Devolution
Member
So I read through most of the thread.
Why exactly is it so hard for game "journalists," to admit to a mistake or fault? Instead, we get self-aggrandizing claims of fighting for the greater good and for the betterment of us all.
Sure, the gaming industry seems to have many issues with women. I don't see why those issues are being conflated with the overtly exaggerated artwork of the characters in this game.
There doesn't, to me, appear to be anything inherently "sexist" or "misogynist" about either the art of the Sorceress when viewed in the wider context of the art of the game as a whole. Nor is there anything inherently more sexist about Dragon's Crown than a cavalcade of potential examples that one could draw from. (Although, I'm not going to speak for women who could potentially find it offensive.)
If anything the game doesn't really conform to the typical gamer sensibilities with regard to sex appeal - although I won't pretend to speak for straight men here either. I just don't see anything specifically about Dragon's Crown that should be denigrated and eliminated from the industry.
All of this nonsense could have seemingly been avoided by a simple:
"I retract the story and the insults towards Kamitani. When viewed in a broader context, Kamitani's art and Dragon's Crown isn't the best example to use to illustrate problems in the industry. But there are issues, and they are worth exploring, and I intend to do so in future articles."
Yes, there seem to be abundant issues in the game industry with regard to women and minorities of all nature; so why not write something of value that examines some of those issues in depth?
Sensationalism gets more hits than thoughtful deconstructions of issues facing minorities in games.