As someone who works in editing, that's just insulting. Shape up.
What's insulting? I sincerely doubt she's played most of the games in this second video, meaning she probably didn't use capture equipment.
As someone who works in editing, that's just insulting. Shape up.
She is having a pretty blatant double discurse (Tropes are not bad and you shouldn't feel bad... bud the next cherry picked examples and images will shock your children and will make you feel bad) that seem to want to make you to take a side and not having an actual disscusion.
What's insulting? I sincerely doubt she's played most of the games in this second video, meaning she probably didn't use capture equipment.
Because it isn't 'her books'. It's money donated towards the analysis of a topic. If she cares about truly analyzing this topic, she would spend the money bettering her analysis, or give it back. It isn't conceptually difficult to grasp, so I have no idea why it's beyond you.
But feminism is not the subject of Sarkeesian's work. I must be missing something. Her feminism is informing her critique. Her point of view is informing her critique. That is the whole point of criticism (well, of many schools of critical theory anyway).
Tetra is "mentally incapable" of not being a complete brat, confirmed by statistics. Give me a break.
All you've confirmed is that you're unbelievably stubborn, and simply refuse to concede a single point, even when you're blatantly wrong.
Right. Tetra didn't cease to exist. Actually Zelda did. Literally the exact opposite of what you were trying to pass off here.
Wouldn't be surprised if there was a 4th video, given the order of events.
I know this episode has been a little bit grim, but please join me next time for the 3rd and final installment covering the Damsel in Distress where well take a look at some titles that attempt to flip the script on the damsel and then well go on a quest to find some examples of the elusive dude in distress role reversal.
Because it isn't 'her books'. It's money donated towards the analysis of a topic. If she cares about truly analyzing this topic, she would spend the money bettering her analysis, or give it back. It isn't conceptually difficult to grasp, so I have no idea why it's beyond you.
Have you ever read youtube comments? Because I have and they are full of trollish, immature, dumb comment some even are personal attack on the person, so really how can you have a debate when the people commenting aren't mature enough to do it?
Granted she could block and remove the comment but that alone is a time consuming task.
Fine, then criticize her because her work doesn't reflect the $26000, but that's it. I agree that more money could help fund the project, but that's her call, not ours. What she wants to do with the rest is up to her entirely. It doesn't make her selfish, doesn't make her less capable, doesn't tell anything other than the fact that she took money she didn't ask for, but people gave it to her anyway.Deciding to keep it is massively telling, then. Did she, at any point, ask people to stop donating? If her goal was to truly do analysis on a subject, and she felt $6000 was sufficient, she would have donated anything exceeding that. She did have eternal stretch goals, at least going to $26,000 , so she clearly wasn't opposed to using the excess money. I think that this excess money should be used on furthering the core project, providing alternative views, or being donated to charity. I believe that, as a subject, introspective analysis like this isn't constructive.
Yes it is, and you won't be able to refute it.The hardest truth of all.
Games are not art, get over it.
Honestly all this social "warrior" bs needs to leave games
Games aren't art, it's really not that serious.
Link is weaker too. He's a scared kid who has to sneak around for the first time ever in the series.Tetra becomes the exact same character Zelda always is - in fact, she's weaker as Zelda than she was in OoT. It's a step backwards.
Right.Yeah, Tetra's back alright.
That's exactly what I said. Feminism can't be the subject of someone's work. It's merely a point of view, which a poster early objected to.
So people can't claim that feminism can be held to rigor and analysis when feminism itself is just a point of view. It will just be a trivial analysis.
That's exactly what I said. Feminism can't be the subject of someone's work. It's merely a point of view, which a poster early objected to.
So people can't claim that feminism can be held to rigor and analysis when feminism itself is just a point of view. It will just be a trivial analysis.
You do realize she has 7 or 8 people working with her right?
You do know how stuff like this is made, don't you? It's not just her.
I asked you before, and you didn't reply.
You're not an academic, are you? Your misunderstanding of how analytical frames operate is telling.
Seven or eight? I take back the disclaimer of my previous post, Extra Credits' output makes an absolute mockery out of FremFreq's quantity of videos released.
Link is weaker too. He's a scared kid who has to sneak around for the first time ever in the series.
I was an academic. Graduated from a four year university in 2007.
That's exactly what I said. Feminism can't be the subject of someone's work. It's merely a point of view, which a poster early objected to.
So people can't claim that feminism can be held to rigor and analysis when feminism itself is just a point of view. It will just be a trivial analysis.
Link is weaker too. He's a scared kid who has to sneak around for the first time ever in the series.
Right.
You do realize she has 7 or 8 people working with her right?
You do know how stuff like this is made, don't you? It's not just her.
Tetra is stronger than Zelda in OoT because she's a pirate. She went from being more capable than OoT Zelda, to being less so.
Link went from being weaker than OoT Link, to the same strength. One took a step backwards, one took a step forward.
Tetra is stronger than Zelda in OoT because she's a pirate. She went from being more capable than OoT Zelda, to being less so.
Link went from being weaker than OoT Link, to the same strength. One took a step backwards, one took a step forward.
I wasn't accusing you of that, I was attempting to explain why many people don't call her out on the stuff you pointed out. They want to distance themselves from the people who spammed 'edgy' bullshit so they don't criticize her at all, when her videos are full of flawed points.Oh - I in no way endorse the way she was treated at the hands of 4chan, or Reddit. That was horrible, despicable, and she didn't do anything to deserve a single second of it. It was, however, her greatest contribution to academic critique - her actual content may be nonsense, but she created a living, reactive illustration of the torrent of misogyny that runs beneath the surface of the gaming community. Which wasn't her mission, but which was a fascinating and depressing display nonetheless.
Well that's the point right? Not to have a discussion with her? The point is to put all the "evidence" on the table so we can come together and discuss what makes sense, what doesn't, if it'll ever change, and how it can change for the better.
Because THAT'S the point of these videos, to build discussions whether you agree or not. Think she's full of shit? Say why, articulate it, don't just say "LOL FEMINISMS DUMB! WHAT A DUMB BITCH", which is what happens when youtube comments are on.
The point is that we're talking about this stuff at all, because we normally don't. Ever.
She is doing such a bad job at these videos I wonder if she is purposefully playing the part of the feminist trope.
How is she weaker? She was never strong enough to go head to head with Ganon by herself. That's why she was hiding her identity.
We're so deep into small details that you'd need a microscope to find the sexism in this game.
No, no. You misunderstand. I didn't ask you if you were a student.
I asked you if you were an academic. You don't really need me to explain the difference between those two things, do you?
I'm sorry, I am trying to find where exactly you specifically mentioned this new allowance for certain types of violence but not over the top violence in the specific post of yours that I quoted and responded to.
Oh wait, that was your original post, as can be seen by my direct quote of it HERE. This following quote is the same post with your new additions.
So now you respond as if my response to your post ignored the "ever-more-extreme " aspect to violence, instead of just "violence" itself, as your unedited post specifically listed. Way to move the goalposts. This convenient editing of yours and the complete lack of effort on your part to acknowledge it or leave it alone and suffer some slings and arrows of outrageous, but well-deserved, fortune until you can rectify it in a following post SEEMS just a tad bit disingenuous on your part.
My issue was clearly your APPARENT position against violence in its entirety that I took from your own original comments. Now you want a more subtle and refined position that allows for violence, but not extreme over the top violence. I would not have objected to your comment or responded to it had it actually been this new position originally.
Originally Posted by redcrayon:
I also think it would have been worth exploring the point that perhaps it's not really about treatment of women at all, but that lots of AAA games use violence as their primary problem-solving mechanic full stop. It gives an easy win/loss scenario, health allows for degrees of loss, and conflict breeds drama. It's just a shame we aren't really moved past the kill-or-be-killed stage of conflict resolution that appeals to teenagers.
So did this team play a bunch of games and go through a writing process and how to present stuff? Do they use capture equipment and record moments in games that get their assertion across?
I have no clue how she produces this series, a smaller scope would definitely help contextually and debate wise.
Eh... I didn't say that... like at all.
No they aren't.I would like to hear your definition of an academic. Since students are generally included in the noun.
You have to be a white knight in order to be interested in a feminist analysis of something?Is this GAF's official "white knight" thread?
Ah, I see.ICO-
"An easy way for writers to trigger an emotional reaction in male players" *shuts the video off right here* Way to miss the whole point of that game.
I think I had about enough of this- this-... person
Get off your high horse. You're not some female holier than thou white knight for women.
ICO-
"An easy way for writers to trigger an emotional reaction in male players" *shuts the video off right here* Way to miss the whole point of that game.
I think I had about enough of this- this-... person
Get off your high horse. You're not some female holier than thou white knight for women.
I would like to hear your definition of an academic. Since students are generally included in the noun.
Whatever point you were trying to make is being somewhat lost with your apparent efforts to give him the high hat.No, no. You misunderstand. I didn't ask you if you were a student.
I asked you if you were an academic. You don't really need me to explain the difference between those two things, do you?
No, no. You misunderstand. I didn't ask you if you were a student.
I asked you if you were an academic. You don't really need me to explain the difference between those two things, do you?
Now THAT i'll agree with. Scheduling wise, even with just two videos out, this project is a travesty.
It's more like whatever the opposite of a white knight thread is. Black knight thread?Is this GAF's official "white knight" thread?
Whatever point you were trying to make is being somewhat lost with your apparent efforts to give him the high hat.
I actually think WW Link is much stronger than OoT Link.
OoT Link is just a mindless drone, WW Link is a kid with feelings. It takes real strength of character / courage to do what he does.