cireza
Member
Great picks. Last Blade 2 is gorgeous and the arranged soundtrack is phenomenal. Same for the first game.Good graphics to me:
Great picks. Last Blade 2 is gorgeous and the arranged soundtrack is phenomenal. Same for the first game.Good graphics to me:
30fps and a bit blurry. No reason not to have decent hardware running this exact same game at 1080p@60fps.You should also play Kirby The forgotten land, also gorgeous game.
That game is sexy as hell.
Forgot about this one and yeah, definitely a looker.
I personally more impressed by developers who can achieve good visuals even with underpower system.
Luigi's Mansion 3 looks great, but I don't agree with Kirby. It looks very, VERY rough even on my 1080p TV.You should also play Kirby The forgotten land, also gorgeous game.
I personally really liked Kirby's visual design, it looks very attractive to me.Luigi's Mansion 3 looks great, but I don't agree with Kirby. It looks very, VERY rough even on my 1080p TV.
Where are Ori games?
I'll say I don't care TOO much about this to check out each title at its full settings in detail, but Demon's Souls is probably the only game that has REALLY impressed me graphically in a long time.
Luigi's Mansion 3 looks great, but I don't agree with Kirby. It looks very, VERY rough even on my 1080p TV.
DF released a video today on this exact topic. You would be surprised, they had it running at 1080p 30fps on a 3050. That's like a $270 card.Cyberpunk is basically a next gen game, maybe even beyond that, in terms of RT, so for me that's just a pointless option. It can only properly run on a $2k graphics card.
I'm not being argumentative or anything but have you played Demon Souls on PS5?I still don't think DS Remake looks THAT good. It's good looking, but nothing that I don't think couldn't have been done on PS4
It's a good looking game but Santa Monica themselves said that they developed GoW Ragnarok with PS4 as their main focusGoW Ragnarok with .8% votes
Wtf happened to Sony Santa Monica?
DF released a video today on this exact topic. You would be surprised, they had it running at 1080p 30fps on a 3050. That's like a $270 card.
though tbf that is not the best way to play the game in those cards. And without a powerful CPU its pretty much unviable.Not really. You can play it at 1080p 30 fps using dlss on a 3050. Looking at the steam hardware survey, it looks like around 20-25% of the GPUs should be able to run it.
Steam Hardware & Software Survey
store.steampowered.com
Someone released a mod that DF tested which reduced the light bounce from 2 to 1, and it improved performance by 25%. Think of that as medium settings. You are still path tracing the game.
Surprised not more votes for ratchet. some of the scenes esp the disco club etc are like playing a pixar movie almost. it's absurd. artistically it goes to cuphead for me(cant believe I beat that game) the last of us part 1 also had some ridiculous lighting in certain levels. that game doesn't get the respect it deserves visually IMO.
Reinstalling right now
You would, characters and moving objects weren't correctly lit even with psycho RT. Overdrive fixes that, it's a whole different ball game.Cyberpunk raytracing was already pretty good. Overdrive just makes it a bit better, doubt I'd notice it in game.
These days it's harder to tell graphics apart in games, because art style plays a bit more of a role. I think after uncharted 4 I just stopped caring what games look like, as long as they were up to a certain standard. Like new graphical developments matter so much less. PS3 to PS4 graphics jump was exciting. PS4 to PS5 2.5 years alter feels very meh. Most things have been cross gen but even the exclusive stuff has been kinda underwhelming. Unreal 5 seems promising. I'd much rather studios focus on delivering a bug free and functional game than worrying about pushing graphics. Like RTX is more or less meaningless in most games and it's fairly broken half the time.
Not bullshots, not unrepresentative - this is what the game actually looks like.
In 1440p with RT at like 80fps.
In terms of pushing the console hardware, it's peerless.
It's way harder to impress people with cartoony graphics, apparently.
I still maintain it's the best looking yet. HFW is absolutely gorgeous, but it doesn't have that same "CGI" quality to it as R&C. I'm not technical so I can't put my finger on it, but it just doesn't quite feel next gen in the same way. Perhaps I'd say that R&C looks like a PS5 game, whereas Horizon looks like a PS4 game with really, really, REALLY high settings. Which I suppose that's essentially what it is, right?
The thing I find most striking about next gen games so far is how much sharper everything looks, which I presume is down to high res textures, right? HFW looks absolutely pin sharp at 1800cb, but when I booted up RDR2 last night (essentially the Pro version) I couldn't BELIEVE how muddy and low res it looked. It makes way more difference than the actual rendering resolution.
I do not recall, you would have to watch the video for that info.Natively?
Rdr2 has a known issue with its checkerboard rendering on playstation and they never fixed it. Xbox is where you need to play on a console. Wish those guys would patch it for 60 fps. Rockstar is full of shit.
Did she eat a ton of beans and cabbage?Tie between HFW and Cyberpunk Overdrive, but I will pick HFW personally because I prefer its artstyle and atmosphere.
They did a really good job with that one.I personally more impressed by developers who can achieve good visuals even with underpower system.
They did a stellar job making a game with that art style. It's one of the most charming games I've played in a long time.
TLOU II, combination of PBR materials, Motion Matching, attention to the smallest details, (idle animations, muscle flexing etc) the overall package is UNMATCHED. Looks CGI sometimes…
TLOU II, combination of PBR materials, Motion Matching, attention to the smallest details, (idle animations, muscle flexing etc) the overall package is UNMATCHED. Looks CGI sometimes…
The thread is about games that already released.Where is Zelda Totk?