JackMcGunns
Member
Really? And then you spout revisionist history right afterwards?
I think it's a joke about the Xbox slogan "beta tested in the future".
Haha, but seriously, I doubt that it was in reference to that.
Really? And then you spout revisionist history right afterwards?
I think it's a joke about the Xbox slogan "beta tested in the future".
No, you can stop us by sharing any credible rumor that Xbox was going to announce leaving the console business, and GAF entertained that rumor.Wow, did you even read the forums on the past month? This is exactly what happened last time, it started with a couple of older games and snowballed into total bs. It didn't even matter what the facts were anymore.
But by all means, let's keep starting rumor threads and go through round two.
No, you can stop us by sharing any credible rumor that Xbox was going to announce leaving the console business, and GAF entertained that rumor.
No. The whole forum was not up in arms declaring the Xbox was out of the business. Stop making shit up. You're seeing what you want to see.Some serious revisionist history there, the whole forum was up in arms and selling xboxes and declaring MS out of the console business. It was an implosion of epic proportions.
Your joking right? People were heading for the hills, crying bloody murder, and selling xboxes. Sony die hards declared outright victory and death to xbox. GAF didn't just entertain it, they beleived.
Your joking right? People were heading for the hills, crying bloody murder, and selling xboxes. Sony die hards declared outright victory and death to xbox. GAF didn't just entertain it, they beleived.
Starfield has little Skyrim DNA in it. it has far more Fallout 5 DNA in it.Now this is where we'll see major reversals of opinions. Starfield has major Skyrim DNA coursing through it. Unless people's opinions of Skyrim have soured over the years. I still think it's fun. Starfield is fun.
Sometimes you have to work with what you've got....Ah....that's right. Still.....Jedi Survivor is a awkward flex for any platform.
No, you can stop us by sharing any credible rumor that Xbox was going to announce leaving the console business, and GAF entertained that rumor.
Umm...
Leaving the console space was being deliberated internally at Microsoft. Revealed in the court case with the FTC and to regulators across the globe. 2027 being the critical date.
Xbox Will "Exit The Gaming Business" If Game Pass Doesn't Get Enough Subscribers
"If we do not make more progress than this off console, we would exit the gaming business."www.thegamer.com
Except nobody credibly reported that MS was exiting the console business.I don't see why that's Gafs fault. It's more like Microsoft were the ones that said it and not this community. If they didn't say anything then you could say it's just a bunch of rumors by fanboys.
unless its 60fps and 90% less load times its not worth it.
Im telling you its a loading simulator thats it, you load for literally every interaction
Except nobody credibly reported that MS was exiting the console business.
Its definitely not overstated. Here is my experience, say you have a quest in the city. Load to walk into that city, load to walk into the building the person is in, fast travel back to your ship (load), LOAD TO GET INTO THE SHIP, load to get to the next planet, load to get into the building the quest is in. Its absolutely unforgivable and im getting mad just thinking about how much loading there is. But yeah the empty planets with no vehicles and literally just open space is another one. Its an incomplete game, at this point its BARELY fallout 3Nah, I don't think so. The loading happens too often, certainly, due to the old ass engine, but primarily when entering/exiting buldings and such. The load time is extremely short. Not saying that isn't a valid criticism, but it is being overstated. If I'm going to point to negatives of Starfield then I'd point to the vast empty planets with no vehicles available to travel as the main gripe. Poor space exploration would be another. Load times are just a minor annoyance at best, imo.
Only because you were banned.Hypocracy zone? I wasn't even part of the implosion and massive overreaction.
Agreed. I would have easily put up with all the outdated quirks of Starfield IF exploration and wandering off the beaten path had been the focus. I have long said that the thing that made Skyrim/Fallout fun was wandering off the beaten path, exploring a cave and ending up in a full blown quest line. Instead you got landing on randomly generated planets with generic encounters. Bethesda totally missed what made their games fun. Sadly, no amount of modding can fix that.Nah, I don't think so. The loading happens too often, certainly, due to the old ass engine, but primarily when entering/exiting buldings and such. The load time is extremely short. Not saying that isn't a valid criticism, but it is being overstated. If I'm going to point to negatives of Starfield then I'd point to the vast empty planets with no vehicles available to travel as the main gripe. Poor space exploration would be another. Load times are just a minor annoyance at best, imo.
I don't see why that's Gafs fault. It's more like Microsoft were the ones that said it and not this community. If they didn't say anything then you could say it's just a bunch of rumors by fanboys.
Dont know what your talking about, Sony declared outright victory several years ago.Your joking right? People were heading for the hills, crying bloody murder, and selling xboxes. Sony die hards declared outright victory and death to xbox. GAF didn't just entertain it, they beleived.
Its definitely not overstated. Here is my experience, say you have a quest in the city. Load to walk into that city, load to walk into the building the person is in, fast travel back to your ship (load), LOAD TO GET INTO THE SHIP, load to get to the next planet, load to get into the building the quest is in. Its absolutely unforgivable and im getting mad just thinking about how much loading there is. But yeah the empty planets with no vehicles and literally just open space is another one. Its an incomplete game, at this point its BARELY fallout 3
GAF was also in full GameFAQs mode predicting no games were getting ported anywhere. Now we have GAF saying it ends with these four games. Just depends on what part of GAF you are looking at, I guess.
Tales from Tophers ass
The journey to the end is taken 1 step at time.That was hilarious, GAF was in full GameFAQS mode for awhile predicting the literal end of Xbox. I guess now we’ll just get a repeat every now and again when some “insider” predicts a game or two coming to other consoles. As I have always said to the doomsday crew:
Another we don't have any news to talk about so, lets post this thread.
The journey to the end is taken 1 step at time.
Who is this "GAF" poster you are speaking of?
Sony die hards declared outright victory and death to xbox. GAF didn't just entertain it, they beleived.
That’s just the standard behavior tho
Only because you were banned.
But your original comment is hyperbole like most of your other stuff. I think you read a few people joking and them equated that to being the feeling across the forum.
Had nothing to do with being banned, it was actually kind of interesting to watch it all unfold. The huge amounts of bias, the panic, the overreactions. I don't know what to say to you guys if you really think nobody blew it out of proportion, I think you need to re-read everything that went down.
It was epic, really. It was not a "a few people joking". But if you can't see the trees through the forest, not much I can do.
Where that mod support at
Yes, but that surfaced during the FTC trial - well before these rumors. Completely different instances.Umm...
Leaving the console space was being deliberated internally at Microsoft. Revealed in the court case with the FTC and to regulators across the globe. 2027 being the critical date.
Xbox Will "Exit The Gaming Business" If Game Pass Doesn't Get Enough Subscribers
"If we do not make more progress than this off console, we would exit the gaming business."www.thegamer.com
Yes, but that surfaced during the FTC trial - well before these rumors. Completely different instances.
TheDuck was saying that GAF entertained false rumors that MS was leaving the console business (when they announced Hi-Fi Rush), but that was never such a rumor.
I'll be surprised. Not like the Xbox series SSD is a slouch and couldn't cut down load times.The real question is if they will utilize the PS5 SSD to remove thr load screens? If not, forget it.
Exactly. Because there was no such rumor.A rumor that states that Microsoft would leave the console market immediately? I don't remember that being said to be honest.
Yep. The rumors were that Xbox will be bringing its first-party exclusive games to PS5 and Switch. And that rumor did turn out to be true.Just the rumors that Microsoft would be making big changes due to the way their system is performing. And those did come true.
Exactly. Because there was no such rumor.
Yep. The rumors were that Xbox will be bringing its first-party exclusive games to PS5 and Switch. And that rumor did turn out to be true.
Everything else was (very valid) speculation, i.e., what would be the end-result of this new direction. If history and common sense are anything to go by, the Xbox console will soon cease to exist because of this decision, leaving only PlayStation and Nintendo in the console market.
Well see it's exactly this kinds of talk that propegated the forums. MS just spent Billions on the xbox brand, has always had multiplatform games like Minecraft, etc, but your take away from 4 lesser known or older games being released multiplatform is that the Xbox console will cease to exist?
History and common sense? The history is MS has been commited to the console space for 22+ years and if anything have been spending more money to break into it, not less. I don't get how you come to this conclusion based on history, history of who?
That old ass engine they keep usingunless its 60fps and 90% less load times its not worth it.
Im telling you its a loading simulator thats it, you load for literally every interaction
Then i wont be touching the game until they fix it. Load screens like this in 2024 is just absurd.I'll be surprised. Not like the Xbox series SSD is a slouch and couldn't cut down load times.
It's probably more then just loading assets from storage slowing it down. Or maybe the engine is shit and that is the problem.
Which makes it even funnier!I was banned before all that news hit
That date has likely been moved up quite a bit. They have had no growth and aren't remotely close to getting near their goals.Exactly. It's not idle talk or speculation. It's Microsoft's internal deliberations. GP had until 2027, they were planning to pull the plug after that.
1. They spent billions on the Xbox brand, which I'm not speculating will go away. My speculation is only about the console itself.Well see it's exactly this kinds of talk that propegated the forums. MS just spent Billions on the xbox brand, has always had multiplatform games like Minecraft, etc, but your take away from 4 lesser known or older games being released multiplatform is that the Xbox console will cease to exist?
History and common sense? The history is MS has been commited to the console space for 22+ years and if anything have been spending more money to break into it, not less. I don't get how you come to this conclusion based on history, history of who?
Well see it's exactly this kinds of talk that propegated the forums. MS just spent Billions on the xbox brand, has always had multiplatform games like Minecraft, etc, but your take away from 4 lesser known or older games being released multiplatform is that the Xbox console will cease to exist?
History and common sense? The history is MS has been commited to the console space for 22+ years and if anything have been spending more money to break into it, not less. I don't get how you come to this conclusion based on history, history of who?