Well someone has to make Agent!I heard Sony plans to announce this right after they finalize their purchase of Take 2/Rockstar, which is definitely absolutely positively still happening.
Fact is we know what Kojima can do without Metal Gear now (Death Stranding).Kojima is nothing without Metal Gear.
People are so thirsty for PS5 news
I mean the first 2 Metal Gear games before Metal Gear Solid lol
No that's...that's not what I was....nevermind. I would also like a Rising 2 personally, more than another Kojima MGS if I'm being honest.
Didn't I hear it was actually Sony that did that?They put out a rather successful Castlevania collection not too long ago.
Wait when did I become Gen X?no surprise
most people in newer generations are emotionally connected to the brand playstation at least in USA
![]()
this is the ranking for millennials
![]()
Wrong collection. Youre thinking of the Castlevania Requiem game that has the psp port of Symphony of the Night and Rondo.Didn't I hear it was actually Sony that did that?
Wait when did I become Gen X?
Even boomers didnt like Sears.no surprise
most people in newer generations are emotionally connected to the brand playstation at least in USA
![]()
this is the ranking for millennials
![]()
Ohhh shit you're rightWait, those are the three games that Bluepoint were hinting at in tweets.
Let's say this rumor is true. What happens next?
No way the acquisition rumor is true. They paid $223m for Insomniac, and Sony already owns the Spider Man and Ratchet IPs. How much would they have to pay to get the Castlevania, Silent Hill, AND Metal Gear IPs? Sony's been doing much better financially in recent years, but they're not Microsoft when it comes to having infinite money to spend on acquisitions. With that said, them working with Konami on new Silent Hill and Metal Gear games is much more plausible to me. Konami doesn't want to develop AAA games internally anymore. Sony would be happy to fund those games in exchange for exclusivity to boost the PS5's portfolio. Konami gets a cut of the profit without incurring any risks. Win-win for both sides.
Sony has WAAAAY more money than you realize.
Don't worry, I know. I'm a Sony shareholder. As I said, they are doing much better financially in recent years, but they're not anywhere on the level of a Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Google, etc. All those are near trillion dollar companies. Sony's market cap is in the $60B range, far lower than Microsoft. Sony has money, but they don't have an unlimited acquisition budget. That's my point. The IPs of Metal Gear, Silent Hill, and Castlevania would almost certainly be valued at over $1B. That's pocket change for someone like Microsoft, which has $500B just sitting in cash, but for Sony that's a much more significant investment.
Why should we trust in the word of HipHopGamer? What's his track record?It's not just 4chan, HipHopGamer said something similar last week.
That acquisition price seems a bit steep. Now I personally don't believe the rumors of IP acquisition but I'm having a hard time swallowing the idea that the three of them would be over $1 billion to acquire. Disney acquired Marvel and Lucasfilm for over $4 billion each. Silent Hill and Castlevania have waned hard in recent years. Metal Gear would certainly be worth more but that the three of them combined would be worth an asking price even 25% of what Marvel or Star Wars were bought for seems far fetched. Maybe you have better insight into that than I do. I'm not a shareholder of anything![]()
If the remake looks as good as the Final Fantasy 7 or Resident Evil 2/3 remakes, I say bring them onwhy are so many people excited for remakes when all people are pouting on about is new its most of the time? yes these games are good but surely new games would be better
If the remake looks as good as the Final Fantasy 7 or Resident Evil 2/3 remakes, I say bring them on
castlevania and silent hill has a good chance. With all this rumor. Metal gear not so much.
But a man can dream. Sony’s wallet damn possibilities.
I only care about MGS. If Sony got the IP it would be awesome if they made MGS3 and pretend the rest doesn’t exist. Just continue from after 2 and make the gameplay more like the first 3.
Ya you’re right. I just feel the series just got too messy as it went on and would be hard to continue from where it’s at now.Too funny! I think we all have that one series were we feel "ok...this 1 in the series never happened doe". It would be a funny thread. For me I don't know if I can say that with any MGS as even the ones that had a meh story I still liked enough to want it to be seen as part of the universe.
Like the story in MGSV was just horrid, but you can easily start Metal Gear 1 remake and Metal Gear 2 remake right after and I'd be ok with it.
Now FFX-2 on the other hand lol
I might make a thread on it, call it "What game in a series would you Bird Box". If I make the thread, I'll like it...maybe.
edit. Was too fun of an idea not to do.
![]()
What game in a series would you "Bird Box"??? (Never happened bro)
With great gaming series, comes great disappoints, ones sooooo bad, we actually purposely ignore one of the entries even exist. Some times for the lolz, some times cause we serious and don't want to have ViemFlashBacks. So if you could buy an IP, make a remake and actually correct a series by...www.neogaf.com
Also, the thing to keep in mind is usually with IP purchasing agreements comes the agreement to purchase publishing rights on previous titles. This alone in terms of digitals sales and remastered possibilities offers a lot of potential for recouping a $1b investment.I get the skepticism, but there are a bunch of factors you have to consider when looking at an acquisition. Let's look at SW for example. SW was owned by one person, George Lucas. At the time of the sale there were no movies in the works. Revenge of the Sith was already 7 years old at that point. Lucas was motivated to sell and the deal wouldn't need the approval of a bunch of investors. He could sell it for whatever price he wanted, and he decided to sell it for a bargain price of $4B to Disney, with a handshake agreement that his friend Kathleen Kennedy would run Lucasfilm. Marvel, on the other hand, was a company that wasn't doing well in 2009, when Disney acquired them. In a span of 10 years in the late 90's and early 2000's, they went through bankruptcy and multiple acquisitions/mergers and lawsuits. It was a terribly run company that incurred a lot of debt. Disney bought them and gave the a second life. And the rest is history.
Fast forward to now. Konami isn't necessarily in dire state to have to sell off their most valuable IPs. They may not be making AAA games with those IPs anymore, but they leverage those iPs in other ways, such as mobile games, TV/movies, and pachinko machines. And so if Sony wants to acquire those IPs, they'd have to pay a premium because otherwise there's not enough incentive for the Konami shareholders to approve the deal. Market value is not going to be enough to pry away those IPs when Konami isn't desperate to sell.
Ya you’re right. I just feel the series just got too messy as it went on and would be hard to continue from where it’s at now.
Well you have terrible ideas. I want Castlevania in the right hands, not EA making a sequel with holy water lootboxes or Naughty Dog making Simon Belmont an ugly lesbian.I hope so! Even if not Sony, if MS, Nintendo... heck, or even EA, someone, please, get those IP's!... with Konami they are just being forgotten.
Well you have terrible ideas. I want Castlevania in the right hands, not EA making a sequel with holy water lootboxes or Naughty Dog making Simon Belmont an ugly lesbian.
I wrote earlier in the topic either Sega or Capcom, the rest should keep their hands off. Sony has enough of its own properties either way, also they are allowed to make new IPs (and they make them all the time) why take and break (probably) old beloved franchises.Well you sound like you'd be mad about where ever it goes with that attitude.
"EA making a sequel with holy water lootboxes" ? Star Wars Fallen Order doesn't have any loot boxes so what makes you think if EA bought the IP they'd do that? Its really hard to argue they'd do this or that, when their latest stance on single player games is to not have it at all.
So if you are just going to assume and ignore the latest examples and look at faces to argue some "agenda", its easier to just say stop gaming all together. I don't think the IP can go to any publisher or team without criticism based on what you are stating.
Goes to MS "oh great, now its a F2P with lootboxes"
Goes to Activision "oh great, now its a F2P with lootboxes"
Goes to Ubisoft "oh great, now its open world with lootboxes"
Goes to Nintendo "now its kiddle and rated E"
Goes to Sega "now its never coming to America"
Goes to CDPR "oh now it has SJW stuff in it"
Goes to Remedy "oh now it has SJW stuff in it.....more"
I mean, you can go on and on with this tbh. Who is the "right hands" to you that has done nothing wrong....like ever? I think every publisher in gaming right now can fit some argument for negativity. Relax on the cancel culture stuff, using that logic no one can make any game ever.
I wrote earlier in the topic either Sega or Capcom
Sony has enough of its own properties
also they are allowed to make new IPs
Also, when has buying out studios and IPs became a positive thing?
And why do Sony fans feel like Sony should own all good IPs ever