Bogroll
Likes moldy games
I'm pleased, 1440p on a 2080 average 54 fpsLooks so bad I would not be shocked if it would run at 120fps. That's not againts console makers, that's againtsMicrosoftUbisoft.
.
Last edited:
I'm pleased, 1440p on a 2080 average 54 fpsLooks so bad I would not be shocked if it would run at 120fps. That's not againts console makers, that's againtsMicrosoftUbisoft.
I have seen quite a few vids, and they are usually shit quality. It was the same with vids of Odyssey. If you know of a 4k direct feed vid, please post it.But...we are talking about Valhalla, have you seen video couple of weeks before posted here, when it looked like a garbage, including animation?
I have seen quite a few vids, and they are usually shit quality. It was the same with vids of Odyssey. If you know of a 4k direct feed vid, please post it.
I'm pleased, 1440p on a 2080 average 54 fps .
I think some of that maybe due to it being in England.Good.
Seeing some of the recent gameplay and how it didn't look noticeably better than odyssey (if anything it actually seems to look worse) it made no sense for it not to be 60fps on next gen consoles.
I was not talking about Oddysey, but Valhalla, I need to find that thread. I know that Odyssey looks good.
Oh here it is:
what it is called when there are dozens of video where the game looks fine , you ignore all of them and only consider the one where the game looks really bad ?Buddy, you should get yourself checked if you think Odyssey was fantastic.
I was not talking about Oddysey, but Valhalla, I need to find that thread. I know that Odyssey looks good.
Oh here it is:
I dont agree. Odyssey maxed out on PC looks amazing, and better than Horizon ZD by the way, i have not been impressed with that game. Odyssey also produced a stuttery 50-60fps at 100% usage on my 6700k. It took my new 2700X to get a locked 60fps. I actually find it quite impressive they are hitting 60fps at 4k on XSX, and i presume PS5.
I mean even so, it looks bad from the animation standpoint and that sort of thing, I don't think this should be just throw it from the table, just because it's lower-bitrate...But thats what i mean, the bitrate on that vid is atrocious. It was a promotional vid sent out by Ubisoft to Youtubers.
Odyssey can also look shit on many Youtube vids. When you are literally playing it in front of you though, at max settings, Odyssey looks amazing.
What happened to all the people saying it was 30 fps to downplay the Series X's power?
I'm pleased, 1440p on a 2080 average 54 fps
.
It was the same team making this that made Origins, another fantastic looking game maxed on PC. There is literally no reason why this would look worse, no reason.But that's the issue, Odyssey actually looks really good, this doesn't. I have not seen a single video that compared to Odyssey. If you told me they got Odyssey running at 4k 60fps XSX maxed out that would be impressive. This game looks like a different team handled it with a less ambitious visual options. It looks like it could have came out around 2014.
Still not Dual Sense. But it's fine : )Now that makes more sense
Thumbs down! Thumbs down! Boo hiss. And double boo hiss.
I loved being on the water in Odyssey. Sometimes after work I’d launch Odyssey just to go sailing.
Vikings and a settlement you can maintain. Nah, fam, more boat.
Still not Dual Sense. But it's fine : )
It was the same team making this that made Origins, another fantastic looking game maxed on PC. There is literally no reason why this would look worse, no reason.
In fact the best vid i have seen of Valhalla so far is the 10 secs or so in the Series S reveal vid at the end, its actually good quality video and the game looked great imo.
So thats new spin by Sony fanboys?
Aww keep that salt flowing.
What happened to all the people saying it was 30 fps to downplay the Series X's power?
Shitty joke, dont mind me xdWhat?
I'm pleased, 1440p on a 2080 average 54 fps
.
Yeah not the greatest cpu, but apparently 3080 tests coming in at 67fps average on ACO @ 4k, not sure what cpu but i can imagine its a pretty decent cpu.With that system he wont even get 60 fps at 1080p stable.
With that system he wont even get 60 fps at 1080p stable.
How is that a spin?So thats new spin by Sony fanboys?
Aww keep that salt flowing.
Ironically it can be the oppositeAC is an interesting case. It's very HD heavy because of texture streaming. AC:Odd performed a shitload better once you got an SSD. Now, I firmly believe all the "SSD is maaaaagic" marketing bullshit from Sony is just that...but in AC's case it could actually matter a lot.
Ubisoft needs to work on some kind of hysteresis and rate control in their resource manager; it is not DRM contrary to popular belief that causes high CPU load on PC, but insane driver overhead caused by really naïve resource management for such a vast open-world game.
It should be easily fixable. Clearly the dev. team focuses on consoles because there appears to be no consideration given to the significantly higher throughput of PC storage devices such as my NVMe SSDs in RAID0. The faster your disk is and the more CPU cores you have, the more of an unpredictable performance nightmare this all becomes.
Thus, we have a repeat of Arkham Knight and nobody seems to have learned anything
What happened to all the people saying it was 30 fps to downplay the Series X's power?
Could this indicate that the Series X is more powerful than a 2080/2080 Super?
What happened to all the people saying it was 30 fps to downplay the Series X's power?
The game looks like shit imo
How is that a spin?
This game looks good to you? That 60fps kool aid must be SWEEEEET
Whaaa
I paid $800 for my GPU alone and I can't play Assassin's Creed Valhalla at 4K/60
Whaaa
*I buy a Series X for $499 and play at 4K/60
Credibility Test:
Watch that and get back to me with some honest feedback.
Do you usually make ignorant generalizations in real life?
Huge misinformed/misguided assumptions. Graphical settings are adjustable on PC. You don’t know what settings developers have chosen to achieve this on consoles.
Do you usually make ignorant generalizations in real life?
Huge misinformed/misguided assumptions. Graphical settings are adjustable on PC. You don’t know what settings developers have chosen to achieve this on consoles.
Ubisoft said it was 30fps. All the people trolling the 30fps were fanboys.It is nice to see Ubisoft changed their mind in the fps department.
Ubisoft said 30fps... not all people.
Buddy, you should get yourself checked if you think Odyssey was fantastic.
That's the dream. The boat stuff was okay but the trips were very long. I try not to fast travel too much in open world games to appreciate their size more but Odyssey definitely pushed my patience on that front.I liked the Boating, but wasn't a huge fan of combat and it just made me want to play AC4
I think the riverboat stuff won't be nearly as boaty as Odyssey, just a lot of raiding.