• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Scarlett Johansson talks sexism, sidesteps 'Ghost in the Shell' controversy

Status
Not open for further replies.

geestack

Member
yeah, fuck this bullshit. it's amazing how much people love to conveniently whitewash asians out of popular media and culture.
 

see5harp

Member
The is an irony in how Asian American actors have a better chance of building a career if they venture out to make movies in Hong Kong, then when they have a portfolio of starring roles, they might make it back in the US. You can see it in like Daniel Wu, Maggie Q and to an extent Donnie Yen and even Bruce Lee.

That's really the saddest part to me. So many k-pop stars speak perfect English nowadays. This country fucking sucks.
 
I screwed up, I thought it was WB for some reason. However the point still stands for people at Dreamworks who are banking on this.

When has white washing ever worked though? Most recent examples I can think of all bombed. So if the producer is thinking this will help his odds, maybe he's not the best bet. Also this movie will probably bomb as well, and the negative press over the casting isn't helping either.
 
To be fair, Kitsch's best work before John Carter, Friday Night Lights, was pretty great. Who doesn't like Tim Riggins?

Exactly. I liked him in John Carter too but Tim Riggins is one of the tv GOATs. So I also thought he was destined for big things after that show

A shame his career kinda fizzled but hopefully he finds a niche in smaller movies instead of falling off completely

Armie Hammer has been appearing in some cool stuff as of late. He pivoted correctly
 
I'm more interested in the overall quality of the film. Nationality is more secondary to me, but it also important. Personally, I have problem with Johansson's casting, though I can see why some people are upset.

Armie Hammer was an unknown at the time, and he played the title character of Lone Ranger.

As for Depp, at this point I don't think anyone sees him as as bankable outside of a Pirates film.

Then he's not a bankable star these days, then again most aren't thanks to the internet age anyway.
 

Enzom21

Member
Are WoC not victims of sexism and the patriarchy?

ScarJo sidestepping the question was obviously bad, but the idea that combating sexism only benefits white women is ridiculous.

How does this movie help WoC get cast as leads in more films?
If "no Asian actress are bankable" is the reason this role was whitewashed, how is her success with this film going to change that?
Is Johansson going to try get things changed? She most certain ignored the issue and made it about white feminism when asked about it.
 
The is an irony in how Asian American actors have a better chance of building a career if they venture out to make movies in Hong Kong, like Daniel Wu, Maggie Q and to an extent Donnie Yen and even Bruce Lee.

There is a funny interview or an article or something where someone thought Donnie Yen was a big newcomer after Rogue One, despite having a successful acting career in China for years. It's sad that other countries want someone like Jackie Chan in their movies more than America nowadays. Jackie can't do anything anymore yet Robert De Niro can star in another trash movie.
 

Keri

Member
No, her success with this film will continue the belief that only white women are bankable as leads. Her success only helps her and other white women, especially considering she ignored and pushed aside a very real issue to promote white feminism.
Once again, who is tearing her down? You seem to think white women should not be criticized for stepping over WoC for their own success which is not a very feminist thing to do.
If the white women aren't willing to fight for WoC then shit won't change. This is more of the "wait your turn" bullshit. You are more worried about the feelings of white women than you are real issues that affect WoC.

See, this is exactly what I mean. You want her to not make the film at all. So, you're saying that all women should stay down until all women can be elevated to equality, but how likely is that to happen? I mean, honestly? If you believe that racism exists and its real, then you have to understand that a minority women making these first strides is a lot less likely than a white woman. I'm concerned about women's rights and equality in general and you seem to be advocating an "all or nothing" approach, but if that's the approach we take the answer will obviously be "nothing" for everyone. Until society accepts women in these rolls, generally, no one will have any opportunities. And because racism is real and exists, the odds of that first leap being taken by a minority woman are small. I think small steps now are better than waiting for everyone to suddenly be OK with a giant leap, at some undefinable point in the future. Otherwise, we're just telling all women to wait their turn and the wait will be all the longer for all of us.
 
I'm not arguing success, obviously, she's not unknown in the technical sense, but she is unknown in the mainstream film sense as a major actor and the public at large. Tomb Raider is the type of film to make her a box office and bankable star on the worldwide stage that changes her trajectory where people will come to watch a film specifically because she's cast in it.

I really only think that's true if by "mainstream" we're literally only talking about the people who see 1-2 Marvel, Fast and the Furious, or Star Wars blockbuster films in the theater each. Even then, it's likely that they may know her as "that girl from the Bourne movie."

But that's kind of irrelevant to my larger point, which is that when we're trying to identify the systems in place that keep these woc down, it's important to be precise. It's true that Hollywood does occasionally spring for genuine unknowns in major films, but it's more common that they hire someone who is an established and successful name in the industry someone on the level of Alicia Vikander. The problem is that there are very, very few asian-american actresses who even get the opportunities to reach that level. There's literally been one asian actress to win an Oscar, and that was decades ago.

It's a deeper issue then: "Why didn't they cast an asian actress for this role", the problem is that asian actresses are almost entirely shut out of the film industry from the ground floor.
 

see5harp

Member
Exactly. I liked him in John Carter too but Tim Riggins is one of the tv GOATs. So I also thought he was destined for big things after that show

A shame his career kinda fizzled but hopefully he finds a niche in smaller movies instead of falling off completely

Armie Hammer has been appearing in some cool stuff as of late. He pivoted correctly

Taylor fucking sucked in True Detective. Like he was so bad.
 

- J - D -

Member
The "no bankable Asian actor/actress" argument has always been a troubling one or at the very least supports a self-perpetuating mindset. The people who say this never bother to offer ideas or solutions they think would alleviate the issue and feel content to just let things be the way they are.

You can have an Asian lead and still draw in crowds if you also have a support cast of recognizable, bankable faces. Budget an issue? Scarlet is one of the highest paid actors in Hollywood, spread that cash around to your supporting cast instead.

They messed this up years past with non-starter schlocke like Warrior's Way. Asian lead, but that movie had a lame concept and what, Kate Bosworth as the support? Yikes.
 

border

Member
i never seen Ghost in the Shell movie, is it good? it's on my shelf unopened.

My recollection of Ghost in the Shell is that it is somewhat difficult to follow, and almost aggressively ponderous and slow-paced. It's one of those anime "masterworks" where I never understood what all the hype and praise was about.

I'd like to give it a second shot since I haven't seen the movie in like 20 years, but watching it just before the release of the Hollywood version would probably be a bad idea.
 
This movie is what made the series famous (it's good): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_in_the_Shell_(1995_film)

In particular, the opening and ending of the movie are fairly famous (the opening for its visuals, the ending for its discussion of life).

The rest of the series is pretty average at best.

thanks! i kinda wondering why it was so popular, i was into Akira and someone told me back then host in the shell was disappointing so i never got around to watching it. it's strange there's a live action movie of it coming out.

My recollection of Ghost in the Shell is that it is somewhat difficult to follow, and almost aggressively ponderous and slow-paced. It's one of those anime "masterworks" where I never understood what all the hype and praise was about.

I'd like to give it a second shot since I haven't seen the movie in like 20 years, but watching it just before the release of the Hollywood version would probably be a bad idea.

shoot! i literally just replied and saw your post. this is exactly what i heard back in high school.
 

Hari Seldon

Member
If this is where Hollywood is at as to why Asian women and other minorities can't catch a break then it's the problem of the industry as a whole.

Hollywood is pretty shit in general lol. No one but Disney makes any money. Their output is largely garbage. Never in my life have I cared less about Hollywood's output than I do now. Long form TV is where everything is at: quality, money, and public mindshare.
 

kswiston

Member
There is a funny interview or an article or something where someone thought Donnie Yen was a big newcomer after Rogue One, despite having a successful acting career in China for years. It's sad that other countries want someone like Jackie Chan in their movies more than America nowadays. Jackie can't do anything anymore yet Robert De Niro can star in another trash movie.

Jackie Chan is a bad example. He's mainly sticking to Chinese movies because he makes a killing on them. He was third highest paid male actor last year.
 
I really only think that's true if by "mainstream" we're literally only talking about the people who see 1-2 Marvel, Fast and the Furious, or Star Wars blockbuster films in the theater each. Even then, it's likely that they may know her as "that girl from the Bourne movie."

But that's kind of irrelevant to my larger point, which is that when we're trying to identify the systems in place that keep these woc down, it's important to be precise. It's true that Hollywood does occasionally spring for genuine unknowns in major films, but it's more common that they hire someone who is an established and successful name in the industry someone on the level of Alicia Vikander. The problem is that there are very, very few asian-american actresses who even get the opportunities to reach that level. There's literally been one asian actress to win an Oscar, and that was decades ago.

It's a deeper issue then: "Why didn't they cast an asian actress for this role", the problem is that asian actresses are almost entirely shut out of the film industry from the ground floor.

Overall I agree with you, and even agree with with your assesment of Alicia Vikander and her established success in Hollywood, but she is not a mainstream star by any means. You're average Joe Blow who watches movies has never heard of her. It will be Tomb Raider that makes her name to the mainstream.
 
Jackie also did Skiptrace which was a fucking weird ass hodge podge of American and Chinese shit

Like they had a Mongolian gypsy troupe inexplicably break out into Rollin' In The Deep
 

kswiston

Member
Jackie also did Skiptrace which was a fucking weird ass hodge podge of American and Chinese shit

Like they had a Mongolian gypsy troupe inexplicably break out into Rollin' In The Deep

Jackie was estimated to have made $61M last year. Only Dwayne Johnson and Kevin Hart were placed higher. No one needs to cry over his fate vs De Niro's
 

PSqueak

Banned
While i understand the importance of asking her and pressuring her about GITS and white washing, isn't it kinda undermining her impact for the cause of gender equality by going at her with "but white washing!!"?

Because it all feels like a trap, like "Fuck you scarlet, you are part of whitewashing culture, so that means your pro feminism talk is invalid!"
 

Jarmel

Banned
When has white washing ever worked though? Most recent examples I can think of all bombed. So if the producer is thinking this will help his odds, maybe he's not the best bet. Also this movie will probably bomb as well, and the negative press over the casting isn't helping either.
It's not about it being anti-Asian but rather who has a track record. If ScarJo was black and Lucy had still been the slamdunk it was, I imagine she still would have been cast.

People like the producers making this movie are interested primarily in previous results so they can put that on some chart and give a 15 minute Powerpoint presentation to an executive.
 

Cyrano

Member
thanks! i kinda wondering why it was so popular, i was into Akira and someone told me back then host in the shell was disappointing so i never got around to watching it. it's strange there's a live action movie of it coming out.
Yep, it's definitely strange. I wouldn't call the series famous by any stretch of the imagination, particularly in the west. Sci-fi in general doesn't have a good record of successful movies.

If it is famous, it's famous for its filmic qualities, not because of its significance beyond a specific niche in pop culture.
 

Oppo

Member
sorry lightskintwin. i'll take the victory of more female roles as an actual win, even while acknowledging that it is not moving every ball down the field.

this below, is poisonous sarcasm btw, it disrespects the progress made thus far, however meagre you deem it:

lightskintwin said:
Her casting is a win for women of all colors, so pipe down Asian Americans and bask in this progress. Scarlett Johansson is the hero we both deserve and need.
 
So i take it she doesn't perceive the Major has having a racial identity? The question isn't very specific and the answer doesn't clarify.
 

Enzom21

Member
See, this is exactly what I mean. You want her to not make the film at all. So, you're saying that all women should stay down until all women can be elevated to equality, but how likely is that to happen? I mean, honestly? If you believe that racism exists and its real, then you have to understand that a minority women making these first strides is a lot less likely than a white woman. I'm concerned about women's rights and equality in general and you seem to be advocating an "all or nothing" approach, but if that's the approach we take the answer will obviously be "nothing" for everyone. Until society accepts women in these rolls, generally, no one will have any opportunities. And because racism is real and exists, the odds of that first leap being taken by a minority woman are small. I think small steps now are better than waiting for everyone to suddenly be OK with a giant leap, at some undefinable point in the future. Otherwise, we're just telling all women to wait their turn and the wait will be all the longer for all of us.

How will the whitewashing of this role help WoC?
Johansson ignored the questions, so she clearly doesn't care and even WoC have the same opportunities as her, that's one less role for her.
How will society "accept" WoC when they are not even given a chance? How many roles should be whitewashed so society will accept WoC?
Despite what you think, white women aren't the default and them changing things in Hollywood doesn't automatically help WoC.
 
While i understand the importance of asking her and pressuring her about GITS and white washing, isn't it kinda undermining her impact for the cause of gender equality by going at her with "but white washing!!"?

Because it all feels like a trap, like "Fuck you scarlet, you are part of whitewashing culture, so that means your pro feminism talk is invalid!"

SMH. It was her answer that decided whitewashing was unimportant to her impact on gender equality for this role that people have an issue with.

sorry lightskintwin. i'll take the victory of more female roles as an actual win, even while acknowledging that it is not moving every ball down the field.

this below, is poisonous sarcasm btw, it disrespects the progress made thus far, however meagre you deem it:

That's fine, but I'll continue to take issue with her lack of acknowledgment of the issue when directly asked about it.
 
How does this movie help WoC get cast as leads in more films?
If "no Asian actress are bankable" is the reason this role was whitewashed, how is her success with this film going to change that?
Is Johansson going to try get things changed? She most certain ignored the issue and made it about white feminism when asked about it.

Women of color in the industry face two hurdles, as the label suggests: their sex and their skin color. By saying that fighting sexism doesn't benefit WoC, you are diminishing that part of their struggle.
 
There is a funny interview or an article or something where someone thought Donnie Yen was a big newcomer after Rogue One, despite having a successful acting career in China for years. It's sad that other countries want someone like Jackie Chan in their movies more than America nowadays. Jackie can't do anything anymore yet Robert De Niro can star in another trash movie.

Eh, it's not like European countries and the likes are rolling over large amounts of cash to get Jackie cast in one of their films. He largely works in Asian related countries these days, for obvious reasons.
 
So i take it she doesn't perceive the Major has having a racial identity? The question isn't very specific and the answer doesn't clarify.

Considering the character, in this film, is just "The Major" and not "Mokoto" she is correct in that statement. It's not that she's playing a Japanese woman, but that this take on the character is no longer Japanese.

That's not to say this isn't an example of "whitewashing," just that she's ultimately correct in her statement on a technical level.
 
I suspect that so few people are going to see this film that it's not even going to be an issue worth discussing.

I hope you're wrong regardless of the movie's quality because I want cyberpunk to take off. The potential box office one-two punch of Ghost in the Shell and Blade Runner: Do Androids Dream of Electric Boogaloo could usher in a new wave of big-budget cyberpunk productions.
 

Fuchsdh

Member
The "no bankable Asian actor/actress" argument has always been a troubling one or at the very least supports a self-perpetuating mindset. The people who say this never bother to offer ideas or solutions they think would alleviate the issue and feel content to just let things be the way they are.

You can have an Asian lead and still draw in crowds if you also have a support cast of recognizable, bankable faces. Budget an issue? Scarlet is one of the highest paid actors in Hollywood, spread that cash around to your supporting cast instead.

They messed this up years past with non-starter schlocke like Warrior's Way. Asian lead, but that movie had a lame concept and what, Kate Bosworth as the support? Yikes.

The way forward is pretty obvious; either enough people support Asian stars lower on the rungs so they get a shot to headline something, rolling stone and all that, or some studio guy/gal takes a chance on casting on a film that's a success and it slowly breaks down the barriers that way.

I don't disagree it's self-perpetuating, because with these sorts of issues it's very much a chicken-or-egg situation. You can't make a big film without bankable leads, can't generate those bankable leads unless they're given roles, but they aren't given roles because they're yet not bankable leads. This isn't even a racial issue—as anyone who has had to apply to entry-level jobs demanding years of experience, it's bullshit that occurs in every industry, and those who are disadvantaged are going to bear the brunt of it.

The problem is that while the solution is obvious, the mechanics of effecting that change aren't. Are people going to see Hidden Figures because it's about women? Because it's about colored women? Or that it's a good movie, or that it's a good movie that features people of color? More to the point, if Hidden Figures was trash, is it someone's responsibility to support crappy entertainment in the hope it somehow translates to more opportunities for minorities or women? Is that something that is enough of a concern to enough people that it can be a large enough economic force to push the studios to consider? And then with these blockbusters it becomes an even bigger issue because now American sensibilities and concerns are increasingly marginalized for a global audience.
 

Timbuktu

Member
Jackie Chan is a bad example. He's mainly sticking to Chinese movies because he makes a killing on them. He was third highest paid male actor last year.

It is true that countries in Asia like Korea, Hong Kong and increasingly China all have their own film industries that means actors don't have to look to Hollywood for 'success'. Just because their ancestral homes offer opportunities, that doesn't mean Asian Americans shouldn't have a place in the country they call home. For guys like Daniel Wu, the US was their home and some even had to learn Cantonese to thrive in HK like he did.
 
How will the whitewashing of this role help WoC?
Johansson ignored the questions, so she clearly doesn't care and even WoC have the same opportunities as her, that's one less role for her.
How will society "accept" WoC when they are not even given a chance? How many roles should be whitewashed so society will accept WoC?
Despite what you think, white women aren't the default and them changing things in Hollywood doesn't automatically help WoC.

The only thing we have is:

On the controversy surrounding her casting as the lead in Ghost in a Shell: "I certainly would never presume to play another race of a person. Diversity is important in Hollywood, and I would never want to feel like I was playing a character that was offensive. Also, having a franchise with a female protagonist driving it is such a rare opportunity. Certainly, I feel the enormous pressure of that—the weight of such a big property on my shoulders."

And that's apparently just an edited excerpt. Without reading the issue itself, which is not out until a week from today, there's nothing that can be said as to whether she avoided the question or not, because we don't know what the question actually was. By the looks of her answer, the question might have been very general as well.

Considering the character, in this film, is just "The Major" and not "Mokoto" she is correct in that statement. It's not that she's playing a Japanese woman, but that this take on the character is no longer Japanese.

That's not to say this isn't an example of "whitewashing," just that she's ultimately correct in her statement on a technical level.

There are other concerns pertaining to the exclusion of its japanese origins, mostly concerning the political statements it makes and the themes it explores. Ghost in The Shell, today, is invariably anachronistic, though it might not look it what with the robots and all.
 

PSqueak

Banned
SMH. It was her answer that decided whitewashing was unimportant to her impact on gender equality for this role that people have an issue with.

But that's the thing, there was no real way to answer that wouldn't make her come off as either a bitch (what she answered) or hypocrite (trash talking the people who gave her the role of a japanese character that she took) and ultimately her credibility was hurt.

And while both topics are important, it's a shitty thing to use Diversity to hurt her valid points about Gender equality.
 
iyVSavR.jpg


She is great casting for the Major.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom