Hmm you think so? Honestly if it reaches the highs of Crack in Time and Deadlocked (I SAID WHAT I SAID) I can see it reaching above 90 but I’m more in the 85-89 camp myself.It's gonna hit at least 90 for sure. Looks AWESOME.
The game looks amazing so unless some reviewers will have a problem with things like length of the story mode I don't see it not getting top and near top scores. But we'll see.Hmm you think so? Honestly if it reaches the highs of Crack in Time and Deadlocked (I SAID WHAT I SAID) I can see it reaching above 90 but I’m more in the 85-89 camp myself.
That is exactly the score I was guessing. I figure it will be a good game so a high 80s or barely 90s ,polished but nothing truly groundbreaking.91, i was thinking something in the 80's but idk its like those launch titles for console the exclusive ones like demon's souls and breath of the wild. Those titles tend to score a bit higher to make more console sales. Its not a launch title but it was marketed strongly to sell the next gen console experience for PS5. I predict high score.
I've noticed things like this has tarnished reviews of some cult classics. I think one of the big reasons for that back then was how reviewing companies did assignments. It was a musical chairs thing back then and sometimes you'd end up with a sports guy or complete newbie journalist reviewing a game like Godhand or No More Heroes, or the shooter guy reviewing a Mario game.All depends really on how jaded each reviewer is. I feel like many of them forget how to just simply enjoy a game for what it is. Most reviews seem to be bitching about things they want in the game rather than what is in the actual game. Doesn't mean that games can fail on their own merits but it's like ZombiU, the game had issues but it was an amazing survival horror game, most reviews complained because it didn't play like a shooter. Well no shit....
Mmhm.I guess it’s getting almost 90, maybe 89.