Reminds me, I think Jaffe said something along the lines of, you can't rewrite the dictionary to fit your agenda. Which is pretty true.
Yeah, I'm not too fond of deviating from dictionary definitions if I can help it.
Also on another note, I'm confused as to why people are using things like "14 year old boys" as justification for arguments.
Is there supposed to be some kind of implied shame with sharing interests with someone who is 14 years old? I'm sure a lot of the things I like could be also interesting to people who are 14 years old. I don't see any shame in that.
Things like breasts, butts, abs, whether on males or females people usually find appealing from puberty all the way till old age so I don't see what value there is in calling these features juvenile.
It kind of reminds me about how people would use the "natural" argument to explain why being homosexual was wrong. Something being natural or unnatural has no positive or negative qualities beyond very specific cases so it didn't make any sense at all to use that as justification for discrimination. It's not a 1:1 comparison but hopefully you understand my meaning.
So with the "14 year old boy" thing I don't think it's a good idea to use that as justification for why something is bad because quite a few things can fall under that label that persist well into old age and are most certainly not bad.
I had some more stuff to write out but I lost my train of thought so I'm just going to end this post here.