-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Elden Ring, Sekiro, Bloodborne as 1980's Dark Fantasy Movies
SlimeGooGoo
Party Gooper
MODS MODS THERE'S A BOOB IN MY FAMILY-FRIENDLY GAMING FORUM
SlimeGooGoo
Party Gooper
In all honesty though, most concept artists will probably end up losing their jobs
Draugoth
Gold Member
Good thing i quit the art career
Last edited:
Fully engaged
Banned
This kind of take makes me laugh.. Where do you think the AI gets its ideas? Hint it doesnt actually have any of its own.
ThatStupidLion
Member
Wow thats impressive.
Ghost of Caelid
Banned
Sekiro looks cool.
Griffon
Member
So... it's the same as humans then?
Where do you think humans do?
Punished Miku
Member
Really nailed that 80s look. These are some great shots.
SlimeGooGoo
Party Gooper
Emphasis on *most*
The average joe will definitely get replaced eventually. Only masters of their craft will keep their jobs.
jimmypython
Member
Bloodborne ones look very nice haha
GnomeChimpsky
Member
TV shows are even worse. Going from Willow the movie to Willow the series is just painful.
Lunarorbit
Member
These are amazing. Some of the bloodborne monsters look great
BennyBlanco
aka IMurRIVAL69
How long until we can generate videogames through text prompts?
Fully engaged
Banned
From God obviously.
That isnt what I mean. The AI uses existing art and images to make these pictures. It has been proven that it is just copyright stealing, and it will eventually come under extreme scrutiny. These images are great, but they are not as original as they seem. parts are grabbed and stitched together. Those parts belonged to artists.
Mister Wolf
Gold Member
Awesome pics. Do any of you old-timers remember this movie?
Fully engaged
Banned
This is silly. Most concept art is far more specific and unique than AI can make. These do look great, and they are fun, but they are not replacing real artists anytime soon. Everything I have seen so far.. and I have looked at a lot, looks worse than the images people post on steam pages. So considerably worse than fan art.
Just take a look at the real film poster above. For The Sword and the Sorcerer. Look how interesting and unique it is. That is 30 plus year old poster and it is more interesting than anything I have seen from an AI feeding off text.
Last edited:
First of all, that's not how image generation works - as in, the 'ai' doesn't stich together images from all over. It doesn't copy. If it did, this topic would be much simpler.
Whether or not something is copyrighted is irrelevant since nothing is holding you back from training an ai model on data without copyright. The funny thing is the 'original' part you mention: What we see now is some of the earliest and most primitive iterations. In the near future AI will produce content that goes beyond what any human is able to produce, and these discussions will seem almost silly.
I hereby invite you to my new thread: https://www.neogaf.com/threads/is-a...rnet-scraped-data-a-form-of-stealing.1648807/
Klosshufvud
Member
The travesty of digital recording. Singlehandedly worst thing to have happened cinema.
Last edited:
SlimeGooGoo
Party Gooper
For promotional art or anything more sophisticated, sure. Let the few experienced humans do the job.
I was referring to the bottom line. The people at the bottom will suffer.
If companies can save money by just using AI for some quick and dirty concepts they're likely to do it.
This will likely force concept artists to charge less money for their work.
Most optimistic scenario: companies will use AI to create some "base" art en masse, and will hire fewer artists to tweak that base art to the company's liking.
Just look at some concept art for The Witcher 3, AI art is as good if not better than it (pretty sure it uses photobashing):
March Climber
Member
I actually think the individual(s) who made this 80s movie art using AI had a brilliant idea. Artists are upset because of what you and the poster above are discussing, which is art made from the obvious usage of other art styles(including obvious artist signatures being cut off).
However, AI-art drawing from film is an entirely different beast that can’t really be referenced back to a particular style. This is nothing other than “80s fantasy movie sets”. There’s no way anyone can claim these are a direct ripoff of a single individual’s art because they would have to claim that the individual created all 80s fantasy movies. This was a genius move.
mansoor1980
Gold Member
simply incredible , make this happen please
xpresstuning
Member
Some look awkward, but most look awesome and actually make me nostalgic of 80s, early 90s fantasy movies.
IAmAnAgnostic
Member
... No it hasn't been "proven," you've never used the tool and you don't understand how the tool works or the technology behind it.
The only thing you could have seen is someone applying a subset tool 'img2img' to something over an image with very low 'denoising' which literally means keep the vast majority of the original image and only change it up slightly. This is akin to saying photography can only be used to copyright steal because someone filmed a movie. Not only is this one tool which is not needed, you don't need to reference any image at all with the tool to create art, but with high denoising the new art becomes impossible to connect to the original even if you were to reference an image, which once again is not necessary.
Its either that or you read a twitter thread of someone seething artist coping and lying, but in any case, the tool is not "copyright stealing."
The Cartographer
Member
The Elden Ring one is good.
All the heroines look phenomenal (I like Millicent the best).
All the heroines look phenomenal (I like Millicent the best).