• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Nintendo 'Revolution' FAQ by IGNCube

GigaDrive

Banned
IGNcube's Nintendo "Revolution" FAQ
Absolutely everything we currently know about the successor to Nintendo's GameCube home console.

June 10, 2004 - Nintendo's GameCube console is far from dead, but that hasn't stopped the company from announcing that it is underway with a next-generation successor, codenamed "Revolution." The system, still very much a mystery, has been given an appropriate codename if Nintendo is to be believed: the publisher says that the console will revolutionize the way people play games. No easy challenge, but if any company can do it, Nintendo can.

To help keep readers informed about any and all developments surrounding the Nintendo Revolution, IGNcube has created the end-all FAQ for the console. The following information represents everything we currently know about the machine.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q: What is the Nintendo Revolution?

A: The official codename for the successor to GameCube.

Q: How long has the Revolution been in development?

A: Preliminary development on Revolution began shortly after the release of Nintendo GameCube.


Q: When was the Nintendo Revolution codename announced?

A:: On May 11, 2004 at Nintendo's pre-Electronics Entertainment Expo 2004 press conference, which took place in Los Angeles, California. (The console had been tentatively referred to as "GCNext" by the press before the unveiling of the official codename.)

Q: Who announced the codename Nintendo Revolution?

A: Nintendo president Satoru Iwata. On stage at Nintendo's pre-E3 2004 press conference, Iwata said:

"Different also defines our approach to our next home system. It won't simply be new or include new technologies. Better technology is good, but not enough. Today's consoles already offer fairly realistic expressions so simply beefing up the graphics will not let most of us see a difference. So what should a new machine do? Much more. An unprecedented gameplay experience. Something no other machine has delivered before.

"The definition for a new machine must be different. I want you to know that Nintendo is working on our next system and that system will create a gaming revolution. Internal development is underway.

"I could give you our technical specs, as I'd know you'd like that, but I won't for a simple reason: they really don't matter. The time when horsepower alone made all the difference is over.

"Work on Revolution is well underway. When you see it you will be excited because you will experience a gaming revolution."

Q: Will Revolution feature more powerful hardware than GameCube?

A: Yes.

Q: What are Revolution's technical specs?

A: Currently unknown.

Rumors abound indicated that Nintendo could separately be working on two systems and that ultimately one would be chosen for retail. System 1 allegedly featured a 2.7GHz PowerPC G5 processor, 512MBs of RAM, and a 600MHz graphics chip. System 2 allegedly featured dual 1.8GHz PowerPC G5 processors. 256MBS of DDR Main Memory RAM, 128MBS of GDDR3 Video RAM and a 500MHz graphics chip. Both systems allegedly featured a built in 15GB hard drive. As of this time, these rumors cannot be validated.

Q: How will Revolution be unique?

A: That is the big question. The console is codenamed Revolution for a reason: Nintendo expects it to be revolutionary. The system will, according to Nintendo, fundamentally change how games are played -- literally. Nintendo president Satoru Iwata has said in recent interviews that the dual-screened Nintendo DS offers a hint of what to expect from Revolution. DS players can use a stylus pen to input control data into the portable device. It's very possible that Revolution may feature similar functionality.

Nintendo believes that technology alone cannot advance videogames, which is why it plans to take Revolution into a dramatic new direction.

Iwata in June 2004 described Revolution as a videogame machine "of a different nature that does not follow the conventional path of new game systems that increase speed and visual quality for making elaborate games." He added: "The rule of satisfying customers by increasing specifications worked once, but no longer applies now."

Q: Will Revolution feature screens on the console or the controller?

A: No. At a June 2004 analyst briefing in Japan, Nintendo president Satoru Iwata said: We have no intention of making a two screen console akin to the [Nintendo] DS."

Q: Will Revolution hook up to a television?

A: Yes. It will also be able to interface with a computer monitor. In June 2004 Nintendo engineer Genyo Takeda said: "You'll be able to play [Revolution] not just by linking up to a television but to a computer monitor as well."

Q: Will Revolution go online?

A: Currently unknown. Nintendo continues to stress that it does not yet believe in an online gaming model from a business standpoint. However, the company at E3 2004 announced that its portable device Nintendo DS would be able to go online using 802.11b and 802.11g Wi-Fi wireless capabilities. The company may seek to offer a similar option for Revolution owners.






Q: Who are Nintendo's hardware partners on Revolution?

A: During the course of the last two years, several major hardware companies have been linked to Revolution including IBM, ATI, and NEC.

In December 2002 Bloomberg reported that Nintendo had agreed to collaborate with NEC on a system LSI that would serve as the core for the new console.

Just a few months later GameCube graphics chip maker ATI announced a vague "technology development agreement" for use in future "Nintendo products." Unconfirmed reports from insiders alleged that ATI had been in development with the graphics chip for Revolution well before that announcement.

And several unsubstantiated rumors have suggested that IBM will deliver a modified version of its PowerPC G5 processor for Revolution.

Q: When will Revolution be released?

A: "If you're asking for a specific date for our next system -- we don't have one. Nintendo is going to remain competitive and will launch around the same time as competitors… not later than," said Nintendo of America's vice president of corporate affairs in a May 2004 interview. This is the same line other Nintendo executives, including company president Satoru Iwata, have said for months.

Nintendo feels that its inability to bring GameCube to market before PlayStation 2 gave Sony an advantage that it could never overcome. For that reason, Nintendo will not launch Revolution after PlayStation 3.

Revolution will launch sometime in 2006.

Q: How much will Revolution cost?

A:: Currently unknown. But we feel confident that Nintendo will aim for a mass-market friendly price on the lower side of the spectrum.

Q: When will Nintendo reveal more about Revolution?

A: At the Electronics Entertainment Expo 2005, which begins May 2005 in Los Angeles.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IGNcube will update the Revolution FAQ with new information as it becomes available. Tune in next week when we take a look at the next-generation console's software partners and key franchises.

http://cube.ign.com/articles/522/522559p1.html


so, N5 aka GCNext aka Revolution has been in development since either late 2001, or early 2002. making it the first Nintendo console developed in this century and decade.
 

Fatalah

Member
I think Nintendo's finally making sense of their whole idea of being 'different from other console companies'. Ever since the Gamecube they said they weren't running the same race as Sony and MSFT--- they've said they're looking at innovation.

What's odd is that innovation WAS online play this generation, and they totally missed that boat. So what was SO innovative about the GC? Wireless controllers?

With the DS, I think I'm more excited about Nintendo's creativity NOW than I ever was with the GC.
 
It's going to be wireless hookups to your TV. The comment about being able to use a computer monitor leads me to believe the Rev will not have any wires of any kind. No controller, a/v, accesory wires of any kind, which is nice. :)

I don't know if i'm being Capt. Obvious here or not, but that is one of my guesses about how the Rev is going to go about it's biz.
 
I finally fucking get it!!!!


Nintendo is the APPLE of the console world!!!

WHY THE FUCK DID IT TAKE ME SO LONG TO GET THAT?!?!?! :(
 
Eh, people saying they were Apple when the GC launched, simply because of the fruity color. And the PowerPC/ATI thing too.

But I still bought my 'Cube on launch day, an Indigo one, with pride.
 
Q: Will Revolution feature more powerful hardware than GameCube?
A: Yes

OMG!! :eek: Revelation!


On a more serious note..

Q: Will Revolution feature screens on the console or the controller?
A: A: No. At a June 2004 analyst briefing in Japan, Nintendo president Satoru Iwata said: We have no intention of making a two screen console akin to the [Nintendo] DS."

Interesting. I was pretty sure they'd do a controller with a built in screen so "connectivity" style games wouldn't be so hard to organise controllers for (4 GBAs and 4 link cables)
 

sc0la

Unconfirmed Member
Red Dolphin said:
OMG!! :eek: Revelation!


On a more serious note..



Interesting. I was pretty sure they'd do a controller with a built in screen so "connectivity" style games wouldn't be so hard to organise controllers for (4 GBAs and 4 link cables)
Well I would think that they wouldn't want to take away gameboy necesity, since that is an extra sale, and since not everygame uses it so a controller like that would be expensive and hard to justify. That said I still wouldn't be surprised if they did something along those lines.

I fully expect next gen Connectivity between Revolution and DS or GBA2 to be wireless, it is clearly the direction they are moving towards for hooking things together (wavebird, DS blutooth, GBA wireless adapter) so that cuts out some of the hurdle.
 
i'm actually thinking that the revolution consoles themselves will have wireless connectivity. it fits perfectly with the revelation that it will be able to connect to tv's as well as monitors. why else would nintendo include that option? i'm also thinking about the comment iwata made about the ds giving a good idea of where they are going with the revolution. connectivity will never die!
 

GigaDrive

Banned
I think Revolution will indeed be totally wireless (controllers, audio/video, system link, internet/online) with the exception of power of course. but then that is probably too good to be true....
 
Q: Will Revolution feature screens on the console or the controller?
A: A: No. At a June 2004 analyst briefing in Japan, Nintendo president Satoru Iwata said: We have no intention of making a two screen console akin to the [Nintendo] DS."
It seems like IGN is making and odd assumption here though... What they meant by "two screen console" most likely was that it would not require two tvs, or anything wacky like that, and i believe that there was more to the quote than just what it says here. It would seem like a logical feature to have though, as they promoted it sooo much this gen. that, and wireless, which is assumed as well.
 
I love it, most of this stuff isn't even FAQ worthy.

Q: How long has the Revolution been in development?

A: Preliminary development on Revolution began shortly after the release of Nintendo GameCube.

No shit, that's how it ALWAYS works. How is this news? Why was this even bolded for GAF?

Leave it to IGN to turn nothing into an article.
 

Death

Banned
Is it possible that the next Nintendo console will be able to play Game Boy Advance or DS games from the getgo, akin to the Game Boy Advance player but already built into the hardware? That could be what they mean when they made reference to the DS/Revolution reference.
 
D

Deleted member 1235

Unconfirmed Member
StrikerObi said:
Leave it to IGN to turn nothing into an article.

How is a collection of all the info known on a next gen console nothing?
It was interesting enough to warrant a write up I think.
 
Top Bottom