Freelance Yakuza
Member
What do you think GAF?
Edit:
Yeah, I should have written the title differently, now I'm going to be mocked for asking this
Last edited:
Wait until you find out that laughter in sitcoms is staged.
Wait until you find out that laughter in sitcoms is staged.
That shit was hilarious.Quite common when it comes to these things sadly, even phil seemed a tad weirded out when they cheered after the closure question.
That's funny lol. I'm going to have to look at that.Quite common when it comes to these things sadly, even phil seemed a tad weirded out when they cheered after the closure question.
Exactly this, which makes the excuses that this is commonplace weird to me. Yes, sure, a company hyping its own event is commonplace, but for a media outlet, whose supposed role is to inform the consumer, to be shilling for a company in this way just doesn't seem right.A 3rd party company that reviews games shouldn't really be doing this. Dont care if its normal, your meant to be an unbiased gaming company that reviews games on all platforms, you shouldnt be involved with the crowd when working with another platform.
Might not be real but if it is thats what i think
Bro, this is a common occurrence, not tinfoilery.
These lights have existed for years btw:Nothing is authentic anymore.
Exactly this, which makes the excuses that this is commonplace weird to me. Yes, sure, a company hyping its own event is commonplace, but for a media outlet, whose supposed role is to inform the consumer, to be shilling for a company in this way just doesn't seem right.
The question is who was turning it on for studio closures?These lights have existed for years btw:
![]()
A 3rd party company that reviews games shouldn't really be doing this. Dont care if its normal, your meant to be an unbiased gaming company that reviews games on all platforms, you shouldnt be involved with the crowd when working with another platform.
Might not be real but if it is thats what i think
The issue they probably encountered was twofold. 1) They didn't want dead silence after hearing that and 2) There's no audience prompt to match that type of conversation.The question is who was turning it on for studio closures?
They should have had the "awwwwww" promt.The issue they probably encountered was twofold. 1) They didn't want dead silence after hearing that and 2) There's no audience prompt to match that type of conversation.
The best solution was to wait for Phil to say something positive at the very end and place a cheer at that moment, which honestly barely half the crowd even cheered at that when listening to it. There were even a few 'oooohs' which almost sounded boo-like.
They should have had the "awwwwww" promt.![]()
All I see is a blue audience, was this taken at the event?
Exactly this, which makes the excuses that this is commonplace weird to me. Yes, sure, a company hyping its own event is commonplace, but for a media outlet, whose supposed role is to inform the consumer, to be shilling for a company in this way just doesn't seem right.
What do you think GAF?
Thought the same thing about putting employees/staged people/etc into the audience to start clapping/cheer to be picked up by the mics and start a reaction was/is a thing too. You can always tell when it's genuine and when it's forced/faked.Not surprising at all. This is pretty standard stuff for live events. I’ve been to dozens of E3 live interviews and I’d say almost half of the time the audience is prepped beforehand. Though I’ve never heard of the “loudest cheerleader” getting some prize or something. That sounds either made up or incredibly desperate.
Either way. It’s dumb and kind of slimy.