Gamerguy84
Member
IMO I think their is way more potential customers for this. Even the enthusiasts customers here. If the price is right.
Is there a budget PS5 option or do non-elites need not apply?
Yes, in both cases but both cases are still different if my price predictions hold true. IF. $200 more for an Xbox with a disc drive vs $100 more for a PS5 with a disc drive. That was my point. It's not the same hit. $200 hits your wallet different than $100 does lolWell, while we're dumbing it down.
The original issue was people with large disc libraries they they want to keep using. Those people cannot purchase the PS5 digital or Series S.
Those customers will need to 'pay significantly more just to get all the bells and whistles and a disc drive' in both cases.
Its seriously just a gamepass game console. It's what they want people to buy just to get on to Gamepass as a cheap next gen entry point. That's all it is. The Series X is for the serious gamer who will buy lots of multiplats and want best performance. There are probably so many casuals who probably fit the Series S criteria. Especially still being powerful enough to easily output everything at 1440p/60. If it's cheap enough it will be much more desirable then series X, its more powerful than One X and its going to be cheaper than the One X was, that's why they discontinued the One X, it doesn't fit in their business model.
It is interesting as it will have a RAM deficiency against the One X, likely only 8 GB of RAM available to games and if you see a game pushing very strongly for RT and other expensive techniques bringing to native 1440p on XSX, should we expect sub 1080p native on XSS or less?
Also, it apparently is not just CU count being reduced, but clockspeed too (we do not know if they go with 3 DCU per Shader Array and this still keep the same amount of ROP’s and Geometry Engine resources as XSX).
Reducing the clockspeed does lower fill rate, triangle processing, and the performance of other fixed components that are outside of the CU’s: before CU’s can transform and shade those vertices and fragments you need the geometry to go through a processing phase (clip, setup, rasterise, etc...) that has a lower ceiling limit on XSS. Essentially: if you try to maximise the geometry throughput (think UE5’s micro polygons based engine) of XSX you will have a resolution independent problem on XSS (meaning that lowering resolution does not help you much, you need to focus more on rejecting tiny triangles with little screen coverage).
Damn it now PS5 multiplats will be downgraded. Sony better buy a lot more 3rd party exclusive deals. In going desperation mode with their wonky plans to secure price and power MS has really given the finger to developers who have to deal with this limiter of a product.
I don't remember when i bought a physical copy last timeLack of disc drive is a deal breaker.
Lol. Why would XSS cost only 50$ less as PS5DE?Xbox Series X and Playstation 5 disc versions-$600
Xbox Series S($400) and PS5 digital version-$450
Ray tracing will not be on XSS.
XSS is your cheap entry to next gen console hardware. You play at 1440p60 fps max at high medium graphics settings.
Series X- Ultra 4k 60/30 with or without ray tracing.
I understand your point however I like to sell games after being done with them to recoup the costs so I prefer discs on consoles.I don't remember when i bought a physical copy last time
why are people thinking that removing a $10 disk drive makes the price drop $100?
So the Series X was held back in ram department to have a 10 gb block of similar ram to the Series S. I guess this will make scaling easier? but another example of being held back. Starting to think The X only exists for Microsoft to claim the most powerful, but they really want the S to be in every household.
Has to be dirt cheap to even be worthwhile. Even then I imagine a lot of casuals will just stick with their Xbox One /PS4 consoles for the time being.
It's highly unlikely that they would sell a digital version at a profit. They will use the digital one to increase market share and get people on the platform that have less to spend on a console. They don't want to price it too close to the disc version either, because then everyone would skip the digital one.why are people thinking that removing a $10 disk drive makes the price drop $100?
why are people thinking that removing a $10 disk drive makes the price drop $100?
Sorry, was more an opinion statement then actually thinking you don't know.I know what it's for, but I'm not so sure it's going to work out for them, same for the ps5
Question for you guys. Would a discless Series X be too many skus? So you have an all digital X and S and a disc based X. The all digital Series X would compete with the all digital PS5 price wise with the Series S coming in even lower.
One S $199
Series S $299
Series X DE $399
Series X with disc $499
Question for you guys. Would a discless Series X be too many skus? So you have an all digital X and S and a disc based X. The all digital Series X would compete with the all digital PS5 price wise with the Series S coming in even lower.
One S $199
Series S $299
Series X DE $399
Series X with disc $499
PS4 has consistently sold more software digitally for compared to physical the past year. Sony releasing an all digital PS5 is a reaction to that to ensure better profit/more money in their pockets.Sorry, was more an opinion statement then actually thinking you don't know.
I think it works better than the all digital PS5 because Gamepass being an all digital service is what's keeping Xbox afloat. It's more forgivable.
If the PS5 had their own version of Gamepass and Exclusives were part of the subscription then the all digital PS5 if cheap enough would sell like hot cakes. PS now is not the same thing, its not even available in a lot of countries, we surprisingly don't even have it here in Australia. Gamepass is pretty much worldwide. Not sure where you are but Australia is usually one of the first to get everything so I don't know why we don't have PS Now.
Not an Xbox Fanboy by the way, I have One X and Pro but going PS5 only next gen. I don't care for Xbox at all.
They most likely won't do a discless Series X. The fact that they're hiding the Series S this long, leads me to believe this is all we're getting from that lineup.
I don't think that's the case at all. I think we will absolutely get a discless Series X. The only question is when. I think they will price match the Series X with the regular PS5 (otherwise why wait for the price) and could possibly do a discless sku sometime down the line if the all digital PS5 proves popular at it's pricepoint.
Then you have the Series S which will be the best bang for your buck 1080p console which is future proof for next-gen games.
There's also a rumored new One S v2 sku going around. My guess is it will come out bundled with the new controller. It will also include some of the hardware latency improvements that are coming to the Series S/X platforms. Thus making it a great and super cheap Game Pass streaming box.
Lol. Why would XSS cost only 50$ less as PS5DE?
Both don't have disc drives, but XSS has: 16 CU fewer, 6GB less GDDR6 RAM, cheaper SSD solution, probably cheaper built costs thanks to lower cooling requirements.
So why in hell would Microsoft priced it same as PS5 DE?
The bolded is the thing I just refuse to believe. I've seen Gaffers say this a lot lately, but I think it ignores that their needs to be demand for something before consumers decide to buy it. Millions of people worldwide aren't going to buy the XSS "just" because it's the new thing on shelves. MS will have to give those people a reason to demand or want an XSS. And if the choice is a $299 disc-less XSS and a $399 disc-less PS5, I'm not sure the majority will go with the XSS.
If this is true, it's gonna be painful:
Why are people saying 1440P at 60fps. May be Halo infinite or racing games but I think and hope this crappy console is 1080P console. Otherwise gfx on Xbox is not going that impressive if Microsoft are going after pixels count, fps count and RT. This is a horrible idea.
Here we go again.PS4 has consistently sold more software digitally for compared to physical the past year. Sony releasing an all digital PS5 is a reaction to that to ensure better profit/more money in their pockets.
![]()
PS4 Digital Games Lead Massive Sales Increase In 2020
Digital sales on PlayStation 4 have skyrocketed.www.google.com
So it makes complete sense as to why we're getting an all digital PS5.
In your scenario Series S is the best way to enter next-gen on a budget, it's a genuine alternative. In my opinion your guess about the price difference between PS5 digital and PS5 isn't big enough to make it worth the loss of functionality.Yes, in both cases but both cases are still different if my price predictions hold true. IF. $200 more for an Xbox with a disc drive vs $100 more for a PS5 with a disc drive. That was my point. It's not the same hit. $200 hits your wallet different than $100 does lol
And I agree with the former part of your paragraph. Series S will sell a lot because of it's alluded price and that's a good thing. As far as the price difference between the digital PS5 and the disc drive version, I think $100 is enough to sway people while $50 wouldn't make sense to have a separate SKU.In your scenario Series S is the best way to enter next-gen on a budget, it's a genuine alternative. In my opinion your guess about the price difference between PS5 digital and PS5 isn't big enough to make it worth the loss of functionality.
The cheaper the Series S is the better it will be for everyone I guess. I think Sony will try and position their Digital version in between the full PS5 and the Series S. Well, at least as far as common sense will allow.And I agree with the former part of your paragraph. Series S will sell a lot because of it's alluded price and that's a good thing. As far as the price difference between the digital PS5 and the disc drive version, I think $100 is enough to sway people while $50 wouldn't make sense to have a separate SKU.
But we'll see soon enough what these consoles will ultimately be priced at. Hopefully we won't have to wait enough to find out at the register![]()
In your scenario Series S is the best way to enter next-gen on a budget, it's a genuine alternative. In my opinion your guess about the price difference between PS5 digital and PS5 isn't big enough to make it worth the loss of functionality.
How does removing a disk save a hundred dollars? Maybe 50 at best, but 100?
I think people who buy digital only ps5 were already digital only on ps4, so no extra revenue there. Besides why would sony do loss leader, first 10 million will be sold out regardless if its 400 or 500.Once again - it isn't just about the amount they save by not including the drive.
It is also about the extra revenue they will gain by forcing people to buy all their games through their own online store (where they get more profit than they do from physical media).
Yes, the drive itself may only cost $20-40. But $10 extra profit on each game someone buys easily adds up to make up the $100 difference.
Remember, the Xbox 360 models were $100 apart at launch and the only differences were a 20GB HDD and the component cables - certainly not a $100 difference in cost to MS.
The cheaper the Series S is the better it will be for everyone I guess. I think Sony will try and position their Digital version in between the full PS5 and the Series S. Well, at least as far as common sense will allow.
At the register? We'll have to sign an NDA and there'll be a withdrawal from your credit card with the amount redacted.![]()
I revised my thoughts now
Series S $299
PS5DE $499
PS5 $599
Series X $599
You don't make 10 million consoles for the first ~6 months to sell them at $599.
There is a $499 there you know....
besides, it is not about to sell them at $599, but if the components are priced high, they are high![]()
I think of MS was set on the price of $299 they would have revealed it. I think they're flexible with the pricing depending on what Sony does. If Sony really went down to 399 I could see Microsoft going to 250 or 200. If Sony can afford to be $399 Microsoft can afford to be $199 with cheaper hardware, but they're probably just stop at $250.
If this is true, it's gonna be painful:
Has this guy ever been right about something he tweeted?
Ps4 sold worldwide over 110m million units, surely there is at least 10 million hardcore sony console fans worldwide without monetary issues. But bom has already been speculated to be slightly under 500 so no console is unlikely to be 600.Do you guys think Sony is INSANE and CRAZY? No way they can sell 10 million PS5s if it cost $599. All of the PS execs would have to be on crack if they think they'll be able to 10 million units at that cost.
I don't think MS can "afford" to sell Lockhart a dollar below $299. It's just not feasible or realistic to do so. At some point, the cost of the SSD, controller, and APU alone would prohibit that price point.