Haha first thing i noticedBOMBSHELL Phil doesn't use grammar check.
![]()
Ybarra once told me when they were courting him Bobby took him out to lunch and dinner on several occasions from the office and Bobby would only take the helicopter to places to eat where they could land one time flying just a few blocks to avoid a 30 minute car rideGod bobby sounds like such a sleazebag.
I mean there's lots to unpick there, but picking an easy one out - Nintendo can both be in the console space and not be a competitor to Sony (or Microsoft).Soooo, in summary
Jim Ryan
- somehow thinks that Xbox Series X is supply constrained and is selling good (unlike people around here)
- Murica players likes shooty shooty stuff and that's why COD is more popular there
- he doesn't remember if he met with regulatory bodies after october 2022 (wtf?)
- Nintendo is somehow part of console market but they are not Sony's competitor (???)
- Nintendo is played by bunch of kids despite fact that Nintendo infographic proves otherwise
- Don't think that Starfield exclusivity is anti-competitive (unlike PS fans around here)
- Thinks that COD devs would sabotage PS version of COD despite fact that there is no proof that Microsoft ever did it with PS versions of their games
- He flipped because Microsoft promised him Overwatch 1 and not Overwatch 2 despite game being SAME SKU (wtf?)
- thinks that Microsoft would engage in partial foreclosure of COD because of Game Pass despite Microsoft offering him ability to put COD into PS Plus day one
- He "doesn't listen to calls" where he said to the investors that he doesn't think that Activision merger would hurt Sony (wtf?)
- He "doesn't know" if they could be competitve if deal goes through (isn't he CEO of SIE though?)
- He refused to negotiate deal with Bobby Kotick to have COD on PlayStation
- Publishers "unanimously" don't like Game Pass (despite the fact that many of them are putting day one games into Game Pass like Square Enix, Capcom, Ubisoft, Focus Entertainment etc.)
- Does not think that cloud gaming is separate market (HAHAHAHAHA)
Yeah. It was fun
Meanwhile, ABK share price is almost at 85$. So I guess that market also agrees that FTC is making spectacular job...to not have PI
Because Jim was playing hardball and these are negotiations with regulators in the end.Why did it take Phil 3 months to reply?
Irrelevant
LOL. It's a conversation with Jim Ryan. With the fucking current president of SONY.... If for you it is irrelevant when it comes to elucidating the importance of Activision for PS ...OK
If he said that I guess it means ABK has no plans to extend, unless he’s lying.So Kotick said the preliminary injunction will kill the deal.
Maybe if I email Phil Spencer that Nintendo make nail bombs, then that means Spencer wrote it and/or approved it.And how much of that "conversation" is from Jim Ryan? None. We only see the thoughts of a guy who hasn't work for Sony since 2005. Sorry....but no, what he thinks is no more relevant than what Don Mattrick thinks.
From what I've read, the PI is a huge part of this process. If the FTC loses they are probably dead in the water, and if the FTC wins they are probably going to be able to block the deal.If he said that I guess it means ABK has no plans to extend, unless he’s lying.
Doesn't sound like he's competley against putting his game on streaming providers. This is without MS.
FTC losing definitely ends their case, the judge basically granting the merger right there. It’s not that drastic on the other side if both parties are still willing.From what I've read, the PI is a huge part of this process. If the FTC loses they are probably dead in the water, and if the FTC wins they are probably going to be able to block the deal.
So I doubt he's lying, this PI is a huge deal, hence all this testimony.
Well at some point ATVI needs to get back to normal and divorce themselves from this. Their stock is basically held hostage by this process, and honestly the CMA is still such a massive hurdle to get past. The deal is still very likely to fail either way, but a loss against the FTC for this PI is going to not look good.FTC losing definitely ends their case, the judge basically granting the merger right there. It’s not that drastic on the other side if both parties are still willing.
What about the Ford GT?Think about the car market. Both Ferrari and Ford are in it, but they do not compete. They target different people, they offer products for different use cases.
I'm sure someone can do a map.Have we already decided on who is getting cooked™?
Phil lied? Fuck off, I'm shockedPhil said they acquired ABK because they need their expertise in the mobile division. Now the FTC is showing how this cannot be true since Tencent and other developers are the ones who actually developed games for them.
It really does seem they intend to close if the PI is denied. Worst case is they would have to divest if they lost the full blown FTC case, but they probably view the risk as miniscule if the FTC can't get an injunction. That probably is a reasonably calculation to be fair, as the FTC needs the courts to enforce anything they decide I think.From what I've read, the PI is a huge part of this process. If the FTC loses they are probably dead in the water, and if the FTC wins they are probably going to be able to block the deal.
So I doubt he's lying, this PI is a huge deal, hence all this testimony.
not even worth reading his threads, he is so uneducated - his opinions don't come with an article or explanations it seems like he just says "I don't get it but looks bad for *blank*"God this guy is such a simpleton. That is like the least important / most obvious thing said ever.
I really really am flabbergasted people still quote this Benji guy lol
The thing is, it's not Deering's simple opinion. In that response Dring is supporting Jim Ryan's opinion that Playstation will be more than fine and that the acquisition will not do any damage to the position of the company. It is a testament to the widespread opinion within SONY regarding MS-ABK.Edited my post. Previously I said none of that was from Ryan, but I missed the part at the top. So yes, that portion is relevant, but not Deering's take on it.
That's a schedule vs technical capability issue. The FTC's angle is retarded.Phil said they acquired ABK because they need their expertise in the mobile division. Now the FTC is showing how this cannot be true since Tencent and other developers are the ones who actually developed games for them.
Have we already decided on who is getting cooked™?
Derek is much better. I don't agree with him always, but he's more professional, and covers way more stuff. Benji seems to tweet the most obvious stuffGod this guy is such a simpleton. That is like the least important / most obvious thing said ever.
I really really am flabbergasted people still quote this Benji guy lol
The thing is, it's not Deering's simple opinion. In that response Dring is supporting Jim Ryan's opinion that Playstation will be more than fine and that the acquisition will not do any damage to the position of the company. It is a testament to the widespread opinion within SONY regarding MS-ABK.
To Tom Warren's credit, his expertise is in robotic vacuum cleaners so you need to cut him some slack.Pundits that fail to use "bombshell" correctly.
I think you're forgetting about the "K". King has expertise in mobile. COD being made by Tencent doesn't really mean anything. Tencent has a proven record translating popular shooters into the mobile format. i.e. PUBG Mobile. Apex Mobile.Phil said they acquired ABK because they need their expertise in the mobile division. Now the FTC is showing how this cannot be true since Tencent and other developers are the ones who actually developed games for them.
We saw a sexual predator in court. Now are you thinking Bobby Kotick or Kevin Spacey first?Not watching today's hearings, any megatons so far ?
Short and to the point. But some intellectually dishonest people are dug in, for the brand™.Deering could disagree with Ryan and it still wouldn't matter. But it needs to be said that this was Ryan's initial opinion on the matter which changed drastically after Phil Spencer sent him an offer pledging COD to PS three years after the end of the current agreement. Jim and Phil eventually reached an impasse.
this is big, microsoft's narrative according to which cod will become available on more than 150 million more players (at least 120) only thanks to the deal has collapsed
this is big, microsoft's narrative according to which cod will become available on more than 150 million more players (at least 120) only thanks to the deal has collapsed
explain the quoteGod this guy is such a simpleton. That is like the least important / most obvious thing said ever.
I really really am flabbergasted people still quote this Benji guy lol