If those slides is something to believe, then this is probably how it ended up being.It would be a hilarious turn of events of this is the console which the SSD secret sauce ends up benefiting most.
The way these different iteration of consoles are named is so dumb. I legit lost track nor do I know which is the latest. And that is coming from a guy that browses gaming forums.
Your typical soccer moms and dads wont be able to differentiate these consoles when they’re looking to buy gifts for their kids and instead wind up dissapointing them with.
xbox
Xbox 360
Xbox one
Xbox one x
Xbox series x
Xbox series S or xbox S
??
Your typical soccer moms and dads wont be able to differentiate these consoles when they’re looking to buy gifts for their kids
1. This is not official Microsoft spec sheet.
2. Yes, if you own FH2 or FH3 digitally, you can still play them on Lockhart...It's like bitching that you won't be able to play PS4 discs on PS5 DE
Right, but my point is the cost of "scaling up" to 4K from 1080p is a third of the performance, across a range of benchmarks. So you can have the same quality level at 4K and 1080p, with hardware that differs by a factor of 3x.You realize that you are talking about games develped for console hardware then ported to PC and upscaled from there? And even PC only games are never targeting the high end hardware...they can just be scaled up.
Which was exactly my point......
You usually don`t develop high end=>low end but the other way around. Baseline is always the defining factor in scope.
That is neither how render pipelines work nor how software development works.
Tooling, staffing, QA, certification.....all those efforts just doubled.
And since downscaling is usually a lot harder than upscaling ...well you can fill in the rest.
Has to be dirt cheap to even be worthwhile. Even then I imagine a lot of casuals will just stick with their Xbox One /PS4 consoles for the time being.This shit is gonna fail so hard.
Ms will not leave 199 market to ps4 onlyThe only XBox on sale right now is the One S, and that is about to be replaced.
By Fall, there will probably just be two: Series S and Series X. So there won't be that much confusion.
I am telling you man, series S has so much potential and Microsoft despite not having major games at launch, has the potential to outsell PS5 because of Series S pricing. I don't see Sony pricing their PS5 DE anywhere as low as Series S.
Ms will not leave 199 market to ps4 only
So
X1s
Xss
Xsx
Will be sold for aNorher 2 years or so
Yeah nowhere near powerful enough, will be a 1080p machine.Performance target of the XSS 1440p / 60 fps......
Are they fucking retarded?
Yeah nowhere near powerful enough, will be a 1080p machine.
The correct answer was "We have a product for you, it's called the xbox360".You buy the more expensive version of the xbox. Was that really that difficult to comprehend?
If it is the "cheap version" then it should be cheap, 300€ is cheap, 400€ is not.
Lots of kids will be disappointed come Christmas asking for an XSX and getting XSS( parents - sure its the same thing but wayyyy cheaper)
uuuh---yes?Right, but my point is the cost of "scaling up" to 4K from 1080p is a third of the performance, across a range of benchmarks. So you can have the same quality level at 4K and 1080p, with hardware that differs by a factor of 3x.
Or in other words, resolution already eats up a huge chunk of the extra hardware resources on the XSX.
Since RS actually implemented a special resolution and other "pro" specific features and development time is costly....no that indeed wasn`t cheap for a project of this size. Nothing in software development is ever "cheap and quick" the moment it also has to be good.I guess it costed Rockstar the same to port Red Dead Redemption 2 for the PS4 Pro than make the game itself in the first place, am I right?
You mean the dolphin game? No AAA games will be 1440p/60fps.There are going to be some games at 1440p too.
And some with 60 fps too. I mean, the CPU in the Series S is stronger than the one in the PS5.
Since RS actually implemented a special resolution and other "pro" specific features and development time is costly....no that indeed wasn`t cheap for a project of this size. Nothing in software development is ever "cheap and quick" the moment it also has to be good.
You mean the dolphin game? No AAA games will be 1440p/60fps.
I am telling you man, series S has so much potential and Microsoft despite not having major games at launch, has the potential to outsell PS5 because of Series S pricing. I don't see Sony pricing their PS5 DE anywhere as low as Series S.
And that´s why you have a certification process by the platform holders on consoles.....Yes, in software development there is such a thing as cheap and quick ports.
Guess that´s your usual answer when you don`t like facts?But it's okay, the concern trolling by the Sony fans was a given.
I mentioned it in another thread, and this isn't meant to suck the wind out of the sails from this rumor, but what happens when a very demanding game releases for the XSX that forces it to reduce its resolution below 4k? Wouldn't that mean that the XSS version goes sub-1080?
I think the idea of a console that can hit next gen looks at 1080p is pretty novel. Statistically I think most people still have 1080p TVs. But it does present some interesting wrinkles.
DurrThe correct answer was "We have a product for you, it's called the xbox360".
You know it's shared memory pool so VRAM and RAM in one package and it's true that VRAM portion scale with resolution used. Many times vendors scam people by shitty GPUs with lots of VRAM, I think it's a non issue IF there is enough space for data which then is going to be calculated. However this tells only part of the story, bandwidth is also important and we don't know how that would be gimped.Just 10 GB of RAM? Fuck that shit.
It probably will be sub HD with reconstruction.uuuh---yes?
Have I ever doubted that?
but 12tf for native 4k + rt over 7 years......that`s not gonna work. You don´t have to look further than current pc hardware to see what "next gen" visuals cost in performance.
Both the XSX and the PS5 will have to abandon that render target...and what about the XSS then? Sub 1080p or abandon the visual parity by dialing everything down besides just the resolution.
Who said it has no ssd ? It has identical hard drive as xsxif this is priced around 150 - 199 I might pick one up, but considering it has no ssd built-in i'm guessing it might require 1 of those custom ssd expansion cards:
![]()
It all comes down to the price of this and if this costs $150 and the xss is $200 that's $350, if the xss is anything more than $199 then whats the point ? ideally that ssd storage should be $50 (for 512GB) and the console $150 at that price point I will bite and get one just to play some of the xbox exclusives.
Of course.Is the xsx gonna be expensive next to the xss?
I meant at 600 to 700 bucks price range.Of course.
No man haha . There will be 200 250 price difference.I meant at 600 to 700 bucks price range.
Expansion card slot if it does have one, I don't see why it wouldn't but there are not informations about it.Who said it has no ssd ? It has identical hard drive as xsx
In the XSX hot chips thread, MS denoted the Prices of the XOX and XSX as $+ and $++ respectively, so given the XSX was $499, expect the XSX to be $599 or more.Is the xsx gonna be expensive next to the xss?