• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Race Your PC Thread2 of Voiding Warranties

S

scogoth

Member
Shameless bump of this awesome thread.


Anyway so close to 4.5GHz on my i7-930. I've decided to get a new mobo+CPU so I thought why not see how far I can push my current setup. Right now at settings are

vcore - 1.5V
BLCK - 212Mhz
Multi - 21x
QPI - 1.5
IOH - 1.3v
ICH - 1.3v
CPU/IOH clock skew - 300ps
Spread spectrum - 1000mV

And can't quite get it running stable.. I may just go crazy and bump all voltage up by like .1 and setup clock skews to 1000ps and hope to get 4.6 or 4.7
 
M

mkenyon

Banned
Take care, you are entering unsafe territory.

BTW, I did some researching, and it seems the EVGA X79 boards are all really bad. Like, worse than the Gigabyte ones :p

I think we need to leave P scores behind. I think I'd like to redo this thread with X scores as well as max settings Heaven runs. 720p performance just really doesn't mean much anymore.
 
S

scogoth

Member
mkenyon said:
Take care, you are entering unsafe territory.

BTW, I did some researching, and it seems the EVGA X79 boards are all really bad. Like, worse than the Gigabyte ones :p

I think we need to leave P scores behind. I think I'd like to redo this thread with X scores as well as max settings Heaven runs. 720p performance just really doesn't mean much anymore.
Click to expand...

Ugh I knew there had to be reason they were 50% off.

EDIT: order the full block for the M5E. The 3770K will do me just fine
 
Irobot82

Irobot82

Member
Got some proof now.

http://valid.canardpc.com/2640372

and

dfb.png


Core i5 3570k @ 4.2

AMD 7950 GPU @ 1100 RAM @ 1425

I tried running 3D Mark but it crashes on one of the last tests....
 
K

kharma45

Member
P6420 - 2GB MSI Twin Frozr 3 7850 - 1150/1450/1.185v - i5 750 @ 3.8GHz - 4 RAM @ 1333MHz (some sort of basic Samsung stuff) - ASRock P55M Pro - kharma45 - Noctua NH-U12P SE2 - link to score
 
K

kharma45

Member
Ran the bench again with the new 13.1 drivers and a higher clock on my GPU, got a good jump up!

P7345 - 2GB MSI Twin Frozr 3 7850 - 1200/1500/2.1v - i5 750 @ 3.8GHz - 4 RAM @ 1333MHz (some sort of basic Samsung stuff) - ASRock P55M Pro - kharma45 - Noctua NH-U12P SE2 - link to score
 
M

mkenyon

Banned
So not to throw everyone off, but I think I'd like to completely change the data in the OP.

I think the P scores are nearing obsolescence. What I'd like to do is redo the OP with X scores or Heaven maxed scores. Let me know what you guys think.
 
S

scogoth

Member
mkenyon said:
So not to throw everyone off, but I think I'd like to completely change the data in the OP.

I think the P scores are nearing obsolescence. What I'd like to do is redo the OP with X scores or Heaven maxed scores. Let me know what you guys think.
Click to expand...

Completely agree and it would be a nice house cleaning opportunity. I still haven't got 3Dmark to work on windows 8 so my vote is heaven. It runs but crashes after the bench and doesn't upload results.
 
B

Burgess_101

Member
P11046- 2x Sapphire HD 7870 2GB - 1050/1250/stock - i7 2700k @ 3.8GHz - Crucial Ballistix Tracer RAM 8GB 1600MHz - GIGABYTE Z68XP UD4 - Burgess_101 - Custom watercooling loop - Link to score

Haven't bothered pushing it all yet, will overclock tomorrow or if there is a switch to Heaven.
 
K

kharma45

Member
mkenyon said:
So not to throw everyone off, but I think I'd like to completely change the data in the OP.

I think the P scores are nearing obsolescence. What I'd like to do is redo the OP with X scores or Heaven maxed scores. Let me know what you guys think.
Click to expand...

scogoth said:
Completely agree and it would be a nice house cleaning opportunity. I still haven't got 3Dmark to work on windows 8 so my vote is heaven. It runs but crashes after the bench and doesn't upload results.
Click to expand...

Heaven 3.0 is probably the best bet then.
 
K

kennah

Member
mkenyon said:
So not to throw everyone off, but I think I'd like to completely change the data in the OP.

I think the P scores are nearing obsolescence. What I'd like to do is redo the OP with X scores or Heaven maxed scores. Let me know what you guys think.
Click to expand...
Let's do it
 
L

LCGeek

formerly sane
mkenyon said:
So not to throw everyone off, but I think I'd like to completely change the data in the OP.

I think the P scores are nearing obsolescence. What I'd like to do is redo the OP with X scores or Heaven maxed scores. Let me know what you guys think.
Click to expand...

Despite not having the kind of machines the tops in here do for benching, most places I go to for overclocking use heaven for maxing out ocs and testing gpus. The scores would be more accurate and in some cases would sort out things since heaven will stress newer cards better.
 
D

Dreams-Visions

Member
P8234 - 2GB GTX 670 Windforce + 112% +40 + 370 - i7-920 Stock - 12GB @ 1600 - Intel G2 SSD

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/5416856


P7498 - 2GB GTX 660ti EVGA Superclocked stock - i7-920 Stock - 12GB @ 1600 - Intel G2 SSD

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/5752876

Same system. Just comparing 2 video cards. Rather impressed by how well the 660ti keeps up with the 670, considering the price difference. 670 doesn't seem to be worth the price of admission on my rig. Might return it. I haven't even overclocked the 660ti yet and its only ~700 off the best speeds I could get off the Windforce on my system. In actual games, the only difference I see is dropping the AA from 8x to 4x or 4x to 2x (depending on the game), while leaving everything else the same to get matching or better framerates.
 
H

Hazaro

relies on auto-aim
Dreams-Visions said:
P8234 - 2GB GTX 670 Windforce + 112% +40 + 370 - i7-920 Stock - 12GB @ 1600 - Intel G2 SSD

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/5416856


P7498 - 2GB GTX 660ti EVGA Superclocked stock - i7-920 Stock - 12GB @ 1600 - Intel G2 SSD

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/5752876

Same system. Just comparing 2 video cards. Rather impressed by how well the 660ti keeps up with the 670, considering the price difference. 670 doesn't seem to be worth the price of admission on my rig. Might return it. I haven't even overclocked the 660ti yet and its only ~700 off the best speeds I could get off the Windforce on my system. In actual games, the only difference I see is dropping the AA from 8x to 4x, while leaving everything else the same to get matching or better framerates.
Click to expand...
Hazaro said:
Doing some benches while waiting for D3 to fix itself.

P8578 - GTX670 (980/3005/1.150V) - 2500K @ 4.2Ghz - 8GB GSkill DDR3 @ 1333 - ASUS P8P67 PRO - Hazaro - Air - Link
P8868 - GTX670 (+72(1215 Boost)/3005/1.175V) - 2500K @ 4.2Ghz - 8GB GSkill DDR3 @ 1333 - ASUS P8P67 PRO - Hazaro - Air - Link
P9175 - GTX670 (+149(1286 Boost)/3005/1.180V) - 2500K @ 4.2Ghz - 8GB GSkill DDR3 @ 1333 - ASUS P8P67 PRO - Hazaro - Air - Link
Click to expand...
P9972 - GTX670 (+149(1286 Boost)/3005/1.180V) - 2600K @ 4.3Ghz - 8GB Samsung DDR3 @ 1600 - ASUS Gene V - Hazaro - Air - Link
P10049 - GTX670 (+149(1286 Boost)/3151/1.180V) - 2600K @ 4.3Ghz - 8GB Samsung DDR3 @ 1600 - ASUS Gene V - Hazaro - Air - Link
P10099 - GTX670 (+149(1286 Boost)/3151/1.180V) - 2600K @ 4.3Ghz - 8GB Samsung DDR3 @ 2133 - ASUS Gene V - Hazaro - Air - Link
P10310 - GTX670 (+149(1286 Boost)/3465/1.180V) - 2600K @ 4.3Ghz - 8GB Samsung DDR3 @ 2133 - ASUS Gene V - Hazaro - Air - Link
P10381 - GTX670 (+149(1286 Boost)/3780/1.180V) - 2600K @ 4.3Ghz - 8GB Samsung DDR3 @ 2133 - ASUS Gene V - Hazaro - Air - Link
P10449 - GTX670 (+165(1302 Boost)/3780/1.180V) - 2600K @ 4.3Ghz - 8GB Samsung DDR3 @ 2133 - ASUS Gene V - Hazaro - Air - Link
P10489 - GTX670 (+171(1308 Boost)/3848/1.180V) - 2600K @ 4.3Ghz - 8GB Samsung DDR3 @ 2133 - ASUS Gene V - Hazaro - Air - Link
P10526 - GTX670 (+171(1308 Boost)/3899/1.180V) - 2600K @ 4.3Ghz - 8GB Samsung DDR3 @ 2133 - ASUS Gene V - Hazaro - Air - Link
P10555 - GTX670 (+171(1308 Boost)/3949/1.180V) - 2600K @ 4.3Ghz - 8GB Samsung DDR3 @ 2133 - ASUS Gene V - Hazaro - Air - Link
P10643 - GTX670 (+171(1308 Boost)/3899/1.180V) - 2600K @ 4.3Ghz - 8GB Samsung DDR3 @ 2133 - ASUS Gene V - Hazaro - Air - Link (59.9FPS oddity fixed)
Click to expand...
I have a 670 Windforce. Just give it MORE POWER.
Also those benches are just dumb marks where when you add more CPU and HT the numbers go up. Check some of the FPS comparisons. The difference between a slightly OC'd 670 and my 10.6k score is just like 5% in real FPS.

Same thing to see the 660Ti be within like 10% of the 670. Solid card and the 670 unless it's like $330 isn't worth the price of admission with 7950 price cuts.
 
D

Dreams-Visions

Member
Hazaro said:
I have a 670 Windforce. Just give it MORE POWER.
Also those benches are just dumb marks where when you add more CPU and HT the numbers go up. Check some of the FPS comparisons. The difference between a slightly OC'd 670 and my 10.6k score is just like 5% in real FPS.

Same thing to see the 660Ti be within like 10% of the 670. Solid card and the 670 unless it's like $330 isn't worth the price of admission with 7950 price cuts.
Click to expand...

*takes notes*

I shall give it MOAR POWWAH.
 
joeygreco1985

joeygreco1985

Member
scogoth said:
Shameless bump of this awesome thread.


Anyway so close to 4.5GHz on my i7-930. I've decided to get a new mobo+CPU so I thought why not see how far I can push my current setup. Right now at settings are

vcore - 1.5V
BLCK - 212Mhz
Multi - 21x
QPI - 1.5
IOH - 1.3v
ICH - 1.3v
CPU/IOH clock skew - 300ps
Spread spectrum - 1000mV

And can't quite get it running stable.. I may just go crazy and bump all voltage up by like .1 and setup clock skews to 1000ps and hope to get 4.6 or 4.7
Click to expand...


Hmmmmm interesting. I've had my i7 940 clocked at 3.6 ghz for a while now, should I push it closer to 4?
 
M

mkenyon

Banned
Hazaro said:
I have a 670 Windforce. Just give it MORE POWER.
Also those benches are just dumb marks where when you add more CPU and HT the numbers go up. Check some of the FPS comparisons. The difference between a slightly OC'd 670 and my 10.6k score is just like 5% in real FPS.
Click to expand...
Need a new tag, "Likes to take fun out into the forest and kill it."
scogoth said:
fap material
Click to expand...
*fap fap fap*
 
B

beast786

Member
Will subscribe , great job OP.

I have been dropped to #11 spot overall. this cannot be tolerated ;p. Actually am working to be getting a completely new rig by year end. eah I know that's a long time, but waiting for next gen Nividia cards and hopefully oculus rift
 
M

mkenyon

Banned
3DMark2013 is out. Shitjustgotreal/disgunbegood/othermemes.jpeg

I'll update the thread this week.

Actually, should I update or just go for new thread?
 
M

mkenyon

Banned
Sethos said:
untitled-1bfkfp.gif
Click to expand...
I'm using that. :p

*edit*

What I'm thinking about doing is doing some gdocs spread sheets. These spread sheets would be able to be altered by a group of people. If you're interested in having access to that to help update the spreadsheet as we get new submissions, PM me.
 
S

scogoth

Member
mkenyon said:
For the 3DMark ladder, should we have it for extreme preset or standard?
Click to expand...

I tried extreme, its really extreme. I think standard to keep the mid tier and single GPU setups in the hunt.

Also its alive! But still so much work to do for cable management and such. And I can't fit my HDD in there anymore..... so going to have to migrate to dual SSD setup
9m2NM94.jpg
Click to expand...
 
Irobot82

Irobot82

Member
scogoth said:
Windows 8?
Click to expand...

Yeap, but it works now


P9443 - HD7950 - 1125/1500/stock - 3570K @ 4.4GHz - 8GB Geil EVO Veloce @ 1600MHz - ASrock Z77 Extreme4 - Irobot82 - Thermaltake 2.0 Performer - link

edit:
Apparently I didn't have the correct setting. After correcting them and re-running the tests, my score went WAY UP!. So that puts me in first place for single AMD Card no?

Edit 2:
With Virtu MVP enabled

P11954

Wow. Does this program really boost FPS performances?
 
M

mkenyon

Banned
With the ITX boards that are out, that would be quite unfair.

I'm actually leaning towards not having as many categories in general. I think splitting multi and single GPU ladders is good, and then there will be one for Heaven, one for 3DMark. Other than that, it is just too much of a PITA to manage and update.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Nvidia’s Chat with RTX is a promising AI chatbot that runs locally on your PC
13
1K
Chiggs replied
Should I buy a gaming PC?
2
67
3K
David B replied
Reducing the CPU bound game lows on 2.9GHz/4.3GHz boost Core i5-10400
Analysis Hardware
13
2K
PaintTinJr replied
Google Play Games for PC has launched in the US and 7 other countries. Play Android games on your PC TODAY (Req: Win 10 or 11, 10GB SSD, 8GB of RAM)
2
95
5K
Puscifer replied
retro consoles and 240p / 480p resolution - sometimes less is more
2
79
6K
sigmaZ replied
Top Bottom