• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NPD Sales Results for March 2014 [Up4: FFX/X-2 HD]

Xbox One held four top titles in the generation eight top 10 console game title list in the U.S. including: “Plans vs. Zombies: Garden Warfare,” “Call of Duty: Ghosts,” “Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes,” “ Titanfall.”

He is wrong. The Xbone held five spots, same as PS4. Just sayin...
 

wapplew

Member
I suppose but PS3 software sales will only continue to decline as new buyers move onto the newer platform

Personally I somewhat expect a new PS3 sku based on the smaller Cell die at E3 this year, hopefully reasonably priced

They should release a disk-less ultra slim PS3 with 3-6 month PS+, just for those used to play pirated console country.
 

John Harker

Definitely doesn't make things up as he goes along.
but if everyone's on one platform you'll get third-parties competing against each other and that's where innovation will come from...!

Yup. Just wait. Once Mario and Uncharted and Gears and God of War and Forza and Gran Turismo are all on the same system and everyone has only that system they will all sell soooo much more and developers will be so excited that their dedicated fan bases now have so many more options to compete for their attention, they'll be sure to take these exciting brands into crazy directions to stand out from the pack! Man that M 18-34 must be saving sooooo much money by only owning one console that he's sure to purchase THREE TIMES the number of games he used to so pubs can see at least the same revenue. Who needs segments anyway?! Let's all advertise to the same people, save money their too!
 
4Bzs4aH.jpg


Had to. Gotta spin like Microsoft does.
 
that's a decent number for metal gear, I expected much lower due to the 1 hour reports and articles

I'll probably buy it when its $10-15 on ps4 or xbox one
 

Guymelef

Member
Another month with cross gen tittles (this month for example Ground Zeroes XBO > PS3)

And i remember this from Gearbox CEO...
During the reveal event for the Pre-Sequel, he explained that "there are fewer Xbox Ones and PlayStation 4s than we sold copies of Borderlands 2. I imagine over time--you know, maybe by the time we get to third or fourth Christmas--there will be enough of an install base."
 
That's why there's little point in trying to drive PS3 installed base anymore; it's an exercise in futility.

It does pose a quandary. Assuming for a minute that Sony anticipated a far more gradual collapse of last gen software as the rest of the industry seemed to, then a cheaper PS3 SKU released at E3 this year might make sense of the R&D cost for it

But with how fast the decline is in last gen software, would Sony still choose to release the new SKU as the R&D is already paid for?
 
lol at Wii U > PS3. Sony really needs to pricecut that thing if they want anything resembling sales

Also do people think that XB1 has been selling more or less of its WW sales in US relative to what the percentage was in November and December? Because if US sales of XB1 are still about 60% of WW LTD for it, that's fairly interesting. If it's greater than 60% well it starts to get pretty worrisome

I'm pretty sure it has to be higher. Outside of the UK, it's dead pretty much everywhere else. But yea, either way it could be that that I'd the reason for going with shipped instead of sold through, since they may not even be at 4 million
 

kadotsu

Banned
That's why there's little point in trying to drive PS3 installed base anymore; it's an exercise in futility.

Sony is still driving the installed base where it matters. In Europe they have been very aggressive in pushing the PS3 with FIFA World Cup (7th gen exclusive). You could get a PS3 with 2 controllers and the game for €189. It'll probably be the last push, though.

The obvious thing would be a $/€150 system as a Roku competitor instead of a futile attempt to make the VITA TV happen.
 
It does pose a quandary. Assuming for a minute that Sony anticipated a far more gradual collapse of last gen software as the rest of the industry seemed to, then a cheaper PS3 SKU released at E3 this year might make sense of the R&D cost for it

But with how fast the decline is in last gen software, would Sony still choose to release the new SKU as the R&D is already paid for?


I think the overly long generation has left less demand for the previous generation platform. Sony seems unable or unwilling to drive PS3 lower, so they may be happy just letting the platform slowly die off.
 

RE_Player

Member
Destiny and Watch_Dogs are going to sell like shit on previous consoles, PS3 and 360. I expect an ok first week and complete drop off after. This whole cross gen thing needs to die.
 

John Harker

Definitely doesn't make things up as he goes along.
PS2 says no

Short. Sighted. Ps2 success gave you a shitty expensive ps3 launch no one wanted. Xbox 360 success gives you an xbone living room drm entertainment hub people are laughing at. Wii runaway success gives you a Wii u no one will touchPad due to old tech.

The underdogs take the next cycle because they are depserste to take risk and innovative, or they know they'd lose. Market leaders play it safe and stick to their long term vision. You need competition to foster change and disrupt that vision.

Can you imagine if there was only one box now, that drove out the other two and no new players releasing another the next cycle? You'd be in a terrible position. Trust the experts.
 

Guymelef

Member
Destiny and Watch_Dogs are going to sell like shit on previous consoles, PS3 and 360. I expect an ok first week and complete drop off after. This whole cross gen thing needs to die.

Persona 5 on PS4 = Good
The Phantom Pain on PS3 = Kojima should save resources.
 

farmerboy

Member
Remember when the 360 won every single NPD and we'd get Aaron Greenberg ranting on about how great they were, as if those figures were worldwide. REMEMBER?

Where are you now Aaron? WHERE ARE YOU NOWWWW?
 

Jea Song

Did the right thing
At this point it seems xb1 will be behind ps4 this entire gen. Ps4 will always get the better multiplats cause it will always have the technical advantage.

When Microsoft does a price drop Sony will do one. As long as Microsoft keeps believing in kinect, the ps4 will always be cheaper.

Even with a kinect less SKU at the same price as a ps4, the general knowledge will be the ps4 is the more powerful console and runs games better.

Microsoft has yet to show a single kinect feature that is worthy of that extra 100 premium they put on it. Not even Titanfall, a game which Microsoft hyped for Xbox one basically ignoring the 360 and Pc version, even uses kinect.

Microsoft seriously needs to blow this E3 out of the water.

At this point I cannot see them showing something so unbelievably amazing that puts to shame what Sony shows. I don't see either of them blowing each other out of the water at e3.

So say they both have an amazing show at e3, it's still bad news for Microsoft. They need to pull something so great that it becomes a must own console in order to even catch up with Sony IMO.
 

Philippo

Member
Short. Sighted. Ps2 success gave you a shitty expensive ps3 launch no one wanted. Xbox 360 success gives you an xbone living room drm entertainment hub people are laughing at. Wii runaway success gives you a Wii u no one will touchPad due to old tech.

The underdogs take the next cycle because they are depserste to take risk and innovative, or they know they'd lose. Market leaders play it safe and stick to their long term vision. You need competition to foster change and disrupt that vision.

Can you imagine if there was only one box now, that drove out the other two and no new players releasing another the next cycle? You'd be in a terrible position. Trust the experts.

Yes but Sony already had that cycle.
If they have PS4 dominion, i highly doubt they'd repeat the PS3 fiasco.
I mean, they know what the outcome'll be.
If anything, i expect the PS5 to simply be a beefier PS4 with better hardware and integrated VR, but i cannot see Sony going the arrogant route again.
 

Salex_

Member
Short. Sighted. Ps2 success gave you a shitty expensive ps3 launch no one wanted. Xbox 360 success gives you an xbone living room drm entertainment hub people are laughing at. Wii runaway success gives you a Wii u no one will touchPad due to old tech.

The underdogs take the next cycle because they are depserste to take risk and innovative, or they know they'd lose. Market leaders play it safe and stick to their long term vision. You need competition to foster change and disrupt that vision.

Can you imagine if there was only one box now, that drove out the other two and no new players releasing another the next cycle? You'd be in a terrible position. Trust the experts.

Your entire flawed post (the PS3 was NOT "playing it safe" look at the last post I made on the previous page.) goes out of the window when you look at the PS1>PS2.
 

I-hate-u

Member
Another month with cross gen tittles (this month for example Ground Zeroes XBO > PS3)

And i remember this from Gearbox CEO...

Yup, publishers need to re-evaluate their strategies regarding current gen consoles. People are dropping them unexpectedly fast.
 

Dragon

Banned
Short. Sighted. Ps2 success gave you a shitty expensive ps3 launch no one wanted. Xbox 360 success gives you an xbone living room drm entertainment hub people are laughing at. Wii runaway success gives you a Wii u no one will touchPad due to old tech.

The underdogs take the next cycle because they are depserste to take risk and innovative, or they know they'd lose. Market leaders play it safe and stick to their long term vision. You need competition to foster change and disrupt that vision.

Can you imagine if there was only one box now, that drove out the other two and no new players releasing another the next cycle? You'd be in a terrible position. Trust the experts.

You're talking about successors. If you approach it from the games angle, both PS2 and 360 gens were great for games. You're kind of skewing what was being talked about before, which was the fallacious argument that 'competition', which I assume in this case means the XB1 selling comparably to the PS4, is the only way we can get good games. Do you honestly believe that to be the case?

I really really don't.
 

Heshinsi

"playing" dumb? unpossible
Short. Sighted. Ps2 success gave you a shitty expensive ps3 launch no one wanted. Xbox 360 success gives you an xbone living room drm entertainment hub people are laughing at. Wii runaway success gives you a Wii u no one will touchPad due to old tech.

The underdogs take the next cycle because they are depserste to take risk and innovative, or they know they'd lose. Market leaders play it safe and stick to their long term vision. You need competition to foster change and disrupt that vision.

Can you imagine if there was only one box now, that drove out the other two and no new players releasing another the next cycle? You'd be in a terrible position. Trust the experts.

Ok, what about PS1--->PS2? One dominant market leader to another.
 

Oddduck

Member
Short. Sighted. Ps2 success gave you a shitty expensive ps3 launch no one wanted. Xbox 360 success gives you an xbone living room drm entertainment hub people are laughing at. Wii runaway success gives you a Wii u no one will touchPad due to old tech.

The underdogs take the next cycle because they are depserste to take risk and innovative, or they know they'd lose. Market leaders play it safe and stick to their long term vision. You need competition to foster change and disrupt that vision.

Can you imagine if there was only one box now, that drove out the other two and no new players releasing another the next cycle? You'd be in a terrible position. Trust the experts.

Does this logic apply to the handheld market where Nintendo dominated for many generations with Game Boy, Game Boy Color, Game Boy Advance, Nintendo DS, and Nintendo 3DS?
 

John Harker

Definitely doesn't make things up as he goes along.
Ok, what about PS1--->PS2? One dominant market leader to another.

There was a lot of competition in the ps1 era.
It was because of the success of the platform - and the crazy innovation Sony brought to the table coming off the mistakes of so many players, that they sold so well over that cycle. Which is exactly my point.
 
There was a lot of competition in the ps1 era.
It was because of the success of the platform - and the crazy innovation Sony brought to the table coming off the mistakes of so many players, that they sold so well over that cycle. Which is exactly my point.

So is mobile and PC not competition then?

Or the fact that it's entirely unlikely MS is about to drop the XB1 anytime soon so competition will persist from them even if slight
 

Keirnoth

Banned
I think the overly long generation has left less demand for the previous generation platform. Sony seems unable or unwilling to drive PS3 lower, so they may be happy just letting the platform slowly die off.

This pretty much. Gamers have been vying for a new generation for several years, so it's not surprising people were quick to leave their old consoles for their new ones.

Seeing how the PS2 had an over 12 year lifespan, and we're already on the 7th year of the PS3's lifespan, I do wonder for how long the PS3 is going to last. How has the PS3 done in its 7th year compared to the PS2 in its 7th year? I'm too lazy to Google/search for the stats, but I'm thinking its sales performance would be below that of its older brother.
 
I love these times in NPD threads, because they're usually much more quiet and it's safer to discuss results because the whole world isn't watching you.

GAF becomes quite...explosive when results first come out.


NPD Tie ratio comparisons:


Launch month:

XB1 tie ratio = 1.98
PS4 tie ratio = 1.89


Launch through January:

XB1 tie ratio = 2.71
PS4 tie ratio = 2.11


Launch through February:

XB1 tie ratio = 2.75
PS4 tie ratio = 2.18


Launch through March:

XB1 tie ratio = 2.96
PS4 tie ratio = 2.33


Again, the PS4 has a larger proliferation of free-to-play / digital games, and Titanfall sales were a boon to the Xbox One retail ecosystem.
 

John Harker

Definitely doesn't make things up as he goes along.
Does this logic apply to the handheld market where Nintendo dominated for many generations with Game Boy, Game Boy Color, Game Boy Advance, Nintendo DS, and Nintendo 3DS?

Yup. Look how expensive that ecosystem was. Look how closed and controlled it was. There was no real competition. The PSP forced Nintendo to look at things they didn't care about, graphics, online, whatever. And it was still so fragile that mobile can come in SO quickly with an open system, low pricing, and totally disrupt their empire. I can't wait to see what Nintendo does next i n his space. Hell I'm losing money on that platform but as a gamer, bring on competition and innovation!

Edit:

I'm not replying to anyone trying to spin my conversation into a console wars debate. Why assume I'm talking about any one platform? I've said a million times over 8+ years that I want a diverse, open, competitive and successful industry. Do I touch my Xbox one? Rarely. Do I want it to sell? Of course. Rising tide raises all ships.

Edit: tho I'm not all rosy, there are always things that are no longer sustainable or able to be monetizrd, and some of these devices need to be shot and there players need to come back with something the market responds better to.
 
I love these times in NPD threads, because they're usually much more quiet and it's safer to discuss results because the whole world isn't watching you.

GAF becomes quite...explosive when results first come out.

I also enjoy the lull when people start to discuss the sales more in-depth

NPD Tie ratio comparisons:
.

PS4's tie ratio seems to be improving. I'm sure ISS helped with that
 

Keirnoth

Banned
I love these times in NPD threads, because they're usually much more quiet and it's safer to discuss results because the whole world isn't watching you.

GAF becomes quite...explosive when results first come out.


NPD Tie ratio comparisons:


Launch month:

XB1 tie ratio = 1.98
PS4 tie ratio = 1.89


Launch through January:

XB1 tie ratio = 2.71
PS4 tie ratio = 2.11


Launch through February:

XB1 tie ratio = 2.75
PS4 tie ratio = 2.18


Launch through March:

XB1 tie ratio = 2.96
PS4 tie ratio = 2.33


Again, the PS4 has a larger proliferation of free-to-play / digital games, and Titanfall sales were a boon to the Xbox One retail ecosystem.

What you talkin about? The explosions are the best part. Makes for entertaining posting. Plus some of the best image edits come from them.

Makes me wonder though. If it wasn't for Titanfall, what would the XBone's numbers be? Although the PS4 has been behind the XBone since its launch in terms of attach rate, it's been slowly getting closer and closer to the XBone's. TF helped the XBone get a bit of a gap, but that gap doesn't seem as big as it should be for something that was supposed to be that system's "killer app".
 

Anth0ny

Member
That's....a large range.
150K is doable though. But not much more than that I think.

That's quite the range. Can't see it tripling or quadrupling it's usual 60-70k though.

yeah now that I think about it, I'd say 150k-250k. May is too weird of a month to hit 300k considering Wii U's situation. I'm also assuming they're going to have a Mario Kart 8 Wii U bundle ready for launch day. If not, it'll definitely be closer to that 150k figure, possibly less.

Would those numbers be a part of the May NPD or June NPD? considering the game is out May 30.
 
Top Bottom