Negotiator101
Member
Both on offer, I'm not sure but would like an informed opinion?
My main issue with origins was how empty it was. After the initial areas, half the map has no quests and gives you no reason to visit it.Don't think even for a moment that the sequels are more refined, they just just add a lot of half hassed mechanics and controls are the same.
Odissey and valhalla have bigger maps with a lot of nothing in them aswell.My main issue with origins was how empty it was. After the initial areas, half the map has no quests and gives you no reason to visit it.
The opinions I heard say completely the opposite - that Odyssey is bloated and Valhalla is much better.after having recently been in your situation, I strongly prefered odyssey. Its less bloated and has a better story.
They are both bloated AF.The opinions I heard say completely the opposite - that Odyssey is bloated and Valhalla is much better.
I haven't played either yet but I guess "bloated" is how you could describe literally every Ubisoft game and it's just a matter of preference which one you'll like better. Probably the setting is the only meaningful factor here.
how anyone could say valhalla is less bloated than odyssey baffles my mind. I would say 80% of the content is just filler.The opinions I heard say completely the opposite - that Odyssey is bloated and Valhalla is much better.
I haven't played either yet but I guess "bloated" is how you could describe literally every Ubisoft game and it's just a matter of preference which one you'll like better. Probably the setting is the only meaningful factor here.
I never understood this one.Black Flag.
I never understood this one.
it’s just trailing missions and terrible story
That's about 10% of the game. The rest is super rad pirate shitI never understood this one.
it’s just trailing missions and terrible story
People love pirates, i didn't even tried it since he had the same shitty combat of the previous ones and no tropical location can make me forgive that.I never understood this one.
it’s just trailing missions and terrible story
This is the right answer. If you haven't played Origins, I'd suggest it over both Odyssey and Valhalla. Odyssey and Valhalla are a little closer, but I'd take Valhalla here.Origins without a doubt.
The only thing odissey do better is kassandra but bayek is cool too (a bit of a beta simp tho)
Combat is trash in all 3 but i think origins has the less shitty one.
Main plot and side characters are trash in all 3 tbh, odissey and valhalla start better but they become a complete slog after a while.
Also egypt is by far the better location that doesn't look copy and paste and has a strong identity.
Don't think even for a moment that the sequels are more refined, they just just add a lot of half hassed mechanics and controls are the same (if i remember well parkour is also slightly better on origins but not sure about that)
How did you reach that conclusion? They're near identical.Odyssey on Series X is much better than Odyssey on PS5.
The Xbox version uses the One X version as a base, which gives it a higher resolution throughout since the One X version was better than the PS4 version.How did you reach that conclusion? They're near identical.