• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Hermen Hulst - PlayStation GAAS releasing day-one on PC, SP games at least one year after console release

64bitmodels

Reverse groomer.
You forgot the best one: "“And to maybe put a few minds at ease, releasing one first-party AAA title to PC doesn’t necessarily mean that every game now will come to PC. In my mind, Horizon Zero Dawn was just a great fit in this particular instance.”

Now it's "PS5 exclusive at least 1 year for SP, and Day One for GaaS"...

I mean yeah... Fuck this subhuman liar
I know that telling a fib is bad, but holy fucking shit calm the fuck down. You're calling the person behind the Playstation brand you love so much subhuman. What the actual fuck is wrong with you? Are the games still not coming to PS? Is this really worth calling someone less than human for HELPING the industry?
 

SlimySnake

Flashless at the Golden Globes
If you have a better PC, and if you are capable of waiting, and if the PC version is highly optimized

Lots of ifs
Sony is adding dlss3.0 support for 40 series cards in time for launch.

Meanwhile fsr 2.0 has been out for months but ps5 games haven’t been patched for them. They are clearly putting more effort into their PC ports.
 

Calverz

Gold Member
That's bait.
This is great news. Now I can sell my ps5 before the value falls out the arse of it once the masses understands what this means.
 

Stuart360

Member
Sony is adding dlss3.0 support for 40 series cards in time for launch.

Meanwhile fsr 2.0 has been out for months but ps5 games haven’t been patched for them. They are clearly putting more effort into their PC ports.
I think its more getting these options into PC ports because there are low, mid, and high end PC users. While on PS5 they target one spec.
 

SSfox

Member
I know that telling a fib is bad, but holy fucking shit calm the fuck down. You're calling the person behind the Playstation brand you love so much subhuman. What the actual fuck is wrong with you? Are the games still not coming to PS? Is this really worth calling someone less than human for HELPING the industry?
I'm stating facts, he's a liar and his wording speak for itself.

Also not helping industry to me. He is destorying the PS brand for the sake of his own fantasies.
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
Glad I made the jump to PC this gen. Could see the winds of change blowing this way since multiple PS5 games appeared on PC, which is unprecedented in the history of Playstation.
If your a GAAS gamer, even better. Probably all of them (they got over 10 in the works) will be day one on PC.
 

cormack12

Gold Member
That's fair. Nice middle ground.

Be interesting when we see the first game that specifies SSD only for PC

  • Additional Notes: 60 GB HDD (SSD Recommended)
 

Stuart360

Member
I'm stating facts, he's a liar and his wording speak for itself.

Also not helping industry to me. He is destorying the PS brand for the sake of his own fantasies.
He's just bending the truth to keep the Sony faithful on his side. Plus decisions like this change over time.

They are looking at this from a business perspective,while you seem to be looking at this whole situation from a Sony fanboy perspective. I guess you probably gave Xbox shit for years for bringing their games to PC?, maybe.
 

Fredrik

Member
So it was 2 years....now it's one year!

So, 6 months next year....then day and date in 2024?
We can only hope but I have my doubts, they clearly like the double dipping money.
Game - Console day 1
Game, higher fps/res - PC 1y later
Game remaster - Console day 1
Game remaster, higher fps/res - PC 1y later
Game Remake - Console day 1
Game Remake, higher fps/res - PC 1y later
Fans buying it all 💰
 
Last edited:

Thirty7ven

Banned
I'm stating facts, he's a liar and his wording speak for itself.

Also not helping industry to me. He is destorying the PS brand for the sake of his own fantasies.

Don’t be loco. This will make the PS brand bigger, nothing more.

A console is a value proposition in terms of hardware, it does not matter if the game eventually releases on PC.
 

64bitmodels

Reverse groomer.
I'm stating facts, he's a liar and his wording speak for itself.

Also not helping industry to me. He is destorying the PS brand for the sake of his own fantasies.
You are calling him subhuman. Over plastic boxes with electronics in them. And how the fuck is this destroying the brand?? PCs have flaws that for some people may make consoles more preferable. Do you honestly think little 8 year old Jimmy is gonna get a PC over a Playstation 5 despite them playing the exact same fucking games?
Playstation could go day 1 with exclusives and the PS5 will still sell well over 100 million. The brand is a titan and its not going anywhere
 
Last edited:

SSfox

Member
He's just bending the truth to keep the Sony faithful on his side. Plus decisions like this change over time.

They are looking at this from a business perspective,while you seem to be looking at this whole situation from a Sony fanboy perspective. I guess you probably gave Xbox shit for years for bringing their games to PC?, maybe.
I wasn't a fan of XBox putting their games on PC, but i didn't talk much about because MS already lost me with Kinect followed by DRM and Cie. Haven't bought XBox One, and have no plan in buyin Xbox Series S/X.

We will talk about it being good business decisions or not when the consoles and PS+ subs will drop in numbers. And not even talking about quality downgrade when they start releasing buggy games because of non fully focus on one hardware, it already started with HZFW.
 
Last edited:

SSfox

Member
Don’t be loco. This will make the PS brand bigger, nothing more.

A console is a value proposition in terms of hardware, it does not matter if the game eventually releases on PC.
Just like Xbox is now bigger than ever?... Oups

Xbox peak was at 360, once they started porting games on PC nobody gives 2 shit about owning an Xbox. And Playstation is gonna follow the same lame model, the difference is Xbox can allow themselves losing too much money unlike the others.
 

Thirty7ven

Banned
Just like Xbox is now bigger than ever?... Oups

Xbox peak was at 360, once they started porting games on PC nobody gives 2 shit about owning an Xbox. And Playstation is gonna follow the same lame model, the difference is Xbox can allow themselves losing too much money unlike the others.

Guess you just have to wait and see. Let me just say people who think this will somehow tank PS5 sales… are low IQ individuals.
 
Last edited:

Bo_Hazem

Banned
Still think they will be launching day and date on PC by the end of this gen. And even if they dont, 1 year is nothing for us PC gamers, we are used to it since the arrival of the EPIC Shitstore.

They are looking at the bigger picture. PC gamers will always buy multiplats on PC anyway and won't commit to PS5. Hope this helps them out to make more great games.
 
Games are being concurrently designed on PC and PS5. PCs dont have the PS5 IO. It's basic logic.

I must be missing this basic logic. Aren't there requirements on PC? What's to say they just don't require DX12 and an SSD? Sure, during game development you use a unified asset database, but then you optimize for the platform. You can design for PS5 and then port to PC. What's the problem here?

It almost feels like you're starting with a chosen outcome and then working the argument backwards to make it fit.
 
Last edited:

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
I wasn't a fan of XBox putting their games on PC, but i didn't talk much about because MS already lost me with Kinect followed by DRM and Cie.

We will talk about it being good business decisions or not when the consoles and PS+ subs will drop in numbers. And not even talking about quality downgrade when they start releasing buggy games because of non fully focus on one hardware, it already started with HZFW.
For me, cross play games is a zero issue. It doesn’t revenue matter which console ported games. I’m sure there were old Genesis and snes games that were ported to PC, as well as all the early PS and Xbox games that surely ported over the past 25 years.

When Gears 1 got a PC port a year later with extra missions, who cares.

I’ll let the accountants at their head offices worry about which platform(s) to release games on to maximize profits.
 

Spukc

always chasing the next thrill
cool so i bought my playstation 5 to play a shittier version 1 year earlier.
oh well still cool i get to play earlier and since games are getting so expensive to make it also makes sense to go multiplat.

it would be nice if they would stop fucking releasing the games on 9 year old hardware tho. i want my next gen games like demon souls/ratchet clank
 

64bitmodels

Reverse groomer.
Just like Xbox is now bigger than ever?... Oups

Xbox peak was at 360, once they started porting games on PC nobody gives 2 shit about owning an Xbox. And Playstation is gonna follow the same lame model, the difference is Xbox can allow themselves losing too much money unlike the others.
Nintendo is bigger than ever and with little setup you can play all of their best games on your PC. Isn't stopping the switch and it's massive dominance though
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
cool so i bought my playstation 5 to play a shittier version 1 year earlier.
oh well still cool i get to play earlier and since games are getting so expensive to make it also makes sense to go multiplat.

it would be nice if they would stop fucking releasing the games on 9 year old hardware tho. i want my next gen games like demon souls/ratchet clank

PS5 and Xbox are better than like 92-95% of PC gamers. Here we mostly have extreme examples of PC gamers, yet PS5/XSX would be much more powerful than average gaming PC's. Also if MGS6 was an Xbox exclusive for 1 year I would buy an XSX. Waiting 1 year for a game to come is the saddest thing ever. Live today as you don't know what will happen in the future, like nuke fest with current lunacy.
 

Fbh

Member
People just need to accept consoles are officially just way more limited but more affordable and streamlined PC's now.
Want decent performance for a relatively low price? Get a console, want more freedom and potentially better performance at a higher cost? get a PC.

Releasing the live service games on PC day 1 makes sense. Live service games need a big active user base to thrive and it's going to be hard to get that on just Ps5 (specially if the live service games will also be $70).
 

Spukc

always chasing the next thrill
PS5 and Xbox are better than like 92-95% of PC gamers. Here we mostly have extreme examples of PC gamers, yet PS5/XSX would be much more powerful than average gaming PC's. Also if MGS6 was an Xbox exclusive for 1 year I would buy an XSX. Waiting 1 year for a game to come is the saddest thing ever. Live today as you don't know what will happen in the future, like nuke fest with current lunacy.
aye the year is worth it for me but i can understand that plenty of pc gamers truly don't give a shit. Also GL charging full price for a 1 year old SP port with youtube walkthroughs
 
Last edited:

kyliethicc

Member
VsMqri7.png
5rDWFII.gif
 

bitbydeath

Gold Member
People just need to accept consoles are officially just way more limited but more affordable and streamlined PC's now.
Want decent performance for a relatively low price? Get a console, want more freedom and potentially better performance at a higher cost? get a PC.

Releasing the live service games on PC day 1 makes sense. Live service games need a big active user base to thrive and it's going to be hard to get that on just Ps5 (specially if the live service games will also be $70).
Live service games are really easy to port and have very little to test. If Sony could do the same for SP games they probably would, but currently it’s not possible.
 

Clear

CliffyB's Cock Holster
cool so i bought my playstation 5 to play a shittier version 1 year earlier.

So, what do you suggest; They gimp the PC version because you can't ever spec up a console to match a high-end PC without (at an absolute minimum) doubling the price?
 

64bitmodels

Reverse groomer.
PS5 and Xbox are better than like 92-95% of PC gamers. Here we mostly have extreme examples of PC gamers, yet PS5/XSX would be much more powerful than average gaming PC's. Also if MGS6 was an Xbox exclusive for 1 year I would buy an XSX. Waiting 1 year for a game to come is the saddest thing ever. Live today as you don't know what will happen in the future, like nuke fest with current lunacy.
Wow, I feel kinda special being part of the 8% lol.
 

Black_Stride

do not tempt fate do not contrain Wonder Woman's thighs do not do not
The costs would be through the roof.
And Sony are so strapped for cash amirite?

Small independent developers can release a game day and date on Xbox, Playstation, Switch and PC......but not the megacorp Sony.
Nope that they just cant do.
Way too expensive and outside of their technical know how.
 
Just like Xbox is now bigger than ever?... Oups

Xbox peak was at 360, once they started porting games on PC nobody gives 2 shit about owning an Xbox. And Playstation is gonna follow the same lame model, the difference is Xbox can allow themselves losing too much money unlike the others.
Just a hint, Series is comfortably outselling the 360. Revenue is more than double compared to back then, too.
 

Fbh

Member
Live service games are really easy to port and have very little to test. If Sony could do the same for SP games they probably would, but currently it’s not possible.

I don't get what would make live service games easy to port and test. Specially if they are making them with high production values.
The majority of third party devs release their single player games on multiple consoles at launch, I don't see why Sony wouldn't be able to make a day 1 PC version if they really wanted to.
 

bitbydeath

Gold Member
And Sony are so strapped for cash amirite?

Small independent developers can release a game day and date on Xbox, Playstation, Switch and PC......but not the megacorp Sony.
Nope that they just cant do.
Way too expensive and outside of their technical know how.
You’re still talking additional unnecessary cost.
It may only add $100,000 onto the development but that’s still $100,000 they don’t need to spend.
 

bitbydeath

Gold Member
I don't get what would make live service games easy to port and test. Specially if they are making them with high production values.
The majority of third party devs release their single player games on multiple consoles at launch, I don't see why Sony wouldn't be able to make a day 1 PC version if they really wanted to.
No AI, no scripting, no closed off levels etc.
Live service games don’t have the intricacies that SP games do. Often it’s only 1-10 maps.
 

Black_Stride

do not tempt fate do not contrain Wonder Woman's thighs do not do not
You’re still talking additional unnecessary cost.
It may only add $100,000 onto the development but that’s still $100,000 they don’t need to spend.
You think they wont make that money back on Steam?
Every single Sony game since this new stance has sold gangbusters on Steam.
That cost is borderline irrelevant considering how much they are expanding their market.
 

Fbh

Member
No AI, no scripting, no closed off levels etc.
Live service games don’t have the intricacies that SP games do. Often it’s only 1-10 maps.

Live service games aren't just PVP multiplayer.
Destiny is a live service game and has all the elements you mention
 

bitbydeath

Gold Member
You think they wont make that money back on Steam?
Every single Sony game since this new stance has sold gangbusters on Steam.
That cost is borderline irrelevant considering how much they are expanding their market.
They’d still be out of pocket compared to porting once it has gone gold. The only reason MS switched to day and date on PC was because they moved to DirectX.
 
Top Bottom