Smushroomed
Banned
I don't like the witcher 3 much but I agree that fo4 winning over witcher 3 for game or rpg of the year is terrible
Yup, such a generic and by-the-numbers game. I can't believe they went Bioware on the dialogue system. Probably my biggest disappointment of the year considering how much I wanted a Fallout 3 sequel.
The city building stuff is seriously a waste of time and I honestly don't know why they even put that in the game.
I...will never ever ever play this game ever. This is so bad it hurts me. The kid was trapped in a fridge all that time, and adjusts pretty goddamn quickly, and his parents are literally just down the street?
It's like they wrote this with their asses.
the combat looks fun, but I can feel my brain leaking out of my nose reading that story.
Excellent game even if not as good as fallout 3. Still better than witcher 3 and it's simplistic gameplay.
It's fun, but not good, and a lot of people don't get that.
Thank god we have you to vet what people find good.It's fun, but not good, and a lot of people don't get that.
i didnt even bother with the game once i found out that talking/bartering/science-ing your way through the game was not possible.
My opinion is that if the game disappointed you that much, your expectations were too high. I went in expecting an improvement on fallout 3, and that's what I got.
I'm still waiting for The Witcher 3 backlash to happen, but it hasn't come yet. The game is a triumph in terms of quest design, voice acting and narrative, but the world and gameplay are way too generic for the amount of praise the game gets.
Fallout 4 is literally the exact opposite, however. Crappy quests and questionable voice acting / dialogue, a blast to play and really fun to explore the world.
New Vegas exists and is the best 3D Fallout game.
I never played fo3 if you are claiming they improved the combat for four, then bethsoft really lost their minds. The combat was terrible.I dunno why improving the combat ended up stunting their quest design. Most of the quests are generic shoot 'em ups. The vaults are crap. I liked the dunwhich mine and salem museum i guess.
In which ways exactly? The dialogue system? Perhaps, but there wasn't a whole lot of options or choice in the dialogue in fallout 3 either. The leveling system and perks? I talked about that in my post. Fallout 3 also had perks, fallout 4 just changed the entire system into a perks system rather than basing skills on usage. It's different, but I don't see that as being a regression. It's a bit simpler, but it also allows you to change your character and pick up new skills rather easily, instead of having to train up skills you'd been neglecting or start an entirely new character. Doesn't really seem like a regression to me.Problem is that in many ways it is a regression over fallout 3.
Here yes overwhelmingly in favour of NV. Outside of here not really or atleast not that clearly.was new vegas > fo3 the concensus at the time? for whatever reason i thought people were saying fo3 > new vegas or just more of the same so i never bothered with that game
If you disagree with the OP, try to actually elucidate WHY. Posting merely "I enjoyed it" or something like that is pointless white noise at best, and a passive aggressive attempt to drown out criticism at worst. Stop.
was new vegas > fo3 the concensus at the time? for whatever reason i thought people were saying fo3 > new vegas or just more of the same so i never bothered with that game