You said nobody mentioned launch then subsequently used the phrase "from the start" to refer to launch anyway.
Are you really going to pull this?
https://www.neogaf.com/threads/was-...-for-xbox-in-hindsight.1641938/post-267523753
As I said in this post, you were clearly trying to take an old post out of context. What actually happened is I said I never used the word "launch" in the post you quoted back then, and as I linked, I was right as it wasn't in either quote you made in that post.
Your post on this page quotes me saying "I didn't say launch anywhere in what you quoted" which was referring to you bringing it up without the word being in the quotes you made early in the discussion. What's funny is when I said I didn't say launch in those quotes, you replied "No but" after that admitting that yes, I was right and didn't use that word. Now you're pretending I talked about launch in a recent post, and trying to start a whole new argument, not happening.
when do you think "over the generation" starts kicking in?
Because it's irrelevant, it's a goal post moving question that has nothing to do with anything other than you trying to escape accountability for misreading Phils quote and my original response, making your 2.2 year post completely pointless. I don't know why you keep digging your hole deeper when the post chain is clear as day,
I don't think it was a mistake especially considering sales figures to date, however I am still shocked that they didn't partner with a company like meta to at least support it.
I mean how hard would it really have been to have Series X support the quest 2 and allow developers to make vr games?
Considering they are pushing Series S, very difficult.
Low X stock =/= pushing S, but you know this of course.
Not to mention S wasn't expected to be leading in sales according to MS themselves, so the stock issue must have really messed things up.
The context again, and this is the last time since I've already said this quoting this same chain you intentionally skipped over, believing you may have forgot, but now it's clear you're being intentionally deceptive, that the conversation was about Xbox
NOT launching One X or Series VR, or partnering with VR.
You responded to someone posting IN THAT context, that such a partnership would be difficult because they are pushing the X, as you have explained, as the main console.
I told you, correctly, that Low X stock was the reason why the S is pushed around more, even after that discussing MS talking about not meeting demand and producing enough for the holiday quarter, which btw demolishes your theory about them intentionally not producing stock because then making that statement would be a PR issue. The Low X sales is why they pushed the S hard, including the discounts during the holiday quarter (which you have omitted from your speculation that the X is losing more money than the S)
Then I brought up the fact that the S was not expected to be leading sales according to MS, and that the lack of production must have really messed things up for them since the S is still leading. This is
incredibly obvious from this chain of posts, as well as the follow-ups before you tried shifting posts.
The X stock issue has been from the start, yes, it clearly has messed up MS expectations based on their own words. The fact the X production still isn't resolved is a problem, and shows that their expectations was tattered. Everything else is you playing word games by removing lines out of context. There's no 2.2 years or anything involved here, that's just you trying to save face because you didn't read the quote accurately.
This has now been explained to you twice, and the chain above is not edited and is clearly not deniable in terms of its context. So that will end your circles now have a nice day.