• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Rumor : Xbox Lockhart Reveal soon: 4Tf, Limited next gen features

are you excited for Lockhart?

  • yes. lockhart is amazing

    Votes: 82 22.7%
  • Hell Naaa

    Votes: 280 77.3%

  • Total voters
    362

FireFly

Member
A third of the power and you genuinely think that the only difference will be a drop in resolution?
On PC, going from 4K to 1080p gets you around 2.6x more performance, not accounting for games being cpu limited at 1080p.


Moreover in the games Digital Foundry tested, a 4 TF Navi card at 1080p was faster than a 9.2TF 5700 XT at 4K by 28%-66%. And in several of the games the 4TF card was almost level at 1440p.

 
D

Deleted member 775630

Unconfirmed Member
The only difference is third party games is going to be resolution between the consoles. May be RT to some extent ? which will probably be disabled on the 300$ console.
Indeed, and that's the whole idea of this system. People that only have 1080p or even lower tv screens can use this device. Maybe they are even targeting lower developed countries, although then a $300 price target would still be quite high.
 

Psykodad

Banned
Im betting on $449 or lower for PS5, definitely not more than $499.
Lockhart would be in an awkward position if it only costs $50 less than PS5
Releasing Lockhart day 1 will be the dumbest thing for MS to do, exactly for the reasons you mention.

No matter the pricing, if Sony positions PS5 strategically, Lockhart will completely mess up MS' next-gen launch and likely the entire gen again.

Now that would be weird as f***... 4TF vs 12TF, that's a big ASS performance diff. you need something in between

Ps5. 😶
 
Last edited:

jonnyp

Member
Now that would be weird as f***... 4TF vs 12TF, that's a big ASS performance diff. you need something in between

No it isn't. Lockhart only makes sense if they discontinue the One X. Lockhart should be more than capable of running every Xbox One game as well as a One X and will run also support next gen games.
 

joe_zazen

Member
I really don't see the need for it.
Yes, the GPU could be reduced and therefore resolution/details can be reduced (the easy way) until it runs well (that is the easy part). But I really don't see how they would reduce costs so far that the price could make a real difference.
In best case, if we reduce the GPU, we might get a $30-$40 lower SOC price. CPU should be untouched, else it would make it harder for developers to adapt to that.
They can't strip out the SSD at best they could use a bit slower SSD (because smaller assets are used) but that wouldn't change the price much.

They can strip out the BR-drive and again make a digital only console, but that would be at best another $30 (digital only xb1 wasn't that much cheaper).

But on the other had, with a lower end GPU, they also can't really use the RT-hardware (because you need at least a decent enough chip to use it) so developers can't even rely on that.
Memory might be reduced to by one or two gigs. Maybe that is why the xbox one x has such a strange interface.

It only makes sense if they want a replacement for the xbox one x like a xbox one x "mini". They did something similar when the xbox one was released. They introduces an even smaler xbox 360 in xbox one design.

three areas where they can save money are apu, memory, hdd/ssd. What price they are aiming for will dictate how much they strip out. They need the drive because cost conscious people will want used games, especially super cheap x1 games.

my guess is 256 ssd, 8gb ram, 4 tf apu and a $199 price point.
 

Fun Fanboy

Banned
People throughout the thread have been discussing the merit of having a machine like this and its implications throughout the generation. It's not just about whether people will buy it or not, the poll speaks for itself. The reality is that I doubt you will be buying one either.

If you're incapable of having an adult discussion about it without throwing your toys out the pram then that's fine.
A poll on GAF on Xbox? yeah. I'd trust that poll on what people want from Xbox.

Again. XSX games won't be hampered by Lockhart. Just like CPU games aren't shit because of my low powered PC. It's really easy.

Curious. Are you an Xbox fan? Are you buying the console? The series X? Because either way. There's nothing to worry about. The games won't be messed up because of base models. Just like games for the Pro and 1X weren't messed up.
 

Thirty7ven

Banned
It won't be $300, though. Or if it is, they'd be selling it at around a $50-$60 loss, at the least. And why lose money per system sold on both Lockhart and XSX, unless they intend to sell XSX at-profit?

Business wise that’s what makes sense. Why is this “scary”? I don’t get it.
 
Last edited:
So there is literally no point in buying "Lockhart" aside from the aspect that you may be able to play your Xbox One X Games on it?

For me: I dont buy Lockheart when i can just save up money for one more month to buy the better console.

They could do it like this:

Lockhart 399
One X 499
SEX 599

But if you buy Lockhart first and you buy SEX within two years you just pay 299 for the upgrade.

EWI6nkwWoAgz380
 
Last edited:

Xellos

Member
I'm pulling for Lockhart pretty hard because I want video games to be more affordable. Not everyone wants to (or can) spend $500 on a console. $300-$350 for next gen games at 1080p with lower quality textures/shadows would be a good value. Matching frame rate, up to 60fps, is most important.

Price needs to be right, though. $150 difference from PS5/XSX at minimum.
 
On PC, going from 4K to 1080p gets you around 2.6x more performance, not accounting for games being cpu limited at 1080p.


Moreover in the games Digital Foundry tested, a 4 TF Navi card at 1080p was faster than a 9.2TF 5700 XT at 4K by 28%-66%. And in several of the games the 4TF card was almost level at 1440p.


5700 xt is weaker than next gen consoles and its rdna1 which has lower performance than ps5 and xsx. Also there is no mandate fir a dev to hit native 4k on ps5 or xsx. They can easily aim for 1600p on xsx and 1500p on ps5. In that case lockhart has to hit 720p. Which is still fine imo
 

Joho79

Member
Wow, so many people hate lockhart.

As a Sony fan, I am not one of them.

I am 100% in favour of getting a ps5 this generation and will be looking to get that day one. However, If Microsoft can offer me a cheap system, to play Grim dawn, Ori fable and halo i am all in on it.
If those games are 60 fps at 1080 i will be extremely happy.

My main system will with out a doubt be Ps5, they will just have superior games, but Ms will have some very decent offerings this time round, i really would like to get both with out having to break the bank.
Im with you 100%. I will most probably get an series X but if Sony released a cheaper machine I would get that for the few exclusives I would want.
 

FireFly

Member
5700 xt is weaker than next gen consoles and its rdna1 which has lower performance than ps5 and xsx. Also there is no mandate fir a dev to hit native 4k on ps5 or xsx. They can easily aim for 1600p on xsx and 1500p on ps5. In that case lockhart has to hit 720p. Which is still fine imo
Sure, but that doesn't mean the performance scaling from 4K to 1080p will be massively different, since Lockhart will also be using RDNA2.
 

geordiemp

Member
Where is that from ? Ms is not gonna charge 400$ for a 4tf console .thats bullshit

Not if Ps5 is $500 and XSX is $600 which is my guess.

Ps5 is not too different costs to XSX just approx 16 less CU

Lockart is 16 less CU than Ps5 maybe, less RAM maybe,. It needs same SSD and CPU and drive (as low cost buys need physical).

It will be interesting, as assembly, shipping, retail and so many items are the similar.....
 
Last edited:

THEAP99

Banned
If Lockhart is true, I expect it to be where Microsoft focuses next generation on. No doubt in my mind the Series X is a more niche premium thing for them. This will be what they try to mass-market and what will get the most support from them.
 
If Lockhart is true, I expect it to be where Microsoft focuses next generation on. No doubt in my mind the Series X is a more niche premium thing for them. This will be what they try to mass-market and what will get the most support from them.
Well ofcourse just like now ps4 and x1 are main focus and pro and 1x are higher resolution higher frame machines
 

SegaShack

Member
MS, just cancel Lockhart. It's redundant. There's no genuine purpose for it. XSX and Xcloud are enough. If people want to get in on next-gen cheaply, literally just let them use Xcloud streaming on their One X/XBO or Samsung phone.

Just focus on XSX and price it right, because the more I hear about Lockhart (especially in light of the already great Xcloud and Gamepass services), the more I dislike it. The whole thing is feeling like a stopgap and a constant road bump to a smooth next-gen with XSX, Xcloud and Gamepass.

Hearing it could have critical next-gen features cut back just makes it sound even worst. Put that Lockhart production budget towards XSX, more software development or securing 3rd-party deals (or even a VR/AR headset). All of those would be better use of that Lockhart money, IMHO.



But that's the thing; GPU isn't just for graphics. Asynchronous compute will be a massive thing for next gen, arguably more than the SSDs IMHO, and while non-graphical features of games are very scalable these days, there's a point to where you scale down so much it becomes a completely different gaming experience.

Just my opinion, but the whole thing with Lockhart feels very 32X-ish. A potential long-term anchor solution for a short-term problem (recession and casuals not able or willing to jump in @$450/$500). It just feels redundant now thanks to stuff like Xcloud streaming.

Maybe the ONLY way I could see Lockhart being justified is IF it's a streaming device, perhaps they could get it to $199. In that case, I can see it being of some value and not have any big impacts on XSX. But you don't need 4TF for a streaming device IMO....not even for 4K60 I would assume.
This is silly. Microsoft is genius for having an entry level next gen console as well as a standard one. Most people aren't dying to drop 600 bucks on a new game machine.
 

geordiemp

Member
This makes the most sense

Why would you clock lower on a smaller APU that generates less heat ?

CPU and GPU will clock the same on Lockart as XSX as a minimum for sure, and to make development of games easier it would make sense to have them the same clocks, especially the CPU. So 3.6 / 3.8 Ghz.
 

Thirty7ven

Banned
This is silly. Microsoft is genius for having an entry level next gen console as well as a standard one. Most people aren't dying to drop 600 bucks on a new game machine.

There’s nothing genius about it. It’s a necessity. They wouldn’t be able to compete otherwise.
 
Last edited:

DaGwaphics

Member
Why would you clock lower on a smaller APU that generates less heat ?

CPU and GPU will clock the same on Lockart as XSX as a minimum for sure, and to make development of games easier it would make sense to have them the same clocks, especially the CPU. So 3.6 / 3.8 Ghz.

I would generally agree, but in what WC mentioned about Lockhart (they haven't been wrong on much so far) was that the CPU was down-clocked slightly. 3.8 > 3.2 is only 12% so it depends on what they consider slight. PC benchmarks do show some CPU overhead for 4k, so that might play into things.

I'm not buying Lockhart is a 4TF console, my guesses :
between 5/6TF at 349$
PS5 449/499$
XBSX 499$

I've seen those higher TF estimates. They've done a better job keeping this system under wraps than XSX. LOL
 
Last edited:
+ Same cpu, same architecture, same ssd, ram

- mid-range gpu, less storage, less bandwidth maybe?

With AI upscaling making incredible strides already today, I can see this 1080p console being a great choice for many.

299 at launch.
 

Snake29

RSI Employee of the Year
I can see Series S doing it way better then Series X. But having just 1 console (PS5) can make you more visible for the people.
 

SegaShack

Member
There’s nothing genius about it. It’s a necessity. They wouldn’t be able to compete otherwise.
When you consider how consumers come from all different types of economic backgrounds and have different levels of fandom, this is genius. They don't have to justify to the average person why their console is worth 600 dollars, its a low barrier for entry for anyone interested.

For the enthusiasts there will be the X, and as much as people "on the internet" will disagree, the majority of people buying game systems don't care about Teraflops or know what they are. They want to play the newest games and that's all.
 

GHG

Gold Member
A poll on GAF on Xbox? yeah. I'd trust that poll on what people want from Xbox.

Again. XSX games won't be hampered by Lockhart. Just like CPU games aren't shit because of my low powered PC. It's really easy.

Curious. Are you an Xbox fan? Are you buying the console? The series X? Because either way. There's nothing to worry about. The games won't be messed up because of base models. Just like games for the Pro and 1X weren't messed up.

Yeh, a poll on GAF, a forum full of gamers who are Microsoft's potential customers. A forum full of people Microsoft need to convince if they want to start gaining market share. And no, everyone is not just a "hater".

I'm an Xbox customer and I don't need to be a certified "fan" to have an opinion and voice my thoughts on something that will definitely have implications on future games that I will play (1st party games) and potential implications industry wide (3rd party games).

The base models are what developers build and make game design decisions around, this has always been the case.
 

Jtibh

Banned
I love the comments here.

4tf console will do raytracing but a 10 teraflop console will suffer.

And at 299 who will buy if xbox x is already 299 at 6 tflops
Or 4tf rdna2 is more than 6tf gcn but then who will buy the xbox x for 299 when i can have the lockhart that does more for same price?

Price will be 399 xbox series x will be 599 and i also expect ps5 to be at 599.

Once the market gets back to normal we may see a price drop.

I tell you it was easier to pick a console in 95 between saturn 3do jaguar playstation 32x erc than it is now.
 
I know others have said and are thinking this but.... Yesterday the line from most Microsoft fans was that a Teraflop is a Teraflop is a Teraflop
and nothing else can bottleneck the teraflop and the teraflop is king basically. Now we see a possibility of a 4TF (Really??) console and
I am hearing nothing but that it has secret sauce to break an xbox one X in performance despite being 4tf vs 6.

I get the CPU THING- I agree. I dont know where the CPU will be clocked maybe its equal to the series X? Would sure make up for
a ton of the difference in GPU making games unplayable would basically limit the machine to 1080P though running games meant
to run on a 12tf GPU at 4k... maybe thats its market.... If you ask me the system is going to have a 500gb SSD and thats
where the sacrifice was made - on the GPU power because the real bottleneck last generation was the CPU and storage?
or because its intended to run at a lower resolution and the rest of the hardware is comparable minus maybe some storage space
(is expandable anyway) and so is going to offer a very similar experience just scaled down. 4tf VS 12 only makes sense for running the
same game if the way it runs them is on a totally different level like that.

This isnt meant to troll, I just hope that maybe people calm down with the teraflop stuff until we see some games.

Since TFLOPS are being thrown around so much, and used as a unit of measure, as a guy with an Xbox one X thinking that a 4TF xbox
is going to get the newer games and my 6TF existing system wont.... dammit.

But didnt microsoft also say the first year wont see any exclusives that arent also on the Xbox one? I think that was what they said and
if thats true theres no reason to hold back on buying an X right now - In fact they may close them out for a nice price. Worth it just for
the existing library if you get it cheap.
 

Thirty7ven

Banned
Obviously MS will need this model to sell well, they won’t be able to just half ass it. From the moment they put it on the market, it will become their main SKU in terms of reaching out to gamers.

If it fails to attract a wider audience it will have been a terrible move for the brand, devaluing it greatly in the process. But I don’t think there’s another way.
 
Last edited:

DaGwaphics

Member
And at 299 who will buy if xbox x is already 299 at 6 tflops
Or 4tf rdna2 is more than 6tf gcn but then who will buy the xbox x for 299 when i can have the lockhart that does more for same price?

If lockhart exists, 1X is dead. Easy, no choice, the units won't be on shelves together.
 

Fun Fanboy

Banned
Yeh, a poll on GAF, a forum full of gamers who are Microsoft's potential customers. A forum full of people Microsoft need to convince if they want to start gaining market share. And no, everyone is not just a "hater".

I'm an Xbox customer and I don't need to be a certified "fan" to have an opinion and voice my thoughts on something that will definitely have implications on future games that I will play (1st party games) and potential implications industry wide (3rd party games).

The base models are what developers build and make game design decisions around, this has always been the case.
They don't need to convince anyone on this site. I don't think you have to be a fan to have an opinion.

I guess devs are making for the base PS5 then and screwing XSX users. Oh great!
 

SegaShack

Member
I respect your opinion. I think it'll be around 20% after it flatens out.

I respect your opinion as well. I think it's important to look at Xbox 360 Pro and Core/Arcade. While no numbers exist to differentiate them, I know from personal interactions with friends in retail that it seemed like Core was easily the better selling version.
 

Grinchy

Banned
Not entirely true. We see stuff like Forza Horizon 4, where X was the lead platform, and there’s very different visual settings and features between the platforms.

Likewise, we can expand this analogy to the PC, which such scalability is a fact of life... and just about every modern game comes to that platform, and deals with it just fine.

So let me just ask you and anyone who wanted to answer a simple question:

If there was only a 6TF Xbox One X for this entire generation, would Forza Horizon 4, Gears 5, Halo 5, ect, all look exactly as they do now? Or would they be much more advanced?

If you feel that they'd actually be technically superior because of the fact that they were made for a high-end 6TF X and didn't have to run on anything else, then you have to also agree that having only a 12TF XSX would do the same.

If you feel that the games would look exactly the same as they do now because that's the max you can get out of the X because everything is being made for it first and "downscaled" for the regular Xbox One, then MS PR is incredible at what they do and you've been drinking the Kool-Aid.
 

Neo_game

Member
Yes Res and RT and maybe some other things like a lot more shaders optimization on SX. But the lead platform will be SX. not Series S.

The devkit is one dev console for XSX and XSS with switching option dev told me. So the devkit we have see in DF video is also the devkit of Lockhart

And don't forget xCloud is integrated into the hardware.

So you can play your games instantly in XBOX, without waiting for the download or anything (if you use xCloud ofc). That also next gen features.

And also Project acoustic in both hardware (tempest engine like)

Devs target the lowest common denominator as it is easy for them to simply increase the resolution and can enable RT to use more power console.
 

GHG

Gold Member
They don't need to convince anyone on this site. I don't think you have to be a fan to have an opinion.

I guess devs are making for the base PS5 then and screwing XSX users. Oh great!

I've literally already said this:

In an ideal world the PS5 is the weakest "next gen" console that needs to be accounted for and then it's just a 20% weaker console potentially holding the show up and not a 200% weaker one.

Contrary to what you think they do need to convince people on this site and it's not just this site either.
 
Last edited:

BeardGawd

Banned
What I'm expecting performance wise:

Series X: 4k60/120, Ray tracing
Series S (same CPU and SSD): 1080p60/120, Ray tracing
One X: Dynamic 1080p30, No Ray tracing
One S: Dynamic 720p30, No Ray tracing
 
Exciting news in terms of the pricepoint and the fact that I am stuck at home, so any news is exciting. I just do not think that the Xbox brand is strong enough to carry a lower pricepoint console. They also do not have the big exclusives and I just think this is going to confuse people.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom