• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Batman v. Superman RT Thread: like standing ovations in rain

Status
Not open for further replies.

duckroll

Member
How many times has the thread cycled back to debating Iron Man 3 now? Twice? Thrice? Lol.

IRON MAN 3 ROCKS AND IF YOU DISAGREE YOUR OPINION IS WRONG. :)
 

Betty

Banned
Iron Man 3 wasn't good at all.

Having yet another business villain who's ultimate goal was to take over Stark's enterprise was so drawn out by that point.

And then Guy Pierce breathes fire and Don Cheadle just goes "really?" but then it cuts so we don't see how the fuck he escapes...no desire to rewatch.
 
Funnily enough, I preferred Iron Man 2. At least it didn't drag.

Still a bad action movie though.

MCU might never reach the heights of Iron Man and The Avengers.
 

Shaanyboi

Banned
How many times has the thread cycled back to debating Iron Man 3 now? Twice? Thrice? Lol.

IRON MAN 3 ROCKS AND IF YOU DISAGREE YOUR OPINION IS WRONG. :)

FUCKIN A! HOUSE PARTY PROTOCOL ENGAGED MOTHERFUCKERS!

giphy.gif
 
Iron man 3 had blue and made me smile during the New Years scene

Also had Yensin the god make a cameo

Plus pepper wore the iron man suit :3 I liked that part

Everything else was meh , the suit fucking up was zzzzzzz, just use the GOAT avengers suit and the movies over
 
I liked IM3, but I kind of wish it came after CA2, and could have been about Tony finding out Hydra killed his parents, so he goes on a fucking manhunt across the globe taking them out.

I would want the shit out of that movie.
 

Divvy

Canadians burned my passport
I mean, if you're going to Iron Man 3 looking for a superhero power fantasy, then yeah, it's not gonna satisfy you.

But if you're looking for a goddamn good time?

👌
 
Having now read through all 150+ pages (full of rationalizing and shitting on MCU films to prop this one up), I'm now more excited than ever to see this. I have tickets for Friday at 8 PM at the biggest theatre in Toronto.

This is going to be a dumpster fire of the highest order. I can't wait!
 

CassSept

Member
I guess I'm lucky I don't care much about source material when watching comic book movies because Iron Man 3 was easily one of MCU's best.
 
Damn, down to 33? lol. I just saw it. Loved it. Crowd was also way into it and they went insane when WW showed up. I am proud to be in the minority that likes this film. :)
 

Kelsdesu

Member
Iron Man 3 was dogshit.

I mean it's actually a pretty good representation of the comic character in that he jobs and jobs hard, but coming off IM1 and The Avengers, it was such a massive disappointment.

You keep thinking it's going to get awesome, and then it just never does. The suit malfunctions... again. Runs out of battery power again. Gets blown apart by a truck like its a Frogger arcade machine.

Absolute dogshit.


Well.. Whats its RT?
 

VanWinkle

Member
I am proud to be in the minority that likes this film. :)

I almost guarantee you that you will be in the majority, not the minority.

Maybe, but I'm still going to see it. This could honestly run into "so bad, it's good" territory. I cannot wait.

It seems like if you kept an open mind about its quality (since there are plenty of people who like it), you would be more likely to enjoy it.
 

manfestival

Member
I guess I'm lucky I don't care much about source material when watching comic book movies because Iron Man 3 was easily one of MCU's best.

Yeah ironman 3 is kinda like spiderman 3 to me. It pretty much killed the source material(mandarin and extremis were jokes) but I liked the movie regardless.
 
Well that's it.

RT is a garbage site. The Shadow is fucking awesome.

Fucking fraud ass site

Many of those older reviews are basically pre-internet when people still read stuff and critics didn't cater to anyone other than themselves. So I don't take any of those 'averages' seriously.
It should also be noted that today previously individual opinions may cater a lot more to the consensus due to people going to RT instead of the individual critic. In order to stand out and get quoted (thereby attention and clicks for advertisements) you have to be more 'edgy' than previous times would have needed you to be.

I remember the review for Starship Troopers back when it was released ('97) in our TV guide fondly because that reviewer was one of few to point out that the movie was paced fast so you wouldn't think about all the violence you were seeing, whereas everybody else was too busy booing it to notice that. It's a cult classic for a reason, and finding a good critic is even harder today than in the past. That said, at least the aggregate scoring makes it easier to point out the fakes who just review other people's reviews, which is something that happens in book reviews a lot.

I don't think RT is a good measure of criticism, shadenfreude about BvS aside.
 

Sanctuary

Member
People put waaaay too much weight into RT. I'm glad that it exists, but my goodness, it is NOT a good metric for the quality of the movie. For example, people keep going on about Zootopia having a 99% RT score, but the actual rating average is 8.1. Still great, but not so crazy sounding as a "99%". Deadpool is 84% certified fresh, but the rating average is 6.9. Brothers Grimsby has a 38% RT score with a rating average of 4.7, while BvS has a 33% RT score with a rating average of 5.2.

Basically, all of these little RT comparisons and putting so much weight on RT score is just kind of silly. It doesn't seem to be a universally good movie, but saying it's a 33% makes it sound worse than it actually is.

Rotten Tomatoes has been extremely consistent for me since '99. Usually if it's a documentary, I'll completely ignore the score since it seems like critics can't seem to keep it in their pants regarding documentaries for whatever reason, but everything else has been pretty much reliable. For the most part anyway. I've found exactly one movie that they slammed hard that I enjoyed a lot, as did everyone else that I knew within my age group.

If there's something that I am interested in seeing, anything above 70% and it's usually spot on as to whether or not I'll enjoy it, and it has nothing at all to do with reading a review, and having it color my perception going in either. I've tested that time and time again. Anything considered "rotten", usually is for me.
 
I don't even care about the source material. I don't think I ever picked up a real comic book in my life. Iron Man 3 was just dull and too long.
 

Khezu

Member
Ironman 3 was great.
The Shadow was also great, the dad from everybody loves Raymond was in it.
Daredevil was also not thaaat bad.
 
It seems like if you kept an open mind about its quality (since there are plenty of people who like it), you would be more likely to enjoy it.

Please. I know when a film critically hits 30-50% acceptance, it's going to be (at best) a polarizing film. I know exactly what I'm getting into.

Nothing said so far in this topic speaks highly at all to the film, and your attempt to dissuade me is laughable.

I know exactly what this will be, and that's why I want to see it so much. Not just for myself, but for the audience reaction.

Have you seen the film yet?
 

Timu

Member
Iron Man 1>Iron Man 3>Iron Man 2 IMO. Also Iron Man 3 was pretty good, not amazing but not completely terrible.
 

VanWinkle

Member
Please. I know when a film critically hits 30-50% acceptance, it's going to be (at best) a polarizing film. I know exactly what I'm getting into.

Nothing said so far in this topic speaks highly at all to the film, and your attempt to dissuade me is laughable.

I know exactly what this will be, and that's why I want to see it so much. Not just for myself, but for the audience reaction.

Have you seen the film yet?

I have not seen it. I am also not trying to dissuade you as I don't even know if I'll like the movie. I just know that going into something having already formed an opinion on it is stupid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom