dreamstation
Member
Nope.Congrats Microsoft
Nope.Congrats Microsoft
I'm not a CoD fan, is there something special about MW2? Nostalgia or something?
I'm curious why Modern Warfare II is so much more wildly popular this year vs. previous years.
I'm not a CoD fan, is there something special about MW2? Nostalgia or something?
What else is there out now in that genre that’s competingI'm curious why Modern Warfare II is so much more wildly popular this year vs. previous years.
I'm not a CoD fan, is there something special about MW2? Nostalgia or something?
I mean the game originally came out 13 years ago, not sure if you were old enough in 2009 to have a cognitive conscious of understanding of what was going on at the time.Is MW2 actually considered any different in terms of quality, though? Like is it objectively a better game or something?
Dude, every big release is like that in the city(I I live there) going all the way back to 2004 for Halo 2 plastered on every block in mid-town. He’ll even all the way back in the summer of 97’ Final Fantasy had ads plastered in Time Square.I was in NYC for a week, returning home today, I couldn’t believe the amount of marketing this game has in USA, those giant banners at Times Square have to be expensive AF, also, every other tv commercial was MW, shit’s crazy.
Vice versa for me. I'll buy it as soon as the deal is completed.I will buy it when the CMA reject the deal
Feels good not being a normalcasual.Bizzare to me, but I'm def out of touch and glad to be
I am just going to say that while I agree that WW2 is terrible I would have to disagree with the Cold War.People don’t like ww2 weapons or Vietnam weapons.
No. Its the multiplayer, and the modern setting, that drives sales.So good cod campaign actually sells?
It’s the name, modern setting, and their marketing budget.I'm curious why Modern Warfare II is so much more wildly popular this year vs. previous years.
I'm not a CoD fan, is there something special about MW2? Nostalgia or something?
I mean the game originally came out 13 years ago, not sure if you were old enough in 2009 to have a cognitive conscious of understanding of what was going on at the time.
It’s the direct sequel to COD 4 but its the 6th installment in the COD franchise.
Dude, every big release is like that in the city(I I live there) going all the way back to 2004 for Halo 2 plastered on every block in mid-town. He’ll even all the way back in the summer of 97’ Final Fantasy had ads plastered in Time Square.
This didnt happen with 2019. Why do you think it will happen with this?Oh yeah and Warzone 2, because once Warzone 2 launches you can bet MP will literary drop dead.
CoD MP is nothing more than a way to unlock your attachments so you’re ready for Warzone 2 meta.
It did happen. MP obviously has a player base but it's nowhere near Warzone's player base and that's a fact.This didnt happen with 2019. Why do you think it will happen with this?
2019 is still going strong, well it was until last Friday. your saying ten million players roughly are going to drop the game in less than 3 weeks? People love to spin a narrative that this game is dying somehow.
Official update from Activision Blizzard. New all-time record set for number of players online for the opening weekend & number of hours played through opening weekend.
Grossed $800M through opening weekend instead of the rumored $600M.
Modern Warfare II Tops $800 Million Sell-Through in Three Days, Delivers Largest Opening Weekend in Franchise History
Activision’s Call of Duty®: Modern Warfare® II has become the #1 top-selling opening weekend ever in the franchise, delivering more than $800 millionwww.businesswire.com
Obviously one of the biggest FTP titles has a larger player base. You said the release of warzone killed the traditional MP base, and this will do the same. I beg to differ.It did happen. MP obviously has a player base but it's nowhere near Warzone's player base and that's a fact.
Wait... they don't do that already?Activision could have launched literal shit in a case with Modern Warfare 2 scribbled on it, and it would have sold the same.
Same thing will happen, Warzone 2 will release and nobody will stream multiplayer anymore and youtube videos will be all about Warzone just like last year.Obviously one of the biggest FTP titles has a larger player base. You said the release of warzone killed the traditional MP base, and this will do the same. I beg to differ.
$800 million dollars says different.Same thing will happen, Warzone 2 will release and nobody will stream multiplayer anymore and youtube videos will be all about Warzone just like last year.
Yes there will be people playing multiplayer but it’ll be peanuts compared to Warzone. Sure it’s free to play but you’re also underestimating how many folks bought Modern Warfare 2 because of Warzone 2 and I’m willing to bet that number is way greater than people think.
Thing is Activision is smart about how they can sell you a $70 traditional CoD and give you a Free to Play MTX game as well, by intertwining the two together.
Fact of the matter is Warzone is Call of Duty, MP is an afterthought and it’s execution is tied to Warzone, just look how the game is designed (small maps big maps) all tied to the Warzone map if that ain’t evidence enough I don’t know what to tell you.
If Warzone didn’t exist, I think the traditional CoD formula would be hurting big time, mainly because all of the innovations for that style of game have been exhausted and in a lot of cases not executed as well as they did in the past.
Basically CoD/Warzone is replicating the FIFA/FUT model. They are having their cake and eating it. FIFA (or whatever EA call it next) is in a strong position to keep doing that as they have all the official licenses, so it makes it hard for a competitor to come in and take their place, but like CoD competitors have been faltering too. However, I think someone could eventually out 'Warzone' CoD and if that is free to play, it could seriously diminish CoD's stranglehold on this space.Same thing will happen, Warzone 2 will release and nobody will stream multiplayer anymore and youtube videos will be all about Warzone just like last year.
Yes there will be people playing multiplayer but it’ll be peanuts compared to Warzone. Sure it’s free to play but you’re also underestimating how many folks bought Modern Warfare 2 because of Warzone 2 and I’m willing to bet that number is way greater than people think.
Thing is Activision is smart about how they can sell you a $70 traditional CoD and give you a Free to Play MTX game as well, by intertwining the two together.
Fact of the matter is Warzone is Call of Duty, MP is an afterthought and it’s execution is tied to Warzone, just look how the game is designed (small maps big maps) all tied to the Warzone map if that ain’t evidence enough I don’t know what to tell you.
If Warzone didn’t exist, I think the traditional CoD formula would be hurting big time, mainly because all of the innovations for that style of game have been exhausted and in a lot of cases not executed as well as they did in the past.
They might as well. Could save a ton on production costs.Wait... they don't do that already?
Yeah but you're assuming $800 million dollars is because of their amazing multiplayer and it's just not the case.$800 million dollars says different.
Like i just said above, 2 million daily players is hardly peanuts. That dwarfs 99% of multiplayer titles out there, most dev's would kill to have that player base.
The fact that warzone is super successful doesn't take away from the fact the traditional MP is very much alive and kicking. COD has been doing numbers for years, don't know why you'd think it would be dead if it wasn't for warzone.
Edit: Who give a shit a streamers? 90% of COD's traditional player base probably doesn't even know what twitch is. The disconnect between the mass market and us nerds is real.
Hogwash. Show me any COD that had 20 million daily players 2 years after launch.Yeah but you're assuming $800 million dollars is because of their amazing multiplayer and it's just not the case.
Just look at their marketing campaign...
1) Release Campaign before MP. Now people are talking about a mediocre campaign and I'm sure the MW2 campaign is the most played campaign in CoD history just the way they released it.
2) Release MP, we'll give you 2 weeks to grind out camos and level up your guns for your attachments for (Warzone). MP itself is nothing special, in fact it's lacking quite a bit of features compared to older MPs.
3) Warzone 2 (The main course.)
Now, if I'm a Warzone only player. Guess what...I'll be hurting. Because if I want to unlock attachments quick I need that MP.
Like I said, these things are much deeper but we all see what the real Call of Duty attraction is and it's Warzone. MP design is dictated by Warzone and that's it.
Warzone at one point had 150 million players...so yes your 2 million is peanuts in comparison. Keep in mind old school CoDs were averaging around 20 to 30 million players on MP, so in comparison you can see MP took a hit and Warzone put Call of Duty on a whole new plane brother.
I'm talking about their peak, show me a CoD after 2 years that average 2 million daily without Warzone. Because if you don't think Warzone has added a whole lot of new Call of Duty players you're out of your mind, and because of that and Activision's model you may see an increase across the board but mainly it's because of Warzone.Hogwash. Show me any COD that had 20 million daily players 2 years after launch.
why where vangaurd sales in the shitter by cod standards then if like you say people only buy it because warzone?I'm talking about their peak, show me a CoD after 2 years that average 2 million daily without Warzone. Because if you don't think Warzone has added a whole lot of new Call of Duty players you're out of your mind, and because of that and Activision's model you may see an increase across the board but mainly it's because of Warzone.
Call of Duty without Warzone might be in the same shoes as Battlefield, not to that extreme because Battlefield really tanked but it would be on a slump. But in comparison to other games obviously it still the most successful shooter period.
Personally, I think Vanguard was not a good Call of Duty game and I don't think people really wanted a World War 2 theme. Warzone also suffered by the Vanguard overhaul.why where vangard sales in the shitter by cod standards then if lile you say people only buy it because warzone?
It'll be dead in 2 weeks though. Apparently."never heard of this Call of Duty. Is this some kind of "must have" videogame?" - Xbox
still probably biggest franchise in videogames. All those ppl who skipped Vanguard were just biding their time till the next title... and this is the result. Love it or Hate it, it's still COD and does what it does pretty damn good.
I'm curious why Modern Warfare II is so much more wildly popular this year vs. previous years.
I'm not a CoD fan, is there something special about MW2? Nostalgia or something?
Because MW 2019 was a return to form for the series and there was a lot of hype for its direct followup. Black Ops and Vanguard were pretty much filler compared to how awesome MW 2019 was.I'm curious why Modern Warfare II is so much more wildly popular this year vs. previous years.
I'm not a CoD fan, is there something special about MW2? Nostalgia or something?