JohnnyFootball
GerAlt-Right. Ciriously.
The simple fact of the matter is that you refuse to read between the lines and understand how business works. Before acquiring Bethesda and ABK, Xbox was a much much much smaller division, seen as a toy. Something that could easily fit in as a write off. Back then Phil, Greenberg and Booty could get by with not delivering and merely keeping their head above water.Well see it's exactly this kinds of talk that propegated the forums. MS just spent Billions on the xbox brand, has always had multiplatform games like Minecraft, etc, but your take away from 4 lesser known or older games being released multiplatform is that the Xbox console will cease to exist?
History and common sense? The history is MS has been commited to the console space for 22+ years and if anything have been spending more money to break into it, not less. I don't get how you come to this conclusion based on history, history of who?
Now that ABK and Bethesda (mostly ABK) are now in the picture, that division is no longer a small division, but a significant source of revenue.
Phil likely sold these acquisitions on the promise that they would increase their gaming marketshare. Did that happen? No.
In fact, they've lost marketshare, they have not increased their subscribers counts and somehow people like you are gullible enough to believe that MS is going to squander all that revenue from Playstation/Nintendo via ABK JUST so they can put Call of Duty on Gamepass Day 1....
Phil and Xbox flew too close to the sun and now the executives are no longer interested in treating Xbox like a toy. They want it to deliver. Starfield, had no impact, $349 consoles had no impact. Literally nothing has had a significant impact. They're no interested in Phil's promises anymore.
That's why.
Last edited: