They used it because they saw no need to change it.
this then would be even worst seeing the xsx seem to have the same if not better perf
I'd say most of Team Sony thinks that, easily. They think the secret Cerny sauce makes it way better than XSX.
O.k, I guess....
They said setup, not settings.
and did you believe it? the ps5 renders the game at a lower resolution with the same performance as the xsx.
Still not the case if thats the case then it means the higher resolution reconstruction on ps5 has advantages that series x doesnt, but i strongly feel that this is more about texture quality
i was talking about the perf mode. Why the perfomance are the same when the ps5 utilize internally a much lower res
dlss is not like cb....dlss 1.0 was exactly like CB, a case by case implementation.
They are all upscaling and reconstruction techniques, that work using different methods to reach the final image and they all suffer from artefacts and some are better than others even digital foundry showed reconstructed 1440p with dlss can appear sharper than native 4k in some instances
It should be accepted to some degree, the dev enviroment being ”behind” on the Xbox consoles was talked about before the consoles even launched. Now I dont believe we will see some magical performance gain that will put the Series X leagues above PS5. I think it primarily will resolve the stutter issues seen in some games and maybe resolve some of the pretty minor issues we have seen when the Series consoles display effect heavy scenes for example. Most of all i think it will simply relieve some headache from developers that have expressed it not being as easy to work with as the PS5 counterpart. I think there is some kernel of truth to both these claims, but i dont think Series X/PS5 will perform much different in the end except in cases where the engine favor the fast/narrow vs slow/wide design.
In this particular game? Or do you mean overall?
This isnt the case that blur isnt just depth of field anybody with an intellect in graphics can notice that, even in other areas without depth of field the textures are still of higher quality than ps5, for instance there is no depth of field here but look at those rocks at the background!
in this game when CB is in action
Where did you find this screenshot? Is it in the video?This isnt the case that blur isnt just depth of field anybody with an intellect in graphics can notice that, even in other areas without depth of field the textures are still of higher quality than ps5, for instance there is no depth of field here but look at those rocks at the background!
There's really nothing special about the console hardware other than the SSD. They are all AMD boards. I'm sure their graphics engine uses DX12/Vulkan with general libraries that would work on any platform with DX12/Vulkan drivers.
Name one multiplat game from last gen that is "well optimized" and outperforms the PC version or has more features than the PC version.
Well, its not a 1-1 comprison first of all due to the CBR on PS5. Alex says that Series X exhibits ”a sligtly higher propencity” to have frame drops in effects heavy scenes.
Yes you can watch the video again right at 4:33 and 8:12
But ps5 is using CB so again it basically mean that render less pixels than the xsx and still the difference is a minuscole 0.13% ..ps4pro setup dosnt answer to this perfomancesWell, its not a 1-1 comprison first of all due to the CBR on PS5. Alex says that Series X exhibits ”a sligtly higher propencity” to have frame drops in effects heavy scenes.
According to VGTech the performance is very slightly in PS5s favour:
Where exactly is performance in Series X favour?
Its renders a higher pixel amount than Series X based on a originally lower pixel amount. We simply dont know what resolution/performance the PS5 would exhibit if we take the CBR out of the equation, so afaik its a pretty useless comparing the two. If i were to take a guess the PS5 would render a slightly lower res than Series X if it was using DRS but we do simply dont know, its just guessing.
No it's not. The claim is that 1) they didn't use the full features of the hardware. I claim - give an example of a multiplat using the full features of the hardware from last gen. 2) the port came from the PC or from PS4 pro (which also came from PC). My claim - show me a scenario by which we can make said claims. Show me a multiplat game that aside from the PC version uses the full capabilities of the hardware (even if we can't really prove that since there are no advertised benchmarks of the games).
Ah.. the mesh shading excuse. So if any game isn't using an added API functionality like mesh shading, then it's not using the hardware to the fullest. I guess DF, VGTech and all the other journalist need to stop doing comparisons of multiplatform games until mesh shading gets implemented in all games..
Judging by CBR performance boosts in other games, PS5 would run Avengers at around 40 fps at native 4K (CBR increases performance by roughly 50%). Extrapolating from that, something like 1600p native seems to be the ballpark for 60 fps.
that is a different issue than the DOF. The PS5 texture doesn't look higher res, it looks more contrasted. could be CB reconstruction side effect or an Anisotropic filtering issue on the Xbox. Possible VRS on Xbox but on im not convinced of that.This isnt the case that blur isnt just depth of field anybody with an intellect in graphics can notice that, even in other areas without depth of field the textures are still of higher quality than ps5, for instance there is no depth of field here but look at those rocks at the background!
PS5 is 12% more performant at the biggest stress point according to the chart (57 vs 51). We have no idea what it may be at the top end due to 60 cap.
You do realize that this game does not have unlocked frame rates, right? Developers lock frame rates. In this case, at 60 FPS.
Upset? Lol im not the one making excuses for the shortcomings of any console in any of these faceoffs. I just find it amusing how up in arms you guys get over this
Ps5 "won" Crash 4. Just go celebrate that "win" and call it a day.
There's also a screenshot of a Twitter dm posted on here where a dirt dev says something along the lines of not being able to get enough time with the gdk due to covid. But narratives will have people ignore what doesn't fit theirs.
Not really. Both consoles drop the resolution in heavier scenes, which means they can't sustain 60 fps. It's unlikely that there's a lot of overhead.
30 fps mode doesn't push the CPU at all. It's not a good benchmark.
Yes you can watch the video again right at 4:33 and 8:12
And heres another screenshot
And below is a series s screenshot from a similar scene
This could be optimization issues between series consoles where in most games due to apis games tend to mistakenly use similar seetings between series s and x.
Or that xsx have more headroom on top of what we are seeing. Personally I don't think the CB is there just because "lazy devs" .. especially in a game where the developers were paid additionally by Sony to develop 1 exclusive character.
