The_Mike
I cry about SonyGaf from my chair in Redmond, WA
Nvidia is easily dominating over amd, despite having more expensive gpus than the competitor.
But why?
Every time we hear an nvidia thread about insane prices, everyone believes amd could take a market share. I also read people hoping for more people to jump on amd, even though they won't them selves.
I've tried amd as well like one and a half decade ago, and while the output on the card was great, I had problems in most games because of shitty drivers.
But and mist surely have improved since then.
Is it because amd has ghosts from the past, or are they still behind performance wise?
Also, what's the reason miners tend to use nvidia cards and not amd?
I'm a green snake in this, but I wouldn't be surprised if amd wouldn't exist if it wasn't for console manufacturing.
But why?
Every time we hear an nvidia thread about insane prices, everyone believes amd could take a market share. I also read people hoping for more people to jump on amd, even though they won't them selves.
I've tried amd as well like one and a half decade ago, and while the output on the card was great, I had problems in most games because of shitty drivers.
But and mist surely have improved since then.
Is it because amd has ghosts from the past, or are they still behind performance wise?
Also, what's the reason miners tend to use nvidia cards and not amd?
I'm a green snake in this, but I wouldn't be surprised if amd wouldn't exist if it wasn't for console manufacturing.