• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Will the Gears of War franchise ever return to the relevancy it once had?

GooseMan69

Member
What happened? The first game was mind blowing at the time. There was nothing like it. Despite two successful sequels, the series stagnated after. It lost its identity. 4 and 5 were basically high budget gamepass fodder.

Is a God of War esque resurgence even feasible at this point? Memes aside, was Cliffy B actually holding this franchise up on his back?
 

Airbus Jr

Banned
It lost its identity. 4 and 5 were basically high budget gamepass fodder.

Is a God of War esque resurgence even feasible at this point?
Sory im confused

First you said that it lost its identity despite 4 and 5 are keeping the same thing and gameplay are esentially the same from the previous 3 game?

How can it lost its identity when they re not changed much?

And then youre demanding a radical changes ?
 
Last edited:

Black_Stride

do not tempt fate do not contrain Wonder Woman's thighs do not do not
The last Gears game was a while ago and we are still talking about it today.
It must still be relevant.

The Coalitions are magincians with that engine, and their branch usually has features that Epic ends up making taking and putting into the main branch.
So you can just imagine what kind of advancements they have made with Unreal Engine 5, which is already a powerhouse like engine.




Its an easy game to shit on because people who dont play it think Gears 1 - 6 play exactly the same.
I do full runs pretty much every year, and you can feel the evolution from Gears 3 to 4.
Gears 5 soo good to play.


Gears is one of those games that has a very low skill floor.....then an astronomically high skill ceiling, so playing it in passing youll say well this is easy and basic, then you face real competition and you are like these guys arent playing the same game are they?

I dont consider myself high tier, but atleast well above average.
And even in Horde mode youll see how far apart the floor and the ceiling are, youll have teammates who are literally just duck, shoot, move, duck, shoot.......then they are shocked they got zero kills from rounds 1 through 20.
Then youll have a guy on the team the round just started and half the wave is gone.
How did you even get to that side of the map that quickly?


The wall is only there for you to bounce off, and/or to take a quick.....and I mean quick breather.....its not your house.
 

Flutta

Banned
No Way Thinking GIF
 

Chukhopops

Member
What’s with all the Gears threads lately?

Personally I don’t care much for the story but the series is relevant to me for its MP, both 4 and 5 were great experiences.

There’s something unique about how those games play and control compared to other shooters which I really enjoy.
 

Leyasu

Banned
The question should really be:

Will GAF ever return to relevancy whilst console war threads are allowed to thrive and fester?
 

GametimeUK

Member
I still love Gears. 4, 5 and Hivebusters were crazy good and I had a great time playing them. They were such a visual treat too on both console and PC. Gears is still massively relevant to me.

Will it be as relevant to the mainstream audience as it once was back then? Probably not, but I don't really care either. If I get new games I'm the series and I enjoy them that's all that matters to me.
 

JackSparr0w

Banned
Why man? The multiplayer has always been the main selling point and it’s not like 5 wasn’t riddled with MTX anyway. Get it F2P with a 5 year road map and maybe the game wouldn’t have 100 concurrent users 3 years after launch.
Because I've never played a Gears campaign that I didn't enjoy. Every non battle royale multiplayer shooter is suffering playerbase wise and I don't think Gears could change that.
 
Last edited:

Banjo64

cumsessed
That's like BS, I play Gears 5 MP daily and there's like 10,000-15,000 players on console. Not 100.
That’s absolute bollocks :messenger_tears_of_joy: 15k :messenger_tears_of_joy::messenger_tears_of_joy::messenger_tears_of_joy:

There’s 140 players playing it on Steam right now.

I’d love to see the hard numbers for Xbox as Gears 5 isn’t in the top 50 games played in the UK and is behind some really average games.
 

Banjo64

cumsessed
Because I've never played a Gears campaign that I didn't enjoy. Every non battle royale multiplayer shooter is suffering playerbase wise and I don't think Gears could change that.
Probably true to some extent but Overwatch, Destiny 2 and Six Siege continue to have healthy player bases.
 

JohnnyFootball

GerAlt-Right. Ciriously.
I don't see any of the MS games regaining what they once were. That's on MS. Halo MCC was a disaster. Halo 5 was unremarkable and Halo Infinite was a huge money sink that could never keep an audience.

Gears 4 and 5 were pretty solid games IMO.
 
Last edited:
To when xbox only had gears and halo, and many players were discovering shooters? Don't think so. I'm still waiting for 2, 3 snd judgement to be brought to pc, Microsoft
 

rofif

Can’t Git Gud
Sory im confused

First you said that it lost its identity despite 4 and 5 are keeping the same thing and gameplay are esentially the same from the previous 3 game?

How can it lost its identity when they re not changed much?

And then youre demanding a radical changes ?
you don't know these games well enough if YOu dont see 4 and 5 as lost identity.
These are no longer the same games as trilogy. It is completely different.
Would be better if they gow 2018 it
 

STARSBarry

Gold Member
I think it still has its fanbase, but I don't think it will be as mainstream as it was with the original trilogy. It seems the gameing landscape has moved on, I still have my golden lancer in my parents loft from the midnight launch of gears 2, it just dousent have that draw anymore.

But these days it's battle royales and CoD or CoD battle Royale that are discussed in the office, not Gears.
 
Last edited:
Seeing all the recent threads about it on GAF, it looks like it's still pretty relevant :messenger_open_mouth:
I'm not sure to what extent GAF could be considered a reliable indicator of what's relevant among gamers as a whole. This place is utterly obsessed with shit 99% of people simply don't care about, whether it's minuscule differences in frame rate or the politics of female NPC hair length.
 

TrueLegend

Member
I wanna see fable and other ips in forefront... Ratchet and Clank wasn't a forefront game. But Insomniac took it to that level. A lot of people are tired of hearing gears and halo because it's going on for 15 years....like enough is enough dude. You have other IPs too in the deep freezer.
 

Dibils2k

Member
Only if they do a complete overhaul of the combat mechanics. The same old sitting behind a cover wall mowing down bullet sponge enemies until the wave is over and the music stops and repeat, just doesn't do it anymore.
the issue they have is MP, they cant make drastic gameplay changes, its always very popular (and has microtransaction) and so they cant alienate those people in hope of bringing new single player players
 

Airbus Jr

Banned
you don't know these games well enough if YOu dont see 4 and 5 as lost identity.
These are no longer the same games as trilogy. It is completely different.
Would be better if they gow 2018 it
Completly different? Whats so different? Gameplay mechanic still the same
 
Last edited:

Chukhopops

Member
Only if they do a complete overhaul of the combat mechanics. The same old sitting behind a cover wall mowing down bullet sponge enemies until the wave is over and the music stops and repeat, just doesn't do it anymore.
I don’t think you’ve played a lot of MP if that’s what you think the combat is about - even at an average level you have to use all mobility options to succeed.

SP in Easy/Normal difficulty isn’t a good way to judge a specific gameplay generally speaking.
 

DenchDeckard

Moderated wildly
Is gears of war 6 about to be announced or something.....How is there like numerous threads popping up over the last few days...

must be paid content, surely?

Looks like people re starved for it!
 
Last edited:
Doubt it. MS doesn't seem to let their assigned IP studios (coalition, 343, etc) stray too far off from what got them where they are, and the series needs a real reboot.
 
The problem with Gears and Halo is that they don't want to upset the hardcore but aging and dwindling fanbases they have by doing any radical changes. But the flipside is all the young kids do not give a flying fuck about classic 4v4 multiplayer games like we all did.

It's a shame but I feel like these games are doomed to slowly die out one way or another. Maybe time for a new IP and leave these ones to breathe for 10 years.
 

Shubh_C63

Member
Of all the tentpole franchise MS had Halo is likely the only one who can return to relevancy, even when Coalition is a better studio.

I loved the Ski roaming part which people hate here. Devs should have some balls to bring new ideas, turn the map upside down, bring gore back, go to fucking space I don't care, introduce mutant allies, steal things from Outriders, but please keep getting better at TPS storytelling because I can't see Gears Gameplay getting any better than its right now, which is sad.
 
Top Bottom