People are still hanging onto that "so called leak" I see lolI wonder if Sony will allow Spiderman on PC. According to the nvidia leaks its the only blockbuster not being made. They are even porting Ratchet and Clank. (2016)
I think NPD doesn't count bundled game as a "sale".Wasn't this game in like every bundle? Of course it has a good attach rate.
I don't mean "official" bundles, it was included in all the retailer forced bundles for a long time.I think NPD doesn't count bundled game as a "sale".
That leak is 100% confirmed by Nvidia it's just that there is A LOT of placeholder stuff that shouldn't be taken as confirmed.People are still hanging onto that "so called leak" I see lol
I'm pretty sure that no one cared about the Spider-man games until Sony made a good game
I’d say that Arkham Asylum narrowly beats Spider-Man due to its superior map design, combat and atmosphere. I’d say that AA is comfortably a better game than MM. But yeah, probably AA, Spider-Man and then Spider-Man 2 in that order for the top 3.
LMAOO nice try to move the goal post.How when you're showing games from over 10 years ago?
Pretty sure anyone can get a license from Marvel Games to make a game using the Spider-Man IP, even Xbox, same applies to Wolverine. Sony just published a PS4 console exclusive based off of a non-exclusive license they obtained from Marvel, don't see anything wrong with that.One of the biggest IP in the world, suddenly made exclusive by the largest 1st party.
Why is no one up in arms about that
Hmmmm that's not the sameGo Woke Revenue Grow
So why before Sony the Spider-man games sold very poor?One of the biggest IP in the world, suddenly made exclusive by the largest 1st party.
Why is no one up in arms about that
His post said no one cared about Spidey games until Sony. That's blatantly not true, unless you move goal posts to a single console gen. I can think of multiple Spidey games I loved prior to Insomiacs single Spidey game. Hell, prior to the two games I listed. Insomniac was made big by Spidey. Not the other way around. No way in hell any other IP of theirs could have made this kind of money. Especially since Spidey as a property is on a high note right now with just about everything.And how were things going after that?
LMAOO nice try to move the goal post.
It's confirmed real lol. What do you meanPeople are still hanging onto that "so called leak" I see lol
Not the same as what?Hmmmm that's not the same
Spiderman 2 was the most successful and shipped a few million. This is a different level entirelyHis post said no one cared about Spidey games until Sony. That's blatantly not true, unless you move goal posts to a single console gen. I can think of multiple Spidey games I loved prior to Insomiacs single Spidey game. Hell, prior to the two games I listed. Insomniac was made big by Spidey. Not the other way around. No way in hell any other IP of theirs could have made this kind of money. Especially since Spidey as a property is on a high note right now with just about everything.
Aw now it’s about sales, nah bruh, u exposed. The og post said “I'm pretty sure that no one cared about the Spider-man games until Sony made a good game”. That’s a flat out lie. Don’t bring sales into this, that’s irrelevant. I don’t play sales, we play games.What goal post? Spider-Man games wasn't some big seller before Sony released the new games now they selling 20 million units , I was replying to someone who asked why no one was upset about Spider-Man going exclusive.
Its because everyone had only 40 bucks left after spending 500$ on a PS5.
Sony has to consider a game a failure if it doesnt reach 10 million in sales at this point.
Yes it's about sales this whole thread is about sales what the hell are you even talking about?Aw now it’s about sales, nah bruh, u exposed. The og post said “I'm pretty sure that no one cared about the Spider-man games until Sony made a good game”. That’s a flat out lie. Don’t bring sales into this, that’s irrelevant. I don’t play sales, we play games.
you need a good developer to achieve that, a well known IP is not enough.One of the biggest IP in the world, suddenly made exclusive by the largest 1st party.
Why is no one up in arms about that
Thankfully MS has one experienced in the Spider-Man IP now.you need a good developer to achieve that, a well known IP is not enough.
I am pretty sure the Spiderman games sold pretty well anyway, hence why Activision made so many over the years.I'm pretty sure that no one cared about the Spider-man games until Sony made a good game
Nope Spider Man has only existed on the PS4, prior to that it was a figment of your imagination and not an IP that existed since 1964.I am pretty sure the Spiderman games sold pretty well anyway, hence why Activision made so many over the years.
Prior to Sony taking over.
I am pretty sure the Spiderman games sold pretty well anyway, hence why Activision made so many over the years.
Prior to Sony taking over.
Reception[edit]
Reception
Aggregate score
Review scores
Aggregator Score Metacritic iOS: 58/100[6]
PC: 57/100[7]
PS3: 57/100[8]
PS4: 49/100[9]
WIIU: 58/100[10]
X360: 55/100[11]
XONE: 46/100[12]
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 received generally unfavorable reviews upon release, with most of the criticism aimed at the graphics, story, and glitches. On Metacritic, the iOS version of the game has a weighted aggregate rating of 58/100 based on 14 reviews,[6] the PlayStation 3 version of the game has 57/100 based on 4 reviews,[8] and the PlayStation 4 version of the game has 49/100 based on 44 reviews.[9]
Publication Score Destructoid 6/10[13] Eurogamer 2/10[13] GameSpot 5/10[14] GamesRadar+ [15]GameTrailers 5.3/10[16] IGN 5.4/10[17] Joystiq [18]OXM (US) 7/10[19] PC Gamer (UK) 55/100[20] Polygon 6/10[21] TouchArcade iOS: [22]
The Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 versions were reviewed as "inferior" to the PlayStation 4 and Xbox One versions, primarily due to the fact that the older console versions suffered from poor lighting, frame rate drops, and poorly detailed textures. The PS4 version of the game received a 5.4/10 from IGN.[17] The Xbox One version of the game received a 5.5/10 from Digital-Tutors stating the biggest issue was "...it just isn't polished, and based on the many issues we found with the game it looks thrown together in a rush trying to get it out the door in time for the release of the movie".
Bajo and Hex from ABC's Good Game found the game disappointing and both scored it a 4/10, with Hex saying: "This feels like a poor copy-paste job of The Amazing Spider-Man, with most of the good bits removed".[23]
Eurogamer's Dan Whitehead scored the game a 2 out of 10, saying "it's like a part of me has died". Whitehead was very disappointed in the game because, as he is a big fan of Spider-Man, he felt that the game provided no significant fun for the player, whereas past Spider-Man games at least provided something. Whitehead stated: "Sullied by lacklustre gameplay and trampled by technical shoddiness, this time Spidey hasn't been done in by the Sinister Six, but reduced to a Terrible Two".[24]
Tom McShea from GameSpot scored the game a 5/10. McShea called the representation of Spider-Man "enjoyable", and liked the "satisfying" boss battles, but criticized the controls, side-missions, and combat. McShea summarized his review by saying: "The biggest failing of The Amazing Spider-Man 2 is how familiar it feels. In fact, there have been other open-world games starring Spider-Man that walk a remarkably similar path. So there weren't many surprises, nothing that jumped out and made me take notice. Still, being able to spend time with Spider-Man was enough for me to stomach the various problems, just because he's a fun character to listen to. There's nothing majorly wrong with The Amazing Spider-Man 2, after all. There's just not a lot right with it, either".[14]
Richard Grisham of GamesRadar was more positive of the game, giving it a 3 out of 5. He called the combat "shallow" but "enjoyable", praised the collectibles, and liked the "entertaining, fun" story. He did feel as though the game was a dated experience, and disliked the controls and mission variety.[15]
In his review for Polygon, Justin McElroy scored the game a 6/10 and wrote: "I've accepted that there's probably never going to be a truly great Spider-Man game. If the dispiriting The Amazing Spider-Man 2 is any indication, Activision and Beenox may have reached the same conclusion. There have been many worse Spider-Man games than this. But I can't recall one that's swung so conceptually close to greatness only to let poor execution drag it back to Earth".[21]
You know what's funny....This is how the last Spider-Man game before Sony took it over was received
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014 video game) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Why not on 2022?@R3claimer117 @Riky , friendly reminder to keep that same energy come 2023.
You know what's funny....
Not alot changed as far as gameplay goes from that game to Insomniac, but reception did.
None of them beat Ultimate Spider-Man or Spider-Man 2 in my clouded recollection.
I guess that's one way to see it.What’s funny is you’re actually trying to downplay the quality, success, and critically acclaim of Insomniac’s Spider-Man vs what came before. But I’m sure there are dozens that agree with you.
Are you okay?This is how the last Spider-Man game before Sony took it over was received
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014 video game) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Spiderman 2 comes out next yearWhy not on 2022?