Danjin44
The nicest person on this forum
FFXIII-2what game is that?
FFXIII-2what game is that?
Yes, that screenshot represents the pinnacle of PS3 graphics.You guys have very shitty memory of what PS3 games used to look like.
Looks impressive for a 2013 game, but I wouldn't doubt it if these cherry picked images came from the PC version under the best possible circumstances.
This was taken on PC yes, I took these screenshots.This actual PS3 version looks like
Hey, HD towns are HARD!Yes, that screenshot represents the pinnacle of PS3 graphics.
it's a matter of style (& personal preference, of course). i really enjoyed the style of the environments in final fantasy xiv. they were more fanciful, & less 'realistic'. what i've seen of final fantasy xvi so far is much more 'western fantasy rpg' bog standard...Ok so is this the bar for you? As in anything less is generic? I kinda wished you provided an example that's within the same type of setting as FFXVI.
They going for more darker fantasy, its like calling Berserk western comic because it has darker tone.it's a matter of style (& personal preference, of course). i really enjoyed the style of the environments in final fantasy xiv. they were more fanciful, & less 'realistic'. what i've seen of final fantasy xvi so far is much more 'western fantasy rpg' bog standard...
& i think that you're welcome to your opinion, as am i...They going for more darker fantasy, its like calling Berserk western comic because it has darker tone.
Have you not played games like Drakengard? Also very dark medieval fantasy, it doesnt make it WRPG.
I think most of you just like throw "generic" at thing you dont like without actually knowing the meaning.
But you are not even providing any proper argument why its "generic"? Because it less colourful? We have more JRPGs with colourful aesthetics than JRPG with darker tone.& i think that you're welcome to your opinion, as am i...
see my edit above. 'nothing distinctive or unique about it'. that's exactly how ffxvi has looked to me from everything i've seen...But you are not even providing any proper argument why its "generic"? Because it less colourful? We have more JRPGs with colourful aesthetics than JRPG with darker tone.
You dont like the aesthetics they going for that fine, but just calling things you dont like "generic" doesn't mean anything.
If that’s your logic then 99% of games are generic because other place already done it. You showed Bloodborne as example of not being “generic” but lot of games, movies comics and anime done H.P lovecraft gothic aesthetics.see my edit above. 'nothing distinctive or unique about it'. that's exactly how ffxvi has looked to me from everything i've seen...
what? like, design-wise, that couldn't be the cover of a fifties sci-fi paperback? because that was exactly what i thought of the first time i saw it...
so, yeah - generic...
dude, it's not my logic. it's the definition of the word 'generic'. look: i personally, see nothing 'distinctive and unique' about ffxvi, & therefore i described it as 'generic'. if you, on the other hand, can see something 'distinctive & unique' about ffxvi, well, i'm happy for you...If that’s your logic then 99% of games are generic because other place already done it. You showed Bloodborne as example of not being “generic” but lot of games, movies comics and anime done H.P lovecraft gothic aesthetics.
You have to buy $200 in NFT's to unlock those visuals I kid...Looks too good. Still waiting for the catch...
You're so boring and predictable lol.
Yes, they have this very nice soft shadowing system in the forest scenes but it doesn't seem to be used anywhere else for some reason.I just watched it, looks good but something seemed off with the lighting. The characters don't look seated in the environments in a lot of scenes. It's like they are superimposed over a photo. Maybe it was the Youtube stream i dunno but something looks off.
This already happened with FFXIII. It used PS2-era techniques for its rendering (at a much higher quality level of course) so it looked dated at release compared to games that used a more advanced rendering paradigm.I guess I can see the problem with graphics reception for this generation: it is hard to create stylized and "next gen" looking graphics at the same time. So almost everything finish as medieval render from house designing software. Forspoken was alpha, Hogwarts was beta, FFXVI may be a "full release without day one patch", but is still not fully cracked on how to do it well 100%.
it's a matter of style (& personal preference, of course). i really enjoyed the style of the environments in final fantasy xiv. they were more fanciful, & less 'realistic'. what i've seen of final fantasy xvi so far is much more 'western fantasy rpg' bog standard...
I remember when people trolled forspoken for having auto-evade in the accessibility options and i love how people keep the same energy here...Combat is looking responsive, maybe fun. Even if it's not RPG style.
One question, how different abilities differ from each other outside dazzling graphical effects? Particle effects are definitely distracting, in what's supposed to be twitch reaction based rpg.
Also too much focus on helping unskilled players. Always a warning sign.
I remember when people trolled forspoken for having auto-evade in the accessibility options and i love how people keep the same energy here...
Good times.
No...they are not?!Both are same to me.
Sister projects, made by same developers, with similar budget, sensibilities and overall quality.
They have different team, director, engine, writers etc.
You have a point.All of those things are created by humans so they are the exact same.
You have shit taste in combat, period.People saying the combat looks boring just downright have shit taste in gaming period.
They said it would be Devil May Cry + Final Fantasy and it looks just like that, seamless non-stop combos with a rating system to value the player's creativity in combat mixed with RPG elements like party members, elemental weaknesses and skill trees, it looks fun.
The last Square game I played probably was Secret of Evermore, so no proper knowledge about FF, but if someone told me this is DMC with some complicating stuff added I'd believe it. But games are like cars, becoming more and more similar to one another.It looks more like Devil May Cry. I don't see much Final Fantasy there.
You must have been Drunk on Donkey PissGraphics are incredible, world looks great to explore, but the combat looks really boring.
Clearly you've been high on baby powder since yesterdayThis looks meh.
Way over-hyped!
Thank goodness your opinion don't countI'm torn on this.
Think ffvii remake part 2 is for me this year. Strange it can look great but a lot ofnthe time it looks really flatly lit and the combat looks ...I dunno.
Hopefully it's great but this looks much worse than hogwarts legacy to me, it looks kinda bland?
Can't put my finger on it.
Is it unreal engine 4?