• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Twitch bans Adults Only games

Alavard

Member
I'm fine with this in the sense that they were previously working on an ad-hoc basis for banning games. Now, there's a clear distinction between the games that will be allowed and those that won't.
 
I don't think I've ever seen the AO version of GTA SA streamed. Isn't the AO just because the glitch is possible and nothing else?
it is, which means any current version of the game should be considered M rated as it is hot coffee free anyway.
The AO rating seems very theoretical in this case.
 
It doesn't. Hatred doesn't matter at all and anyone insisting it does is just stirring the pot.

Your statement is inherently false, because if it truly didn't matter, then Twitch would have no reason to ban it and other AO games from their service, and we wouldn't be discussing this.

I think you meant it doesn't matter to you at all.
 
A pretty blatant Hatred ban, since their "no explicit sexual scenes" rule covers pretty much all other AO-rated games. I suppose it also gives them something to point to if someone wants to stream, say, Ladykiller In A Bind in the future (although, again, covered by the existing "no explicit sexual scenes" rule).
 

FyreWulff

Member
guys i wonder if there's a large event coming up

one with consoles involved

consoles with companies that would want Twitch to block AO games since they don't allow AO games on their consoles and also have a Twitch app

maybe this event would be big enough to announce a big Twitch push on console hardware

and they should hold it in LA


nah, it's totally to block one small indie game that isn't even ESRB rated and isn't even affected by this ban
 
Your statement is inherently false, because if it truly didn't matter, then Twitch would have no reason to ban it and other AO games from their service, and we wouldn't be discussing this.

I think you meant it doesn't matter to you at all.

Hatred isn't banned. It isn't an AO game and it isn't specifically listed in the language in the article.
 

Stiler

Member
Why not simply have age gates that people have to go through for AO games, wouldn't they clear them of legal issues? So the person watching knows what it's waited and it's their choice.
 
Why not simply have age gates that people have to go through for AO games, wouldn't they clear them of legal issues? So the person watching knows what it's waited and it's their choice.

Same reason YouTube doesn't have age gates to watch porn, or GAF doesnt have age gates for "Adults Only" sub forums.
 
What?

Hatred is indeed rated AO, check the steam page.

1uvufGO.jpg

dunno
 

FyreWulff

Member
What?

Hatred is indeed rated AO, check the steam page.

Nope. Developers can set the ESRB rating on their own on the Steam page.

If you go to esrb.org and search the game, it does not have a rating. It would have a rating by now on their website.

it's a marketing ploy
 

Stiler

Member
Same reason YouTube doesn't have age gates to watch porn, or GAF doesnt have age gates for "Adults Only" sub forums.

Yes but it's more equivalent to R vs NC-17, as far as the games mentioned go (GTA: SA, Indigo Prophecy (aka Fahrenheit).

I mean literally these games, if re-released today would get an M rating easily, GTA IV had full frontal nudity and it was rated M, The Witcher 2 had nudity during scenes (Easily surpassing what was shown in the non rated version of Indigo prophecy) and it was rated M.

They could EASILY separate rated AO games from "pornographic" games.

Hatred
Manhunt
GTA: SA
Indigo Prophecy: DC
etc are not rated AO for porn, unlike the other games that (obviously) they wouldn't want to show the same as Wal mart doesn't sell porn, yet they still sell "unrated" and other movies.
 

Cleve

Member
Why is there such a big discussion about this? There hasn't been a single AO game of note other than Manhunt, and the brief window San Andreas got slappped with one for content that wasn't even in the game, and those were like 10+ years ago.

It seems like they're setting a policy just so they can say they have one.
 
I saw it before that, but her zipping up even further proves the point that there's nothing wrong with that stream.

As far as I've seen, nope, no problems. It's a woman with a reasonable shirt that shows some cleavage.

But stuff like that pic from earlier in the thread? Ridiculous.
 
Damn, I forgot about Hatred. Curious to see if it gets reviewed anywhere or gets any press.

Pretty much guaranteed to get press. Hell, it was the press that made it a thing in the first place. Hatred is the worst case of Dragon's Crowning since, well, Dragon's Crown (and I'd argue it's actually worse since Hatred frankly looks like a bad video game).

Why is there such a big discussion about this? There hasn't been a single AO game of note other than Manhunt, and the brief window San Andreas got slappped with one for content that wasn't even in the game, and those were like 10+ years ago.

It seems like they're setting a policy just so they can say they have one.

Hatred's allegedly out next week. Pretty blatant that's the reason for the new policy.
 

tengiants

Member
LOL at people thinking twitch is some open platform that shouldn't be moderated.

This is very reasonable.

Exactly. I'm against censorship on platforms that advertise themselves as open, but twitch does not. They are business and they should be able to control their business as they see fit.
 
Obviously it won't, but I'd laugh if Hatred isn't mentioned because it somehow only wound up being rated M.

Pretty much guaranteed to get press. Hell, it was the press that made it a thing in the first place. Hatred is the worst case of Dragon's Crowning since, well, Dragon's Crown (and I'd argue it's actually worse since Hatred frankly looks like a bad video game).
Sites still covered mostly Dragon's Crown at least, just there was more of an emphasis on LOOK AT THESE GIANT TITS IN SHAME. If it were my call I'd just do the bare basics of covering Hatred and leave it at that; remove the mystique but not really pimping it out either.
 

Averon

Member
Hatred should have been a small, obscure footnote. It has gotten 100 times the attention it deserves. But controversy sells, and its developers are clearly using that to great effect.
 
Hatred should have been a small, obscure footnote. It has gotten 100 times the attention it deserves. But controversy sells, and its developers are clearly using that to great effect.

Sounds like Postal.

The developers got three games and a movie out of that franchise.
 

Northeastmonk

Gold Member
Hatred should have been a small, obscure footnote. It has gotten 100 times the attention it deserves. But controversy sells, and its developers are clearly using that to great effect.

I don't think controversy does well anymore. Everyone wants to fight it before the idea is even imagined or created. Film festivals get away with much more and it's enjoyed to say the least. A banned film has much more ground to it then if say a developer pulls their game or patches it.

Not that R rated movies don't get cut

I'm saying there's this discipline we want to give to developers. That's censorship right there.

Sometimes I felt like we were breaking pin ball machines and burning copies because video games all of a sudden were under fire for ethics and all sorts of stuff. Now the services are trying to get involved. Video games suffer because no one respects the ratings board. Even movies that are rated NC17 are 17, which is an M rated game which is nudity and sex.

It's just a mess after a while. It's not like I'll use Twitch for myself in the near future.

I wonder sometimes if it's even going to matter. New talented artist will create a controversy regardless. If we keep pushing creative talent we'll arrive nowhere because no one gets anything out of the same thing after a while. We'll be like a private school with set rules and uniforms.
 

PillarEN

Member
Heavily disagree with this decision by Twitch. Sure, I'm not affected as I don't watch streamers but I don't like the notion of banning certain games because of a rating.
 

Northeastmonk

Gold Member
Oh, I was not aware there was a side-wide ban on the topic.

I hope this thread is able to stay open, because the topic is more about Twitch banning AO games rather than Hatred's content.

AO games is nothing but censorship. Adult centered games haven't really been groundbreaking. I've heard it been compared to a death sentence before. Rockstar has quality to their work and it wasn't right that they got an AO rating.

Hentai, Loli, etc are all just dark corners of gaming that have never really shined through. You aren't dealing with an expert panel with AO being brought up. It's been known for many MANY years.

Hatred is just another shooter bent on scoring points with controversy. It isn't like it's hurting anyone. It's just a product that's being sold. Some one could very well enjoy it for all I know.

hatred could very well score an 8 or a 9. It's just people are looking at the game's aesthetics and they're backing off. The studio, like many, has done their job already.

Eminen started off doing the same thing. Criticizing censors and just saying what he felt. He ended up being incredibly popular, rich, and continues to make music.

There's probably manga and games that could get people into trouble. It's a giant mess. You can watch digital nudity and portions of sex at 17, but what's so big about being 18 for porn? You have kids watching digital nudity because their parents bought them a game. Then you ban AO because that whole area sucks? There's a lot to consider about this whole thing.
 
guys i wonder if there's a large event coming up

one with consoles involved

consoles with companies that would want Twitch to block AO games since they don't allow AO games on their consoles and also have a Twitch app

maybe this event would be big enough to announce a big Twitch push on console hardware

and they should hold it in LA


nah, it's totally to block one small indie game that isn't even ESRB rated and isn't even affected by this ban

That seems logical. But Pathfinder followed the money! It's clearly "agenda-driven", Twitch is out to get only Hatred. Pathfinder just really really doesn't like that Twitch is being sneaky about this "agenda".

That's not the point here.

The point is this announcement is coincidentally coming very close to the release of Hatred. So basically, Twitch is saying you can't stream Hatred without actually saying you can't stream Hatred.

It's not their choice not to allow it that bothers me the most. It's how they're being sneaky with it and trying to pretend its for the greater good.

We shall see what happens next week.

And what curious timing to be making an extremely public and official announcement such as this... hmm...

You're being purposefully obtuse if you are ignoring the notion that this could potentially be completely agenda-driven.

agendas! he said the secret word!

ZWARaOZ.gif

Which is exactly a point I made earlier in the thread.

I just feel like Twitch should be more up front and honest about their want to not have Hatred on their streaming service, and not try to sugar coat it. They should stick to their convictions.

Your statement is inherently false, because if it truly didn't matter, then Twitch would have no reason to ban it and other AO games from their service, and we wouldn't be discussing this.

I think you meant it doesn't matter to you at all.

Let's see what happens on June 1.

It's not like the first time Twitch has had rules for certain things like, The Playroom back in 2013...

a dress code...

Could just be a chance to re-iterate their rules on AO games just before E3, like they've done before...
 
I honestly already thought this was the case with Twitch. I guess I didn't consider games that get AO for something other than sex.
 
Top Bottom