• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PS5 price to increase in select markets

phil_t98

#SonyToo
😂 buying Bungie compared to someone spending cash on a pricey car they do not need and then asking for a raise essentially…

$5 Billion considering Sony (much of that being long term bonuses to help retain staff, actual cost now being less) and keeping the published multiplatform vs $70+ Billion for two publisher from a company that made far far far less profits in gaming… again we are going in circles with you trying to ignore anything that does not say “Sony=evil”… oh well…


bringing Microsoft into it again, comparing Microsoft to justify a price increase. are you not one of the people who said Sony doesn't need to buy studios because their own games are so good like god of war and boast about Sony profits. now that they have increased the price its poor Sony needing more money to compete with Microsoft. laughable
 

MastaKiiLA

Member
...or get this...wait for the games to come to PC.

I know, I know...I was once one of those proponents of keeping at least a lengthy delay between console launch and PC release. And honestly, I think they should probably still do that. But I think the supply issues have hit a point where gamers should be encouraged to pursue PC setups that can outpace the new gen of consoles graphically. I mean, it's almost 2 years post-launch now. I can't buy a PS5, but I can probably cobble together a competitive HTPC. I already bought a laptop that's really close, so PC gamers can definitely put together competent rigs. Xbox games will all come to PC, and now most PS games will too. Anything you can't get there you can get via PS+. So raising the price on the console makes sense for Sony, but savvy gamers can definitely pursue other avenues with confidence now.
 

Panajev2001a

GAF's Pleasant Genius
Microsoft making a balance sheet transaction for purchases is nothing to do with this, it's a choice to pass increasing costs to the consumer on a very profitable division.
Sure, it is a choice. A personal gift from good guy CEO. Nothing to do with finance, investors, overall company resources vs resources available for gaming generated from the gaming division, etc… sure…
 

Panajev2001a

GAF's Pleasant Genius
bringing Microsoft into it again, comparing Microsoft to justify a price increase. are you not one of the people who said Sony doesn't need to buy studios because their own games are so good like god of war and boast about Sony profits. now that they have increased the price its poor Sony needing more money to compete with Microsoft. laughable
I did not say that they need or need not to buy studios, I said that so far they preferred to either secure very long term partners (Bluepoint, Insonmiac, Sucker Punch, etc…) and to then grow them organically (they are still hiring and expanding) vs buying studios and publishers to simply expand share.

With Bungle they veered off of that track to expand in the live services arena they lacked experience off and ensured they would remain multiplatform. So?
Still ignoring the economic angle and trying to compare $5 Billion vs $70 Billion purchases I see…
 
Last edited:

Riky

$MSFT
Sure, it is a choice. A personal gift from good guy CEO. Nothing to do with finance, investors, overall company resources vs resources available for gaming generated from the gaming division, etc… sure…

Cross subsidy between divisions of a company is hardly breaking news, MS obviously see profits in the long run or they wouldn't invest.
I seriously doubt anyone saying at Sony we need to raise hardware prices because MS purchased Bethesda, they are doing it to protect margins in an inflationary market, nothing more nothing less.
 

Banjo64

cumsessed
I feels like Sony is doing everything possible to sabotage themselves at this point.

£70 games in the UK.
Price increase off £30 for the console.

I feel like their good will with fans will run out if they keep this up.
Microsoft allow you to buy digitally from other regions as well and then you can redeem the codes through a free VPN on your browser while logged in to your main account. It leads to games like Elden Ring costing £24 on release day for Xbox. They really don’t want to put themselves in this corner as the market isn’t as loyal as they think. As soon as TeS 6 or Avowed starts getting rave reviews people will happily look the other way, like they did with the 360.
 

phil_t98

#SonyToo
I did not say that they need or need not to buy studios, I said that so far they preferred to either secure very long term partners (Bluepoint, Insonmiac, Sucker Punch, etc…) and to then grow them organically (they are still hiring and expanding) vs buying studios and publishers to simply expand share.

With Bungle they veered off of that track to expand in the live services arena they lacked experience off and ensured they would remain multiplatform. So?

so why spend that money and not internally grow?

they have spent 5 billion in profits and now putting prices up. do you not see how that is not great for the consumer. we have so much money to do this but.............we gonna put the price up now
 

GHG

Member
Ffs guys studio purchases have nothing to do with the price increases. It's a lot more simple than that.

Exchange rates, inflation, supply chains. In that order.
 

nbkicker

Member
Like everything in the uk now, you dont no how much they need to put prices up on things or if they joining the band wagon just to make more profit and use the war etc as a excuse
 

Pelta88

Member
Your argument is: inflation is affecting every industry, especially in Europe, so Sony is justified

My response is: Consumers can give fuck-all if the price hike is justified or not. This is a bad look and will look even worse if Sony's direct competitors, who are also affected by these same global events, do not follow suit with similar price hikes.

No.

My argument is that there are some here desperate to turn this into some console warrior narrative and that only works by side stepping the fact that there's a global economic downturn coupled with soaringing inflation. In my country, our government has openly admitted that some of our population will literally freeze to death this winter because they can't meet the rise in energy costs.

And the UK is the fourth richest country in the world... There is context here that some are wilfully ignoring to push a console warrior narrative.
 
Last edited:
There's no good reason to do this, unless Sony believes they will keep immediately selling out all the consoles they produce. We'll see if they're correct.
The PS5 has been massively underpriced for the last two years. The market value of a PS5 was $700-750 for about two years and only went down recently. Sony believes the market will bear a higher price than $499, so let's see how that goes especially if the competition doesn't increase prices.
 
When have you ever seen a sought after product drop in price during a recession?
I do hope you realise how asinine this comment is?

They should've done NOTHING with the price. Not up it while peoples spending capacity is decreasing.
Its not rocket science now is it.....

Basically, Sony blew off both it's feet by doing this. The console is hard to get as it is (produced units-wise) and now it'll be harder to get also for a lot of people money-wise.
It's a negative double whammy. And its plain stupid.
 
Last edited:

Panajev2001a

GAF's Pleasant Genius
Cross subsidy between divisions of a company is hardly breaking news, MS obviously see profits in the long run or they wouldn't invest.
I am not saying it is news, it is a legal (still) business tactic. It is what it is: you are outspending your competition to ensure you conquer the pie in the end as you decided the total pie is worth investing in (which means you will want to recoup the investment once you have won that market over and you control it ;)).

The more money you invest from other divisions in terms of absolute subsidies vs your competition can cause competitors that were competitive not to en able to be anymore due to not a lot of fault of their own, this is not to excuse Sony here but you do concede as a point that subsidies can do this or see we still pretending they do not?

I seriously doubt anyone saying at Sony we need to raise hardware prices because MS purchased Bethesda, they are doing it to protect margins in an inflationary market, nothing more nothing less.
It is not just that but recession, inflation, profit margins increase to protect long term sustainability and keep investors happy, etc… are real things… oh no, simpler to just keep an “Evil Greedy Sony” angle. Again, if you think that plopping $100 Billion range money out of thin air from other divisions does not change things you are will fully deciding to ignore things, oh well…
 

cormack12

Gold Member
Being an early adopter pays off for once! Call me cynical but this increase just ahead of what i expect to be a sizeable drop of holiday availability?

At the end of the day, they must have highly paid analysts costing this out, but to everyone who bought from a scalper this is what happens. If people buy a product at inflated prices, then the company will eventually charge those markups, because why not?

mockingjay-katniss-you-burn-with-us.gif


Be interesting to see if this has a domino effect of smaller increases as well for the other console manufacturers. I do think this is missing the mark though, the console market is not a premium market, that's PC. A console has always been a relatively expensive one time purchase for a lot of families but affordable. Pushing the hardware price up, about to drop what we all expect to be an expensive step up in VR, the price raise on games is kind of pushing the package or ecosystem into unaffordable for core markets imo.

For the likes of us on this forum, it won't really be an issue. Most of us seem to have steady jobs, good management of personal finance etc. probably a lot of us are considering the PSVR2 in all honesty. But equally even we are baulking at some of these things, families from the backgrounds a lot of us came from are just not going to buy in. I know there are competing strategies out there and Sony have committed to local device, high production titles but pushing that console experience into a premium cohort of consumers is not the right move imo. The timing is also really off coming up to holiday. Waiting until after New Year would have been better.
 

Panajev2001a

GAF's Pleasant Genius
I do hope you realise how asinine this comment is?

They should've done NOTHING with the price. Not up it while peoples spending capacity is decreasing.
Its not rocket science now is it.....
Your employer will love how you plan not to ask for raises this year or plan to accept a lower than rate of inflation one ;). Again, I get your point but let’s not be completely off in the wilderness here…
 
Last edited:

Mr.ODST

Member
Microsoft allow you to buy digitally from other regions as well and then you can redeem the codes through a free VPN on your browser while logged in to your main account. It leads to games like Elden Ring costing £24 on release day for Xbox. They really don’t want to put themselves in this corner as the market isn’t as loyal as they think. As soon as TeS 6 or Avowed starts getting rave reviews people will happily look the other way, like they did with the 360.
If i want an old game say its £45 on the xbox store, I can just goto a key website and get it for £9, I save so much money for older games this way
 

Banjo64

cumsessed
If i want an old game say its £45 on the xbox store, I can just goto a key website and get it for £9, I save so much money for older games this way
Just check out the Argentinian keys and your head would probably fall off in shock - Koa the Kangaroo was £3 on launch day.
 

anthony2690

Banned
Microsoft allow you to buy digitally from other regions as well and then you can redeem the codes through a free VPN on your browser while logged in to your main account. It leads to games like Elden Ring costing £24 on release day for Xbox. They really don’t want to put themselves in this corner as the market isn’t as loyal as they think. As soon as TeS 6 or Avowed starts getting rave reviews people will happily look the other way, like they did with the 360.
I don't do any off that stuff, I always worry about marketplace theft bans, since when people got injustice 1 free changing regions etc. (But I do change region to buy region exclusive games raiden 4/bullet soul infinite burst, as raiden 4 is region locked on 360, but completely region free on Xbox one/series consoles & this doesn't require vpn either)

Plus I prefer hard copies, what you can get fairly cheap anyway, I got elden ring day one for £35 at Amazon, no idea why it was so cheap.

& I use thegamecollection what seem to have reasonable prices for day one games.

Also for all my UK buddies, if you use the Amazon app, you can use code APP10UK & get £10 off a preorder, so you can get the series X version of Callisto Protocol for £35 and the ps5 version for £33!

I personally went for dark tide for £19.99 though :)
 

Panajev2001a

GAF's Pleasant Genius
To add to the price argument as well, not only have Nintendo confirmed no price increase but their games are £35 on launch day in the UK.

£35? First of all their profit margins are likely a lot higher and the development costs likely a lot lower (not just because most of their workforce is in Japan and software engineer and artist wages are a lot lower than in the west), but £35?

S8g3n5S.jpg

GqJ45J1.jpg
 

Banjo64

cumsessed
£35? First of all their profit margins are likely a lot higher and the development costs likely a lot lower (not just because most of their workforce is in Japan and software engineer and artist wages are a lot lower than in the west), but £35?

S8g3n5S.jpg

GqJ45J1.jpg
*from Curry’s, Shopto and other physical distributors in the UK.

And yes, Sony physical games are also cheaper than £70 but absolutely nowhere near £35 anywhere close to launch.
 
Last edited:

GHG

Member
In what jurisdiction if you talk about legal definition. Because my laws are different than your laws.

WARN act. Any states that have passed the law.

Overseas you will find similar information if you search for "mass redundancy" since redundancy is the legal term used instead of "layoff" in many countries.

In the UK for example it is even more stringent - anything over 20 people in a single go is defined as a mass redundancy and the business has certain duties it needs to fulfill in such a situation.

Salty Popsicle Salty Popsicle further reading for you as well.
 

ACESHIGH

Banned
The thing is... there's always cumulative inflation across a console lifecycle. Sony is doing it because gamers (specially in Europe) have been indoctrinated so much by 30 years of champions league ads that they woild buy a box full of turds with Sony logo.

This is MS chance to gain marketshare worldwide.
 

Ozriel

M$FT
not gona defend that price increase, but i think its cause of demand of PS5, here in Finland u cant find PS5 in anywhere except from scalpers and some nut stores for like 900€ :messenger_expressionless:

whereas Series X/S can be found everywhere

This is a near global price increase that isn’t based on availability in Finland.

I am not saying it is news, it is a legal (still) business tactic. It is what it is: you are outspending your competition to ensure you conquer the pie in the end as you decided the total pie is worth investing in (which means you will want to recoup the investment once you have won that market over and you control it ;)).

The more money you invest from other divisions in terms of absolute subsidies vs your competition can cause competitors that were competitive not to en able to be anymore due to not a lot of fault of their own, this is not to excuse Sony here but you do concede as a point that subsidies can do this or see we still pretending they do not?

I must confess i can’t see the mechanism behind how MS investments in Xbox will prevent Sony from continuing to make, market and sell games.

It is not just that but recession, inflation, profit margins increase to protect long term sustainability and keep investors happy, etc… are real things… oh no, simpler to just keep an “Evil Greedy Sony” angle. Again, if you think that plopping $100 Billion range money out of thin air from other divisions does not change things you are will fully deciding to ignore things, oh well…

But more importantly, I can’t understand why you’re bringing this shit up in this thread which is about Sony deciding to hike prices up on what was recently claimed to be profitable hardware instead of just eating the cost and making it back on software sales.
 

Panajev2001a

GAF's Pleasant Genius
*from Curry’s, Shopto and other physical distributors in the UK.
Ok, so if one can find cheaper prices than Sony SRP in any store it invalidated the argument around their price increases? I do not honk it is fair to say that their games are £35 in the U.K. that is all.
 

ckaneo

Member
I'm not too mad at them increasing the prices due to various factors out of their control....but this is why I was against the prices hikes before inflation/war hit when they were making record breaking profits. Anyone who brought it up was brushed off as not "supporting developers" or "games should already cost more" or whatever the fuck excuses people would make for game prices increases.
 

Panajev2001a

GAF's Pleasant Genius
This is a near global price increase that isn’t based on availability in Finland.



I must confess i can’t see the mechanism behind how MS investments in Xbox will prevent Sony from continuing to make, market and sell games.



But more importantly, I can’t understand why you’re bringing this shit up in this thread which is about Sony deciding to hike prices up on what was recently claimed to be profitable hardware instead of just eating the cost and making it back on software sales.

Because this is not an isolated thing where Sony went insane and just raised prices, so with macro economical shift you need to also look at what is the competition doing and why they can afford to do so or not. Otherwise we can keep on a “anti consumer vs pro consumer” level discussion and throw rotten fruit at each other all day… 🤷‍♂️.
 

Fafalada

Fafracer forever
Is this the first time a company has raised a console price after launch?
No.
Post 2008 there was a ton of price increases all over Asia and some other regions.

And of course we had NDS which increased price with every new SKU practically, but that helped ppl swallow it a bit better.
 
Top Bottom