Why is it always Russia? MW3 already did that.
Current generic evil enemy.
Give it a few years and the left will complain louder that the game industry is demonizing their communist view points then their will be a new generic enemy
squad?insurgency?cs go?world war 3?bf3/4?hell let loose? plenty of choice out there.Please don’t fuck this up. I need a proper multiplayer shooter that isn’t a ducking battle royale or cod
Just started playing bf5, overall decent game, but what’s up with women on the battlefield?
SUPER COLLAPSIBLE SKYSCRAPERDICE lost majority of its veteran/best devs in past years. Their peak was in 2011 with Battlefield 3 but instead of building onto that game they decided sequel every 2 years is better idea. BF3 was also marketed as serious take on WW3, while 4 was: jump out of collapsing building in atv while shooting rpg mid air
BF4 was when they decided to chase after COD's tail.DICE lost majority of its veteran/best devs in past years. Their peak was in 2011 with Battlefield 3 but instead of building onto that game they decided sequel every 2 years is better idea. BF3 was also marketed as serious take on WW3, while 4 was: jump out of collapsing building in atv while shooting rpg mid air
Until they give us Bad Company 3, DICE ain’t getting my money.
As long as it's not futuristic bullshit I'm down
DICE lost majority of its veteran/best devs in past years. Their peak was in 2011 with Battlefield 3 but instead of building onto that game they decided sequel every 2 years is better idea. BF3 was also marketed as serious take on WW3, while 4 was: jump out of collapsing building in atv while shooting rpg mid air
Why? 2142 was great.As long as it's not futuristic bullshit I'm down
Only adversary more pathetic than Russia, was that game with North Korea as the Enemy. it was originally China but you cannot offend the CCP.
Why? 2142 was great.
Thats the problem. They replaced all of their veteran developers with these social justice rejects. Just like BioWare. Similar results.I anticipate the same "if you don't like it, don't buy it" frankness from them. It worked so well last time out. I'm sure in WW3 there will be disabled, gender fluid soldiers taking it to the opposition. I'm all about it.
Well some of us prefer realism over fiction.
But I'm not a self hating white man so idk.
But hey, the US government probably spoonfeeds you propaganda about how terrifying these unprincipled Muslims are, but never tell you about the multiple drone strikes that wipe out entire families by either careless conduct or direct intention. I wouldn't blame you, pal.
Not really. I love in Europe where we have plenty of problems with them. Rape, murder, other criminality. So I witness it first hand.
Haven't seen any us drones in Scandinavia yet, but that may change I guess?
This game will undoubtedly feature the US as the protagonists, though. Do you truly believe the US government is free of all flaws? You think in every conflict, they start out benign? Naive, naive child...
Ah, the Russo-Finnish Cyber War
I never said that though did I?
As a Scandinavian I don't really care. I care about those destroying my country.
sorry but if you mean a BF1 dlc your wrong its a downgrade from BF1 calling a huge DLC its a compliment.I also really enjoyed BF1, but playing BFV to me felt like some kind of huge DLC.
Your original stance was that a white male antagonist was an unrealistic notion, meaning you're implicitly calling colored races the root problem even though that is wildly untrue.
Leaked preview images of the two sides:
NATO vs RUSSIA
![]()
![]()
I thought BF1 was sick. I had so much fun with that game. The only redeemable thing about bf5 was crouch running.
I want to believe. I want to believe so bad.![]()
Battlefield 2042 Leak Suggests the Franchise Is Heading to the Future
A new major leak for the Battlefield franchise suggests that the series is heading to the future, with Battlefield 2042 coming soon.gamingintel.com
Would be much more fun to fight as China or Russia against America. Not sure what there scared of Americans love shooting each other![]()