64bitmodels
Reverse groomer.
I think those people are called "AMD users" lolThere will always be cheap bastards that don't want to pay the Nvidia tax to keep an updated gaming PC. LOL
I think those people are called "AMD users" lolThere will always be cheap bastards that don't want to pay the Nvidia tax to keep an updated gaming PC. LOL
They’re still a lot simpler, they’re closer to side quests than a main complex storyline.Live service games aren't just PVP multiplayer.
Destiny is a live service game and has all the elements you mention
Replaced free under warranty.....Also up against a 360 which had rrod which bolstered sales thanks to people getting more consoles than usual
Not true at all, except for people who were trigger happy buying a new system and throwing out their old one since MS offered I think a 3 year extended warranty on the early systems.Also up against a 360 which had rrod which bolstered sales thanks to people getting more consoles than usual
False.PC is crucial for any GaaS from Playstation. Otherwise is DOA.
pc guarantees cheaters. So that's a big drawPC is crucial for any GaaS from Playstation. Otherwise is DOA.
Ain't it great?Day and date for everything by next gen, the gap keep getting shorter.
I'm thinking they're going to have it ready by the time the show launches, or just after the last episode of the show.It’s called The Last of Us Online btw. See Druckmann’s tweet.
Doubt it comes to PS4 because I don’t think it will ship until 2024.
Not every single console user buys or plays a game. 10% if you're lucky.I dont get it. PS3 had plenty of first party mp games. You dont need to go to PC to sustain anything. This is a console that is going to sell 100 million units. If you cant sustain an audience with 100 million players then maybe you should try and make better games.
And I dont care. I have PC with a GPU 2x more powerful than my PS5. Id rather game on PC anyway. I am simply pointing out misleading statements by this exec. Something i called out immediately while you all were in denial.
Yep. That's why variety exists.Not every single console user buys or plays a game. 10% if you're lucky.
Doubt it cause the show is coming Q1/Q2 2023.I'm thinking they're going to have it ready by the time the show launches, or just after the last episode of the show.
I assumed it was a Fall show, but that makes sense. I still expect it end of next year the latest to time with the show hype and market it after each episode in little ads.Doubt it cause the show is coming Q1/Q2 2023.
Meanwhile Naughty Dog are only promising a “big update” on the game at some point in 2023. (June?)
Feels like it’s not coming til like Q1 2024.
Literally pocket change for a big return.They’d still be out of pocket compared to porting once it has gone gold. The only reason MS switched to day and date on PC was because they moved to DirectX.
They’d be wise to get it out next year for sure. Let’s hope.I assumed it was a Fall show, but that makes sense. I still expect it end of next year the latest to time with the show hype and market it after each episode in little ads.
I mean they do get the fastest rasterization cards which are 99% of the games people play.I think those people are called "AMD users" lol
The key argument is multifold:Do some people really hate the idea of other people playing on PC rather than on a console that much?
This topic in particular always seems to generate pages and pages of arguing and discussion, but I'm struggling to see the big deal tbh.
If some are concerned about the Playstation brand suffering or something, Sony will still generate even more revenue in the end by supporting PC.
Other than that I can't imagine why anyone would even care if they already decide which platform they'll be playing on.
The vast majority of people will always play on consoles because it's financially more viable and convenient than investing time and money in a gaming PC.
Giving people the option to play Sony 1st party titles on PC isn't going to change that anytime soon. Gamers win regardless so why the fuss?
Mindsets 1&2 sound irrational to me lol. I totally get being a fan of something, but taking it to the extent that you'd want others to miss out is just extremely bizarre, and I agree, it does seem counterintuitive.The key argument is multifold:
1. You got armchair profit supporters. Never mind the product itself, it’s gotten so bad people protect the balance sheets. I don’t think even the typical hardcore Apple fan cares about bragging that Apple makes $100 Billion profit per year. They just enjoy the brand and product.
2. The “you got to make me feel good” strategy. Having a game on their system is fun, but for some people it’s more fun when other people don’t play it. It’s counter intuitive because you’d think they’d enjoy it more if more people play it especially since gaming can have cross play MP lobbies making the online user base bigger and longer lasting in MP game. Guess not.
3. Also part of it is the “there’s no point me buying the console if it’s on PC” rhetoric. Which is going to be most BS since how many gamers are there who game on PS and will suddenly dump their console for a PC rig because the games are now dual platform? Ok maybe some. But can’t be that many as Sony execs are going full blown PC porting. So unless this strategy backfires big time on them, even they know there’s more to gain from PC users and indifferent gamers than fully transitioning PS to PC gamers.
Bring shuhei and Ken backHermen politely told famitsu he doesn't give a shit about japanese games or PlayStation legacy.
Hermen politely told famitsu he doesn't give a shit about japanese games or PlayStation legacy.
A ps5 only gaas game would be dead on arrival.False.
Looks like this needs updating
Although in hindsight this was a little premature
People taking "at least one year" to mean "one year" and further extrapolating that to "day and date very soon" is a fun ride. It was always going to be a fluid situation. Evergreen titles are probably going to utilize the "at least" portion of that statement while games without legs will probably just be the "one year" portion. Getting people into the console ecosystem is important for Sony and if this strategy has an impact on that, this is just a faucet that can be tightened or loosened as needed.
I'm also assuming PS+ Essential and Premium offerings are going to follow the PC release schedule.
Very Soon is from them. TLOU isnt a GaaS Game AFAIK.
pc guarantees cheaters. So that's a big draw
A ps5 only gaas game would be dead on arrival.
Sea of Thieves launched on a struggling XBox One and was dead on arr... oh wait.
usually takes me a year at least to finally get around to playing all those pop titles everyone hypes up anyway, i understand the whole vibe about getting in the mix and playing it on release at the same time as "everyone else" but quite honestly i think a lot of that is brainwashing and marketing. because it's obvious that there's a huge incentive to publishers to convince people that they absolutely can't miss a launch and it's mandatory to play day one and pay full price, to that i give a big middle finger.So if you are in rush to play first party games but inferior version for scamming 70$ US/ 90 CAD, buy a ps5.
If you wait a year ( for now, soon it will be less ) you will get:
- A better version of those single player games
- They will work on whatever pc u own 30 years from now
-Not to worrying about console backward compatibility and devs not updating their game or Sony trying to be scum as they are now and charge you 70$ For that 60 frames toggle..
-You get it cheaper day one on pc from many third party sellers.
….
Does anyone wants to buy my ps5 ?
Agreed. Honestly maybe it’s just COD is the only game I buy day one. Rest ? Yeah it can wait . Because I never finish a game anyway.usually takes me a year at least to finally get around to playing all those pop titles everyone hypes up anyway, i understand the whole vibe about getting in the mix and playing it on release at the same time as "everyone else" but quite honestly i think a lot of that is brainwashing and marketing. because it's obvious that there's a huge incentive to publishers to convince people that they absolutely can't miss a launch and it's mandatory to play day one and pay full price, to that i give a big middle finger.
Ummm ....yes ...it's a basic matter of fairness. Having cross play set as the default makes every multuplayer game an unfair playing field right from the start. It's total bullshitIt wasn't that long ago that most (I recall one guy was anti-crossplay) of the enthusiasts were crucifying them for not allowing cross play in online games. Now we're going to crucify them for not gating off multi-player?
narratives:
- Sony will never release their games on PC
- Only non-flagship games will come out on PC
- Sony will only release PS4 games on PC
- Sony will release PS5 games after several years on PC
- Sony will release games after a year on PC (***We are here***)
- All Sony games will be released on PS5 and PC simultaneously
no is not. now they have to design games around the weak ass pcs and ps4 out there.So Sony finally admitted they want to put some PlayStation games day one on PC and people are having a fit. Why? It’s a good thing.
no is not. now they have to design games around the weak ass pcs and ps4 out there.
why buy a Ferrari and then have to run with 100 horsepower?
garbage.