Otakumegane
Member
They can both audiences if they make the right moves to target both audiences with whatever plans they announce next.
The last time they tried to chase both rabbits we got the WiiU.
They can both audiences if they make the right moves to target both audiences with whatever plans they announce next.
A few sold stock while speculation was at an all-time high (before the Q3 results, stock was high because of speculation for emerging markets / China news / major change).
But others are in it for the long haul / for the reliable dividends. Some are waiting for the stock to skyrocket on a possible announcement of mobile related stuff.
Regardless if Nintendo will actually make any money on mobile, the stock will perform well in response to Nintendo chasing the bubble.
If anything they need MORE staff. Hardware is always ready, software is not. If they software had been ready, I bet the WiiU could have launched a year earlier.
They're having a really hard time because they just have no 3rd party support behind them.
So you don't think Iwata is responsible for the predicament they are currently in? That he didn't make some poor decisions? When I hear fall guy, I think of someone that isn't really responsible, and is taking the blame. Do you really think Iwata fits this bill?
Valve + Nintendo is the answer
Best of both worlds, unmatched online services with unmatched first party development and franchises..
There is zero evidence this is the case but Iwata should send some strippers with knives to Gabe Newell immediately
You do realize that's one of the major points he's planning to address in the meeting, right?They really are in such a hole, though, as the Wii U only released a year ago and looks like it could tank completely. That's a ton of R&D money wasted, and a MASSIVE write-down on inventory, too. They probably have 6 million more WiiU already manufactured. A write down of even $100 dollars on each of those... Do the maths. It's not pretty.
On the other side, the 3DS has already peaked. It just had its best year of software yet sales are slowing, and it fell far below expectations. They do not have a new handheld coming out to remedy this. Therefore the 3DS will be far less able to offset the Wii U losses this year, and the Wii U losses will most likely be bigger, or the same.
Basically, when an investor asks this question of Iwata at the investor / strategy meeting:
'Mr. Iwata, what is your short term plan to ensure we do not suffer another two years of annual losses following the last three'
the point is that he will have no answer at all.
The last time they tried to chase both rabbits we got the WiiU.
These two do not mix well at all.
Valve's consumer base doesn't buy games for more than 50 cents and Nintendo software never drops in price.
The last time they tried to chase both rabbits we got the WiiU.
Oh, I absolutely agree that they don't mix at all, but you reason is crap.These two do not mix well at all.
Valve's consumer base doesn't buy games for more than 50 cents and Nintendo software never drops in price.
Maybe they can test the waters by releasing Bayonetta 2 on Ps4 and Xbone.
Please Nintendo.....
Are love hotels the places where you can pay women to hug and cuddle with you?I hope Nintendo stops making games altogether and gets back into love hotels. Mario-themed love hotels.
Ok serious question, how is Nintendo going to make money before they try again with a new console(s)?
They already released Pokemon and Mario so what's left? Zelda? And if that game is expensive to make?
Otherwise, can we look forward to another year of losses?
Oh, I absolutely agree that they don't mix at all, but you reason is crap.
The real problem is that I don't see how a company like Nintendo, which is almost monolithically static, traditional and conservative in the way it runs its business, could find any common ground with Valve.
Hoo boy, another doom thread.
I wonder when we'll get some port begging for games like Bayo...
WELP
Imagine paying Bowser to cuddle with you.Are love hotels the places where you can pay women to hug and cuddle with you?
-7%. Don't know why it isn't plunging more. hmm
The opposite is true. The companies are strong in different areas, so pooling their resources would be a benefit to both since there's no real area they cross to create a conflict.It's much more simple:
Nintendo still makes single player games. Valve doesn't. Their two philosophies are incompatible with each other. Nintendo is still interested in capturing hard-core gamers with solid single player campaigns like Zelda and Mario. Valve has, for all intents and purposes, internally cancelled Half Life 3, and is propping up micro-transaction-filled multiplayer games like Dota 2 and Team Fortress 2.
Hoo boy, another doom thread.
It's much more simple:
Nintendo still makes single player games. Valve doesn't. Their two philosophies are incompatible with each other. Nintendo is still interested in capturing hard-core gamers with solid single player campaigns like Zelda and Mario. Valve has, for all intents and purposes, internally cancelled Half Life 3, and is propping up micro-transaction-filled multiplayer games like Dota 2 and Team Fortress 2.
If apple bought them I think I'd have to start drinking
Nintendo is also going to be making those micro-transaction filled games soon enough in all likelihood.
Nintendo should just pawn off their old and/or 5fth-tier IPs.
If they sell Ice Climbers, StarTropics, Star Fox, F-Zero, FlingSmash, Duck Hunt, Clu Clu Land, Animal Crossing, Metroid, Mother, Ice Hockey, Hogan's Alley, Odama, Batallion Wars, and Famicon Detective Club then i'm pretty sure they'd have more than enough to last another 15-20 years.
Hoo boy, another doom thread.
I wonder when we'll get some port begging for games like Bayo...
WELP
Don't fire me up now.Imagine paying Bowser to cuddle with you.
That's not even remotely true. But even if it was, that would be at most a reason to consider them complementary, not incompatible.It's much more simple:
Nintendo still makes single player games. Valve doesn't.
It's much more simple:
Nintendo still makes single player games. Valve doesn't. Their two philosophies are incompatible with each other. Nintendo is still interested in capturing hard-core gamers with solid single player campaigns like Zelda and Mario. Valve has, for all intents and purposes, internally cancelled Half Life 3, and is propping up micro-transaction-filled multiplayer games like Dota 2 and Team Fortress 2.
Celebratory wine, I hope
Probably because Japanese investors have had time to absorb the shock. Nintendo's ADR shares in America dipped first on Friday and everyone's had the weekend to let it settle in and not make a hasty decision.-7%. Don't know why it isn't plunging more. hmm
-7%. Don't know why it isn't plunging more. hmm
They are a company with a history beyond the WiiU and a staff filled with brilliant minds.
Don't expect more of a change than this until their next idea fails or succeeds.
Valve + Nintendo is the answer
Best of both worlds, unmatched online services with unmatched first party development and franchises..
There is zero evidence this is the case but Iwata should send some strippers with knives to Gabe Newell immediately
Hah, all you weirdos that like Nintendo being bought out, go vote on GFAQ'S POTD.
You do realize that's one of the major points he's planning to address in the meeting, right?
Also, Nintendo could still make some money off the leftover Wii U's by selling them at a cheaper price even if its without the controller and try to do something like releasing vc and eshop games on mobile to make some extra money while they work on their other plans.
They would have to follow the casuals to mobile and use consoles for the core audience rather than trying to target both with one devices.
Dude, when a companies shares plunge 18% of course you're going to get a doom thread!
Shares are back up.
Nope, Nintendo can do this on their own but they should hire people from Valve, Blizzard or Riot. Start to develop a smash bros f2p game for PC (Windows and Linux). Release it when its finished, or start with a good Beta. 1-2years later, when Smash Bros f2p has around 10-20mio active players, transform the Smash Bros.-client into a Nintendo storefront. Releasing some more PC focused online games and the great normal Nintendo games like Mario and Zelda should be on their PC client and on consoles.
Yes. That is actually the point I am making. That I cannot forsee any answer he would have that isn't bullshit that kicks the can down the road again, bar an immediate entrance into mobile, which I am convinced will not happen. (Not immediately, that is)