Thats the first offer. Who says Sony cant counter with a different one?you just forgot to mention that all microtransaction profits, and even game sales, would stay with microsoft;
microsoft move with an absurd offer to pass the image of good
What makes you think I didn't think for myself and just came to a different conclusion to you?Im convinced these neo members and some regulars are bots at this point, do you all say the same thing? can you not think for yourself?
It's like you copy paste it off twitter and put it everywhere
I'm well aware. Still doesn't speak to Sony "not having a choice"MLB doesn't have PC releases.. MLB AM (advanced Media) publishes both the Switch and Xbox (retail release separate from game pass) as well. Sony does not publish those versions, they only publish the PS4/5 version.
Thank you. Wasn’t going to waste my timeIt’s published by MLB Advanced Media on Xbox and Switch, not Sony.
I'm well aware. Still doesn't speak to Sony "not having a choice"
Where the game is released and developed for. They still develop the game.
If they didn't have a choice there would be "the show" releases everywhere. This misinformation has been spread since it went multiplatform.
Because it does nothing to prove a point you were making and false information you're spreading.Thank you. Wasn’t going to waste my time
What does Sony put on Xbox? MLB The Show obviously doesn’t count as Sony has no choice in that.
Source? You show me the proof.Because it does nothing to prove a point you were making and false information you're spreading.
The person I quoted above said that no choice =forced?I don't think anyone has outright said officially that MLB FORCED Sony's hand, but their cagey statements kinda make it seem like that's the case.
"MLB decided to bring the franchise to more players", not Sony, in an official statement from someone at playstation.
Clearly they didn't decide that.
Oh no? What's this:Thank you. Wasn’t going to waste my time
Source? You show me the proof.
Basically they lost because no current laws prevent this kind of merger, new laws are needed. Regulators are outdated and all the best lawyers that can pass new regulation laws are working for big tech.Former FTC chair explains why Microsoft prevailed in Activision merger case
Former acting FTC chair William Kovacic explains why the Federal Trade Commission lost its preliminary injunction hearing in the Activision merger case.www.tweaktown.com
The person I quoted above said that no choice =forced?
Oh no? What's this:
Buy SegaMore IP to mismanage and kill off. Great, a true day for celebration!
I wonder how MS will feel when this acquisition does nothing to significantly increase their hardware sales
No I was referring to 93x. That's who I quoted originally.I said no one has officially gone on record to say that it was a forced decision on MLB's part.
I doubt anyone from Sony or MLB will ever say that out loud.
But when you have Sony reps saying that it was MLB's decision to bring the game to more platforms, you can put 2 and 2 together. It sounds like it was a part of the license renewal agreement that Sony did a few years ago for the MLB franchise to bring it to more consoles, and now it's on Xbox and Switch.
Why should MS give up 1st party games for nothing? MS already gives them the Minecraft games day and date, even with no obligation to do so.
What does Sony put on Xbox? MLB The Show obviously doesn’t count as Sony has no choice in that.
At the very least, I’d call every game an exclusive and not clarify it coming to PS. Then I’d release it later on PS if Sony agreed to an 80/20 split.
I looked because I hadn't seen you in this thread. You're calling "people" out for something you did yourself. You came back to gloat after disappearing when it looked like the acquisition might be blocked.Not much point to be honest, no news and just the same old back and fourths, came back when we had finally got somewhere, but your insult is very good, quite inventive to be honest. Glad you felt the need to look into my post history, as I have absolutely zero interest in yours.
Microsoft goal was never to increase Xbox sales, it was to decrease PlayStation salesMore IP to mismanage and kill off. Great, a true day for celebration!
I wonder how MS will feel when this acquisition does nothing to significantly increase their hardware sales
I didn't even reply with a differing opinion, so i can tell you're not thinking again.What makes you think I didn't think for myself and just came to a different conclusion to you?
That isn't the offer to Sony, can we stop pretending it is.you just forgot to mention that all microtransaction profits, and even game sales, would stay with microsoft;
microsoft move with an absurd offer to pass the image of good
It wasnt? I responded to him assuming it was.That isn't the offer to Sony, can we stop pretending it is.
That is what Nvidia etc have agreed to - because that is how their services operate - they don't even have a store to sell games or microtransactions so of course they aren't getting any of that money.It wasnt? I responded to him assuming it was.
Well done Columbo, your gold star is in the post, Sorry that I do not live on the thread like some, I will notify you, when I am planning another absence.I looked because I hadn't seen you in this thread. You're calling "people" out for something you did yourself. You came back to gloat after disappearing when it looked like the acquisition might be blocked.
according to court documents released to the public, it wasIt wasnt? I responded to him assuming it was.
Didn’t Phil say he didn’t want to put Minecraft dungeons on PS? I can’t remember if the Notch contract stipulations were ever confirmed.No I was referring to 93x. That's who I quoted originally.
Xbox and Nintendo always had MLB rights. They could have released an MLB game at any time but wouldn't /didn't have the studio to
Didn’t Phil say he didn’t want to put Minecraft dungeons on PS? I can’t remember if the Notch contract stipulations were ever confirmed.
I think the Minecraft games aren't able to be made exclusive due to contractual obligations. Wasn't that just leaked in the emails?Didn’t Phil say he didn’t want to put Minecraft dungeons on PS? I can’t remember if the Notch contract stipulations were ever confirmed.
No contract has been confirmed or leaked as part of the plethora of documents that were released in the trials.
Phil said he wanted to find a way but they didn't end up doing that, it could be purely a financial reason that they saw they wouldn't make enough revenue and changed course.
Seems that if Phil wanted to he could have if not for something else. Maybe the contract or maybe MS reminded him they own Minecraft not Xbox and want the brand strong.I think the Minecraft games aren't able to be made exclusive due to contractual obligations. Wasn't that just leaked in the emails?
Well they should realize this is waste money. They need to focus on buying studios and at least 1 publisher.If you think MS owning Call of Duty means that Playstation will fight LESS for exclusivity, you've lost your mind.
If laws don't change big techs will buy everything. They will consolidate every business. Problem is they can pay whatever they need for things stay the way they are.Basically they lost because no current laws prevent this kind of merger, new laws are needed. Regulators are outdated and all the best lawyers that can pass new regulation laws are working for big tech.
More IP to mismanage and kill off. Great, a true day for celebration!
I wonder how MS will feel when this acquisition does nothing to significantly increase their hardware sales
I call that sus.
Sony makes MLB the show for Xbox. Nothing stops them from getting the new Xbox console info.
I think this is just theatrical performance, nothing more than that.
in 20 years our grown ass kids are going to log into a website for "Mega Corporation ABCDEFG1234567" to pay for their Rent, their car note, their car insurance, their heat, their electricity, their entertainment, their medicine, their food and their tuition, all of these thing offered by 1 company.....oh and collect their paycheck.If laws don't change big techs will buy everything. They will consolidate every business. Problem is they can pay whatever they need for things stay the way they are.
im self medicating to stay awake and power through are you not a real gamer or something?
it was mentioned in the emails that he wanted to but could not.Seems that if Phil wanted to he could have if not for something else. Maybe the contract or maybe MS reminded him they own Minecraft not Xbox and want the brand strong.
Took that from the thread of the year:Phil’s internal email, read in court, showed that he was “frustrated” that Minecraft Dungeons is multiplatform because of the original contract.
He asked his team to “find ways” to make it exclusive.
Xbox CMO emails Phil, “This [Minecraft Dungeons] should be exclusive.”
Phil replied, “I agree.”
The state of video game "journalism" reveals itself when these people try to comment on something other than just games.Oh he "still firmly believes" that now? lmao what a clown!
At least they will have convinced a fanbase that one corporate giant owning everything is great for the average person and mobilize their fanbase on social media!in 20 years our grown ass kids are going to log into a website for "Mega Corporation ABCDEFG1234567" to pay for their Rent, their car note, their car insurance, their heat, their electricity, their entertainment, their medicine, their food and their tuition, all of these thing offered by 1 company.....oh and collect their paycheck.
As if bethesda needed ps6 dev kits or any info from here forward .... ABK wont need ps6 infos either .... just a guessBethesda has PS5 devs kits, they won’t get preproduction information on the PS6.
You really think Sony made the choice to make an Xbox version all by themselves? It was part of the contract renewal. Matter of fact, it’s MLB themselves who publish the Xbox version. And it was MLB themselves…. Not Sony…. Who suggested the game goes onto gamepass. This article is from back when they first announced it for Xbox. I’m curious, is it available on PS+ these days?Proof?
It's 100% a pro Microsoft article.It is an alternate universe article because everything they wrote about the CMA is factually wrong. Not least the final paragraph suggesting the CMA's powers are being reduced from this deal interaction, when they are being given more power and expanding by 250 staff currently.
The article is at least 50% hopium.
Once again. This has nothing to do with MLB "forcing" or Sony having "no choice" Sony did not have an exclusive MLB license.You really think Sony made the choice to make an Xbox version all by themselves? It was part of the contract renewal. Matter of fact, it’s MLB themselves who publish the Xbox version. And it was MLB themselves…. Not Sony…. Who suggested the game goes onto gamepass. This article is from back when they first announced it for Xbox. I’m curious, is it available on PS+ these days?
Sony Suggests MLB Made the Decision to Include MLB The Show 21 on Xbox Game Pass
But doesn't have any words for PS5, PS4 ownerswww.pushsquare.com
I agree. Explains why they have had basically the same hardware between them for the last two generations. They had the same Jaguar chips last gen…. This gen they both got the same CPUs again. they must k ow a lil something about what each other is doing.I honestly think both sides have a good idea what the other is doing most of the time. With the exception of the occasional outlier like the memory increase on PS4.
Why play games, when you can play acquisition argument battle?There's lots of Xbox people still sitting in here when they have the Best Deal In Gaming™ to pick through hundreds of games.
I reply on here when I empty my piss jugs from gamepass sessionsThere's lots of Xbox people still sitting in here when they have the Best Deal In Gaming™ to pick through hundreds of games.
You really think Sony made the choice to make an Xbox version all by themselves? It was part of the contract renewal. Matter of fact, it’s MLB themselves who publish the Xbox version. And it was MLB themselves…. Not Sony…. Who suggested the game goes onto gamepass. This article is from back when they first announced it for Xbox. I’m curious, is it available on PS+ these days?
Sony Suggests MLB Made the Decision to Include MLB The Show 21 on Xbox Game Pass
But doesn't have any words for PS5, PS4 ownerswww.pushsquare.com
If Sony firmly believes that COD will become exclusive in some form until next gen maybe is time to let it go when they are still the dominant console and access better the situation of leaving without COD revenue.... I dont think is that crazy ... but who knows what the fuck will happenWhy would Sony want less games on their platform?
What do these guys smoke?
There's lots of Xbox people still sitting in here when they have the Best Deal In Gaming™ to pick through hundreds of games.
I agree. Explains why they have had basically the same hardware between them for the last two generations. They had the same Jaguar chips last gen…. This gen they both got the same CPUs again. they must k ow a lil something about what each other is doing.
You have a vast experience of having alts here at GAF, but in this case you are most definitely wrong.Mostly dormant account who started lol emojis shortly after ezekiel got permanently banned.