Javthusiast
Banned
Well the long rumored thing finally came to be. Dislike count will be hidden. You can dislike all you want, but only the creator will see them.
Basically a cowardly move to protect big corporations.
www.youtube.com##ytd-toggle-button-renderer.style-scope:nth-child(1) > a:nth-child(1) > yt-formatted-string:nth-child(2)
www.youtube.com##ytd-toggle-button-renderer.style-scope:nth-child(2) > a:nth-child(1) > yt-formatted-string:nth-child(2)
If there is no standard higher than the ideals of one’s society, there exists no possibility of taking a critical distance from those ideals. But the mere fact that we can raise the question of the worth of the ideals of our society shows that there is something in man that is not altogether enslaved to his society, and therefore that we are able, and even obliged, to look for a standard with reference to which we can judge of the ideals of our society, as well as of any other society. This standard cannot be found in the needs of the society concerned.
Earlier in 2021, YouTube experimented with making the public dislike count private to see if it would help reduce dislike attacks across the platform. And after analysis conducted in July of this year, we did see a reduction.
There's some awful and graphic content which is still allowed, not even age restricted and you can see from the thumbnail.Great move to increase the amount of extremist content that I may inadvertently watch.
But the number without context is meaningless - you have no idea why the video has such a high number of dislikes. Your post is exactly an argument of why the number of dislikes should be hidden. I would wash it should also go for likes.Dislikes are awesome as you can weed out the shitty videos right off the bat when you see it has a high dislike ratio.
Gaf-tube (video)Half of Youtube's mission is "to give everyone a voice?" Huh?
While that's obviously not true, it's a really weird think to say when they are talking about removing options for users to express themselves within the video that said it.
We need a good, privately owned alternative. Badly.
Rumble is actually doing pretty decent. But yeah, these corpo monopolies (by design) are only going to get worse. Boiling that frog.Half of Youtube's mission is "to give everyone a voice?" Huh?
While that's obviously not true, it's a really weird think to say when they are talking about removing options for users to express themselves within the video that said it.
We need a good, privately owned alternative. Badly.
I'll sign up and give it a try.Rumble is actually doing pretty decent. But yeah, these corpo monopolies (by design) are only going to get worse. Boiling that frog.
Nah.But the number without context is meaningless - you have no idea why the video has such a high number of dislikes. Your post is exactly an argument of why the number of dislikes should be hidden. I would wash it should also go for likes.
That's what comments are for.But the number without context is meaningless - you have no idea why the video has such a high number of dislikes. Your post is exactly an argument of why the number of dislikes should be hidden. I would wash it should also go for likes.
Unfortunately best you can do is nothing - don't give likes or 'invisible' dislikes, don't comment (it'll raise the popularity of the video) and don't give any free clicks. And use adblock, of course.Then likes have become meaningless.
I thought he was writing the final Game of Thrones book. Hey you, stop watching baseball and get back to work.
Now the new metric will be views:like ratio since we don’t have dislikes.Then likes have become meaningless.
Google couldn't create a yotube competitor app so they bought it.
They couldn't make a video which people would like "insert youtube rewind" so they changed algorithm to hide dislikes.
And then they will pay people like Varitasium who will be making a video soon saying why this is a good thing while saying he is sponsered by google.