www.guru3d.com
eh, ryzen 3000 series is a big leap over first generation.
You've been saying this and yet we still have no 10nm desktop CPU release date in sight. There was a wccftech rumor that they might come early 2020, but that has been the most recent news on it. It's also not known if whether IceLake will arrive on mainstream or HEDT first. Also, there is still the major issue of clock speeds Intel has to deal with.
semiaccurate.com
ahh... its you again.
What crown you talking about? x game runs on intel at 180fps and on the AMD counterpart at 172fps. Intel pars cost more then the AMD equivalent and you really can justify spending more money just to have a few more frames?
But I can refute you.
You're a bit toxic, ain't you?
Leonidas has an interesting desire to downplay everything AMD does.
It's pretty much the same. Some options are called differently in BIOS, but other then that, no major differences.
Cool, thanks.
Do you have any benchmarks to back this up or are you just pulling these numbers out of your ass? I certainly haven't seen anything from Intel, but then again I'll pay more attention once they actually release a 10nm (or less) CPU.
6 core without hyperthreading already experiences frame stuttering in modern games targeting jaguar 8 core. Now that we have true 8 core consoles coming up with decent performance even 6 core with hyperthreading might experience stuttering.
Your post historic tells otherwise.
If you wish AMD to be better I 100% sure will not be done by downplaying AMD in every news thread. Send them an email, answer #AMD on twitter, facebook, etc... www.amd.com have tools to send feedback, of course, if you really wish what you saying.
Exactly , most 3000 series can’t boost to promised speeds in most cases.
yes but 6 core with HT might not be enough. People are complaining that the 9700k is not enough with 8 threads, 12 threads might not be enough for next gen games which will target far more powerful 16 thread 8 core cpus
They released a fix for that within a week or two after that became news, did you update?
Not unless you buy the AM4 upgrade kit.
You mean a bios update? I see that f50 bios is available for my board. I do have a pre agesa bios.
Oh, I'm well aware. Just pre-emptively advising caution.
3.6 GHz base, 4.4GHz single core short term boost, but your point stands.
Not lifechanging boosts, but yes. Worth a go if/when you have the time.
Right, but this thread is about the Ryzen 4000 series, not the Ryzen 3000 series. The 8700K, which already has hyperthreading enabled, is 7.1% faster than the 3700X at 720p. So if the 4700X is 20% faster, it would be well ahead.
Right, but this thread is about the Ryzen 4000 series, not the Ryzen 3000 series. The 8700K, which already has hyperthreading enabled, is 7.1% faster than the 3700X at 720p. So if the 4700X is 20% faster, it would be well ahead.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X Review
AMD's $330 Ryzen 7 3700X is an 8-core, 16-thread CPU that's clocked high enough to compete with Intel's offerings. Actually, its application performance matches even the more expensive Intel Core i9-9900K. Gaming performance has been increased significantly, too, thanks to the improved...www.techpowerup.com
).
That would be it yes, for more in-depth details might want to check your MoBo manufacturer's website or AMD Forum.
From my intepretation of the article, 20% was suggested as the upper end of the average performance increase we can expect.
! Also, with the new consoles raising the bar yet again and game engines, even Unity, getting more and more use of multi core setups the advantage Ryzen has will flex more and more too.
Any CPU based thread, no matter what forum or site it's on always ends one way.
