I can't stand the PS3/XB1 and MS/Sony comparisons any longer.
PS3 was designed as a game console with a Bluray player like PS2 was designed as a PS2 as a game console with a DVD player. Marketing it as a Bluray player early was needed to sell some units at initial price at all (and it was not that different from early PS2).
Sony was arrogant, but it was just out of desperation because Cell and Bluray turned out too expensive, especially early (and MS forced them to launch when blue lasers where in low supply). Still PS3 was about games from the start and it recovered because 1st/2nd party studios delivered.
The cheaper SKUs and price drops in general were no 180, they were a deperate and successful move to sell the machine.
I'll be sure to quote you. Anyone who thinks physical media will be dead in 5-7 years is crazy. Digital music sales only recently surpassed cd sales. Internet bandwidth caps exist for most people, and internet speeds are shit for a lot of people. Not a chance in hell.
Exactly, the PS3 was a steal at the time if you wanted a blu-ray player. I got the 20gb model for $499 close to launch and it was worth it as a blu-ray player/games machine. It wasn't because they were trying to fuck over consumers. They wanted to push blu-ray adoption sure. They've always shown respect for gamers. The "get a second job" thing is also always taken out of context.
Decent chance of this happening since the Xbox is very competitive with games. So far sony's slate is good but lacks system sellers.
And what's a system seller for the Xbox? Cause it sure wasn't titanfall
And what's a system seller for the Xbox? Cause it sure wasn't titanfall
I agree.
All of MS's actions seems reactionary to their sales. I wouldn't even say they listened. They only did those 180s because of the poor reaction from the market.
To be fair, Tretton should never have said that. They were miserable in communicating
what their vision for the PS3 was.
Looks like ms lies are working.
When MS did a 180 from their initial DRM policies, they blamed the consumer for not understanding (despite them never even attempting to explain).
When Sony did a 180 from the Driveclub PS+ discount/subscription issue, they apologised to their customers and said it was inapproriate to do that.
So yeah, I don't believe they have made any of their decisions with their customers in the mind at all, merely their bottom line.
are you saying Titanfall isn't the best selling game for two months straight?
Honestly, Sony have got this gen. in the bag. All they have to do is lead or keep
parity with XB1 in NA, while their sales in Europe and Asia widens their total
sales.
Like a poster above said, XB1 would have to pull in Wii like sales to just get ahead.
That's not the definition of "system seller."
Bring out the chalkboard!
That's not the definition of "system seller."
That's not the definition of "system seller."
are you saying Titanfall isn't the best selling game for two months straight?
how do they get to those conclusions? They see what the customer liked and disliked, and make changes. They're not random changes. There are betas and their twitter acount / forums, and people give feedback. Also, reacting to sale numbers is "listening" in company speak.
Bring out the chalkboard!
are you saying Titanfall isn't the best selling game for two months straight?
are you saying Titanfall isn't the best selling game for two months straight?
I'm ashamed to admit that I was happy to see Titanfall not quite live up to the hype. It was marketed as a system-seller in this really weird and because we say so kind of way. Something just got on my nerves about that game's marketing push.And what's a system seller for the Xbox? Cause it sure wasn't titanfall
This doesn't really stand a chance of getting updated until July, I guess.
how do they get to those conclusions? They see what the customer liked and disliked, and make changes. They're not random changes. There are betas and their twitter acount / forums, and people give feedback. Also, reacting to sale numbers is "listening" in company speak.
It was Kutaragi that said it http://www.1up.com/news/ps3-job
Well, I'm sure Titanfall wasn't the best seeling next-gen game for April in North-America.are you saying Titanfall isn't the best selling game for two months straight?
I'd rather they didn't blame the customers because they fucked up.
They must think I'm so selfish for having the sheer gall to expect to actually have ownership of the things that I buy.
Do you own iPhone games though? You will always be able to redownload them and always have access to them. But you can't resell them.
Do you own iPhone games though? You will always be able to redownload them and always have access to them. But you can't resell them.
At least XB1 still has a chalkboard. It's pretty funny how there's not even a Wii U one anymore.This doesn't really stand a chance of getting updated until July, I guess.
are you saying Titanfall isn't the best selling game for two months straight?
To be fair, Tretton should never have said that. They were miserable in communicating
what their vision for the PS3 was.
They also generally cost like $0.99.
look at 2006 and the amount of CDs still being bought, and the internet speeds on average. Look at 2014. then extrapolate that.
No, and if iPhone games cost $60 and the only option for purchasing them was to purchase a license, I would not buy them.Do you own iPhone games though? You will always be able to redownload them and always have access to them. But you can't resell them.
So free TF in the box at $449 and it still lost to the bundle-less MSRP PS4. System seller indeed.
in the first few months of release?
Then what are people playing it on? Are PS4 players just buying the system and not buying games?
Do you own iPhone games though? You will always be able to redownload them and always have access to them. But you can't resell them.
we can speculate all we want but until the system is parity in pricing in June and the public catches on to the price drop, it's hard to compare apples to oranges pricing sales.
So "system seller" just means beating the competition and nothing else?
The term's definition is seemingly getting changed/twisted to fit arguments. The game helped sell Xbox One consoles so I don't see how it isn't a system seller.
If a PS4 exclusive sells less than Titanfall, but the PS4 sold more than the Xbox One during the month of the game's release then it would make that game more of a system seller? That doesn't make much sense to me.
shinobi602 ‏@shinobi602 13m
If what I'm hearing ends up true, I'm pretty goddamn excited for Microsoft's conference.
Shinobi just tweeted that. So looks like MS might have some truly epic stuff. Hope it helps them push sales.
Kinect-less SKU and $399 is on the front page of Amazon games. It has bulleted to the #180 range. If anything this SKU has cemented the idea that MS has no vision and an investment is a risk. The TF bundles has dropped from around #20 to back near #40. People seem less interested in the XB1 than ever. Maybe E3 will make things better.
To be fair and honest, It was, if you combine PC, Xbox One and 360 Sales. However, Infamous SS PS4 sold more copies than Titanfall Xbox One last month. Infamous was the highest selling next gen title in April.
Since this thread is about MS overtaking Sony in NA with next gen consoles (obviously, since 360 beat the PS3 in NA), I assume he meant Xbox One system sellers, considering the thread we are in.
That would push sales only if Sony has a miserable showing in comparison.
Where's China?
Not entirely true they could out price the ps4 but it would mean that would not make any money on the one for quite a while.