• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Take-Two is ‘discussing’ more movie adaptations but being ‘very selective’

IbizaPocholo

NeoGAFs Kent Brockman

Take-Two CEO Strauss Zelnick said the company is taking a “very, very selective, and very careful” approach to adapting its properties for film or TV.

Borderlands and BioShock movies are currently in the works, and while Zelnick said Take-Two is “discussing” further adaptations, the company is wary of the damage a misfire could to its brands.

“If we were willing to use the company’s balance sheet to make a movie or a television show, then in the event of great success we would benefit from it,” he said. “But we’re not prepared to use the company’s balance sheet that way because the risk/reward profile is unappealing to us.

“They’re very difficult businesses,” continued Zelnick, who previously spent four years as president and chief operating officer of 20th Century Fox, and also served as vice president of international television for Columbia Pictures. “I’ve been in them successfully, they’re super challenging, they’re not what we do. We much prefer the risk/reward profile of the business that we’re in.

“So that means that the only way we can be in that business is through a license arrangement with a third party. And let’s put it in context. Mattel said that their expected profits from licensing the Barbie IP for a movie would be about $125 million. Now, Barbie is a massive, massive hit, it’s an extraordinary hit, so you don’t want to posit a massive hit and look at the numbers that way.

“Even in a really good news scenario, the license fees would be a fraction thereof for many of our properties, not really enough to be meaningful here. And we have to weigh that too against the risk of failure. And the hit ratios in the motion picture business are vastly lower than they are in the interactive entertainment business.

“Our hit ratios for console properties here are in the 80s or 90 percent. The hit ratio for a well-run movie studio is around 30%, which is to say there’s a 70% chance that the movie that we license could fail.

“And so, in success, the number in terms of the benefit to our bottom line is, it’s not de minimis, it’s not zero, but it’s not really material to what we do around here. And in failure, we run the risk of compromising the underlying intellectual property, so it’s a high bar.”

“We have licensed two properties, we’ve licensed Borderlands to Lionsgate, there’s a picture coming, we’ve licensed BioShock, we’re looking forward to that as well,” Zelnick said on Wednesday. “And we have other titles in discussions, not anything ready to announce. But we’re going to be very, very selective, and very careful.”
 
Man, I'd love to see David Fincher or Tarantino, direct a Max Payne movie.

GTA, is kinda tricky, because, the whole theme of the games is parodying popular culture, and American gangster lifestyle. It can be done, but should be careful to not form a full circle and go back to be inspired by scenes from movies like Scarface or Godfather, where the games take heavy inspiration from.
 

StereoVsn

Member
Red Dead series as a proper movie duology or trilogy would be pretty cool. It won’t happen since there probably isn’t much money in Westerns, but overall that seems fairly straightforward proposition otherwise.
 
Top Bottom